The greatest threat faced by wild animals often comes from the destruction of their habitats by humans. Traditional environmental-conservation paradigms often fail to prevent this destruction. This paper claims that, where access to habitat is a necessary condition of their continued existence or wellbeing, wild animals have sufficiently strong interests in their habitat to generate rights to it. The paper argues that these rights should be instantiated in the form of collective usufructuary property rights, and, in cases of serious and systematic violation of these rights, wild animals gain a remedial right of secession for their habitat.
BarryB.1997. ‘Sustainability and intergenerational justice’. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory89: 43–64. Crossref.
2.
BirkettL. and McGrewW.. 2013. “‘Unnatural behavior”: Obstacle or insight at the species interface?’ In CorbeyR. and LanjouwA. (eds), The Politics of Species: Reshaping Our Relationships with Other Animals, pp. 141–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
3.
BuchananA.2003. ‘The making and unmaking of boundaries: What liberalism has to say’. In BuchananA. and MooreM. (eds), States, Nations and Borders, pp. 231–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
4.
Commission on Global Governance [CGG].1995. Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora [CITES]. 1973. 993 UNTS 243. Report of 3 March. Washington, DC: CITES.
6.
CochraneA.2009. ‘Do animals have an interest in liberty?’ Political Studies57(3): 660–679. Crossref.
7.
CochraneA.2010. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref.
8.
CochraneA.2012. Animal Rights Without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
9.
DeGraziaD.2002. Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
10.
DonaldsonS. and KymlickaW.. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
FeinbergJ.2012. ‘The rights of animals and unborn generations’. In Shafer-LandauR., (ed.) Ethical Theory: An Anthology, pp. 372–380. Second edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
Fernández-ArmestoF.2005. So You Think You're Human?: A Brief History of Humankind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FrancioneG.L. and GarnerR.. 2010. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
GarnerR.2013. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
15.
GoodinR.E., PatemanC. and PatemanR.. 1997. ‘Simian sovereignty’. Political Theory25(6): 821–849. Crossref.
16.
HadleyJ.2005. ‘Nonhuman animal property: Reconciling environmentalism and animal rights’. Journal of Social Philosophy36(3): 305–315. Crossref.
17.
HadleyJ.2006. ‘The duty to aid nonhuman animals in dire need’. Journal of Applied Philosophy23(4): 445–451. Crossref.
18.
HaywardT.2004. Constitutional Environmental Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
19.
HohfeldW.N.1917. ‘Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning’. The Yale Law Journal26(8): 710–770. Crossref.
20.
KorsgaardC.2004. ‘Fellow creatures: Kantian ethics and our duties to animals’. Tanner Lectures on Human Values24: 77–110.
21.
MeernikJ.2004. ‘Reaching inside the state: International law and superior liability’. International Studies Perspectives5(4): 356–377. Crossref.
22.
MillerD.1999. ‘Social justice and environmental goods’. In DobsonA., (ed.) Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, pp. 151–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
Morrogh-BernardH.C.2008. ‘Fur-rubbing as a form of self-medication in Pongo Pygmaeus’. International Journal of Primatology29(4): 1059–1064. Crossref.
25.
NineC.2008. ‘Territory is not derived from property: A response to Steiner’. Political Studies56(4): 957–963. Crossref.
26.
NortonB.G.1994. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
NussbaumM.2006. Frontiers of Justice. London: Belknap Press.
28.
PassmoreJ.1974. ‘Attitudes to nature’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements8: 251–264. Crossref.
29.
RachelsJ.1976. ‘Do animals have a right to liberty?’ In ReganT. and SingerP. (eds), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, pp. 205–223. London: Prentice-Hall.
30.
RawlsJ.1999. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
31.
RazJ.1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
32.
ReganT.2001. Defending Animal Rights. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
33.
ReganT.2004. The Case for Animal Rights. Second edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
ReganT. and CohenC. (eds). 2001. The Animal Rights Debate. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
RiddellR.2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
SheltonD.1991. ‘Human rights, environmental rights, and the right to environment’. Stanford Journal of International Law28: 103.
37.
ShueH.1996. Basic Rights. Second edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
ShumakerR.W.2007. Orangutans. St. Paul, MN: Voyageur Press.
39.
SingletonI., WichS.A., NowakM. and UsherG.. 2016. ‘Pongo Abelii (Sumatran Orangutan)’. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Online at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/39780/0 (accessed 7 October 2016).
40.
StilzA.2009. ‘Why do states have territorial rights?’ International Theory1(2): 185–213. Crossref.
van SchaikC.P., AncrenazM., BorgenG., GaldikasB., KnottC.D., SingletonI., SuzukiA., UtamiS.S. and MerrillM.. 2003. ‘Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture’. Science299(5603): 102–105. Crossref.
45.
WaldronJ.1993. ‘A right-based critique of constitutional rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies13(1): 18–51. Crossref.