Framing a ‘Climate Change Frontier’: International News Media Coverage Surrounding Natural Resource Development in Greenland

Abstract

News media helps shape the discourse around natural resource issues, especially rapidly emerging developments such as those taking place in the Arctic. Whilst the relationship between media and audience is complex, news media contributes towards setting the tone and expectations for the burgeoning number of stakeholders engaging with the Arctic, especially in the case of Greenland. This study undertakes a thematic analysis of English-language news media coverage surrounding natural resource development in Greenland to explore how the issue is framed. Five media frames are identified: an emerging resource frontier; the warming Arctic; high-risk activity; geopolitical Greenland; and vulnerable traditional societies. An overarching frame is present within the coverage, one which depicts Greenland as ‘a climate change frontier’, facing ‘uncertainties in the face of rapid change’. Media portrayals of a close-knit relationship between a warming climate and a rush for natural resources in Greenland could be problematic for several reasons, namely the disparity between actual resource development taking place and an overemphasis on increased economic development following increased warming.

Keywords

Natural resource development Greenland climate change resource frontier Arctic media frames

References

AMAP (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme). 2010. ‘Assessment 2007: Oil and gas activities in the Arctic – Effects and potential effects, Vol. 2’. Available at: http://www.amap.no/documents/doc/assessment-2007-oil-and-gas-activities-in-the-arctic-effects-and-potential-effects.-volume-2/100 (accessed 28 March 2017).

APM (Alaska Public Media). 2015. ‘Plunging oil prices cast doubt on Arctic drilling’. Alaska Energy Forum, 15 January. Available at: http://www.alaskaenergyforum.com/article/plunging-oil-prices-cast-doubt-on-arctic-drilling (accessed 28 March 2017).

Avango

, Nilsson

A.E.

and Roberts

. 2013. ‘Assessing Arctic futures: Voices, resources and governance’. Polar Journal 3(2): 431–446. Crossref.

Barua

2010. ‘Whose issue? Representations of human–elephant conflict in Indian and international media’. Science Communication 32: 55–75. Crossref.

Bjørst

L.R.

2012. ‘Politiske positioner og skift i den grønlandske klimadebat fra 2001 til 2011’. Tidsskriftet Grønland 60(1): 2–19.

Braun

, and Clarke

. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. Crossref.

Buhr

, and Hansson

. 2011. ‘Capturing the stories of corporations: A comparison of media debates on carbon capture and storage in Norway and Sweden’. Global Environmental Change 21: 336–345. Crossref.

Butcher

H.K.

, Holkup

P.A.

, Park

and Maasz

. 2001. ‘Thematic analysis of the experience of making a decision to place a family member with Alzheimer's disease in a Special Care Unit’. Research in Nursing and Health 24: 470–480. Crossref.

Carvalho

2000. ‘Discourse analysis and media texts: A critical reading of analytical tools’. Paper presented at the International Conference on Logic and Methodology, RC 33 meeting, International Sociology Association, Cologne, 3–6 October.

10.

Christensen

2013. ‘Arctic climate change and the media: The news story that was’. In Christensen

, Nilsson

A.E.

and Wormbs

(eds), Media and the Politics of Arctic Climate Change: When the Ice Breaks, pp. 26–51. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

11.

Couldry

2005. ‘Transvaluing media studies’. In Curran

and Morley

(eds), Media and Cultural Theory, pp. 177–194. Abingdon: Routledge.

12.

Crone

T.J.

, and Tolstoy

. 2010. ‘Magnitude of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil leak’. Science 330: 634. Crossref.

13.

Doel

R.E.

, Wråkberg

and Zeller

. 2014. ‘Science, environment, and the new Arctic’. Journal of Historical Geography 44: 2–14. Crossref.

14.

Doulton

, and Brown

. 2009. ‘Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press’. Global Environment Change 19: 191–202. Crossref.

15.

Doyle

2011. ‘Acclimatizing nuclear? Climate change, nuclear power and the re-framing of risk in the UK news media’. International Communication Gazette 73: 107–125. Crossref.

16.

Entman

R.M.

1993. ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’. Journal of Communications 43: 51–58. Crossref.

17.

Entman

R.M.

2007. ‘Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power’. Journal of Communications 57: 163–173. Crossref.

18.

Gamson

W.A.

, Croteau

, Hoynes

and Sasson

. 1992. ‘Media images and the social construction of reality’. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 373–393. Crossref.

19.

Gandiwa

, Sprangers

, van Bommel

, Heitkönig

, Leeuwis

and Prins

H.H.

. 2014. ‘Spill-over effect in media framing: Representations of wildlife conservation in Zimbabwean and international media’. Journal for Natural Conservation 5: 413–423. Crossref.

20.

Gitlin

1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

GME (Greenland Minerals and Energy). 2011. ‘Greenland government introduces uranium licensing framework for the Kvanefjeld multi-element project’, 5 December. Available at: http://www.ggg.gl/investor-information/asx-announcements/green-land-government-introduces-uranium-licensing-framework-for-the-kvanefjeld-multi-element-project/ (accessed 28 March 2017).

22.

Gregersen

n.d. ‘A summary of the oil and gas exploration history of Greenland’, Greenland Oil Industry Association. Available at: http://www.goia.gl/OilGasinGreenland/History.aspx (accessed 18 March 2015).

23.

Hansen

2010. Environment, Media and Communication. New York: Routledge.

24.

Hansen

2011. ‘Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication’. International Communication Gazette 73: 7–25. Crossref.

25.

Happer

, and Philo

. 2013. ‘The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change’. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 1: 321–336. Crossref.

26.

Harsem

Ø.

, Eide

and Heen

. 2011. ‘Factors influencing future oil and gas prospects in the Arctic’. Energy Policy 39: 8037–8045. Crossref.

27.

Hassol

S.J.

2004. Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Overview Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.amap.no/documents/doc/impacts-of-a-warming-arctic-2004/786 (accessed 28 March 2017).

28.

Howard

2009. The Arctic Gold Rush: The New Race for Tomorrow's Natural Resources. London: Continuum.

29.

Jaspal

, and Nerlich

. 2013. ‘Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate’. Public Understanding of Science 23(3): 348–363. Crossref.

30.

Jensen

L.C.

2007. ‘Petroleum discourse in the European Arctic: The Norwegian case’. Polar Record 43: 247–254. Crossref.

31.

Joffe

2011. ‘Thematic analysis’. In Harper

and Thompson

A.R.

(eds), Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, pp. 209–223. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

32.

Keil

2014. ‘The Arctic: A new region of conflict? The case of oil and gas’. Cooperation and Conflict 49: 162–190. Crossref.

33.

Keskitalo

E.C.H.

2004. Negotiating the Arctic: The Construction of an International Region. New York: Routledge.

34.

Knecht

, and Keil

. 2013. ‘Arctic geopolitics revisited: Spatialising governance in the circumpolar North’. Polar Journal 3(1): 178–203. Crossref.

35.

Koivurova

2010. ‘Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance’. Polar Record 46: 146–156. Crossref.

36.

Koivurova

2013. ‘The dialectic of understanding progress in Arctic governance’. Michigan State International Law Review 22(1): 1–21.

37.

Krefting

1991. ‘Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness’. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45: 214–222. Crossref.

38.

Lakoff

2010. ‘Why it matters how we frame the environment’. Environmental Communication 4: 70–81. Crossref.

39.

Lindholt

2006. ‘Arctic natural resources in a global perspective’. In Glomsrød

and Aslaksen

(eds), The Economy of the North, pp. 27–39. Oslo: Statistics Norway.

40.

Lindholt

, and Glomsrød

. 2012. ‘The Arctic: No big bonanza for the global petroleum industry’. Energy Economics 34: 1465–1474. Crossref.

41.

Long

, van Gosen

, Foley

and Cordier

. 2012. ‘The principal rare earth elements deposits of the United States: A summary of the domestic deposits and a global perspective’, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5220. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5220/ (accessed 28 March 2017).

42.

Macdonald

2003. Exploring Media Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

43.

McDowell

, and Ford

J.D.

. 2014. ‘The socio-ecological dimensions of hydrocarbon development in the Disko Bay region of Greenland: Opportunities, risks, and tradeoffs’. Applied Geography 46: 98–110. Crossref.

44.

Mikkelsen

, and Langhelle

. 2008. Arctic Oil and Gas: Sustainability at Risk? London: Routledge.

45.

Miles

, and Wright

N.J.R.

. 1978. ‘An outline of mineral extraction in the Arctic’. Polar Record 19: 11–38. Crossref.

46.

Nakicenovic

, and Swart

. 2000. Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

47.

Nerlich

2010. “‘Climategate”: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis’. Environmental Values 19(4): 419–442. Crossref.

48.

Nuttall

2008. ‘Self-rule in Greenland: Towards the world's first independent Inuit state’. Indigenous Affairs 8: 64–70.

49.

Nuttall

2012. ‘Imagining and governing the Greenlandic resource frontier’. Polar Journal 2(1): 113–124. Crossref.

50.

Nyman

2012. ‘Understanding the Arctic: Three popular media views on the North’. Political Geography 31: 399–401. Crossref.

51.

Olausson

2011. “‘We're the ones to blame”: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media’. Environmental Communication 5: 281–299. Crossref.

52.

Reese

S.D.

2007. ‘The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited’. Journal of Communication 57: 148–154. Crossref.

53.

Ren

2016. ‘Cool or hot Greenland? Exhibiting and enacting sustainable Arctic futures’. Journal of Cleaner Production 111(B): 442–450.

54.

Sadath

, Kleinschmit

and Giessen

. 2013. ‘Framing the tiger: A biodiversity concern in national and international media reporting’. Forest Policy and Economics 36: 37–41. Crossref.

55.

Schön

D.A.

, and Rein

. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.

56.

Soroka

, Farnsworth

, Lawlor

and Young

. 2013. ‘Mass media and policy-making’. In Araral

, Fritzen

, Howlettt

, Ramesh

and Wu

(eds), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 204–214. New York: Routledge.

57.

Stamm

K.R.

, Clark

and Eblacas

P.R.

. 2000. ‘Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming’. Public Understanding of Science 9: 219–237. Crossref.

58.

Steinberg

, Brunn

J.M.

and Ingrid

A.M.

. 2014. ‘Covering Kiruna, a natural experiment in Arctic awareness’. Polar Geography 37(4): 273–297. Crossref.

59.

Stuhl

2013. ‘The politics of the “New North”: Putting history and geography at stake in Arctic futures’. Polar Journal 3(1): 94–119. Crossref.

60.

Tierney

, Bevc

and Kuligowski

. 2006. ‘Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 604: 57–81. Crossref.

61.

Tyrrell

, and Clark

D.A.

. 2014. ‘What happened to climate change? CITES and the reconfiguration of polar bear conservation discourse’. Global Environmental Change 24: 363–372. Crossref.

62.

USGS (US Geological Survey). 2008. ‘90 billion barrels of oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas assessed in the Arctic’. Available at: http://www.usgs.gov/news-room/article.asp?ID=1980 (accessed 27 November 2013).

63.

Wilson Rowe

2013. ‘A dangerous space? Unpacking state and media discourses on the Arctic’. Polar Geography 36(3): 232–244. Crossref.

64.

Young

O.R.

2011. ‘The future of the Arctic: Cauldron of conflict or zone of peace?’ International Affairs 87(1): 185–193. Crossref.

65.

Young

O.R.

2012. ‘Building an international regime complex for the Arctic: Current status and next steps’. Polar Journal 2(2): 391–407. Crossref.