Acosta GarcíaN., FarrellK.N., HeikkinenH.I. and SarkkiS.. 2017. ‘A teleological approach to the wicked problem of managing Utría National Park’. Environmental Values26 (5): 583–605.
2.
BachT.M. and LarsonB.M.H.. 2017. ‘Speaking about weeds: Indigenous elders' metaphors for invasive species and their management’. Environmental Values26 (5): 561–581.
3.
ConstantN.L. and BellS.. 2017. ‘Governance, participation and local perceptions of protected areas: Unwinding traumatic nature in the Blouberg mountain range’. Environmental Values26 (5): 539–559.
4.
CookeS.2017. ‘Animal kingdoms: On habitat rights for nonhuman animals’. Environmental Values26 (1): 53–72.
DrenthenM.2017. ‘Environmental Hermeneutics’. In GardinerS. M. and ThompsonA., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, pp. 162–173. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
FaberM., ManstettenR. and ProopsJ.L.R.. 1995. ‘On the conceptual foundations of ecological economics: A teleological approach’. Ecological Economics12: 41–54.
8.
HadleyJ.2015. Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Animals. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
9.
MilburnJ.2017. ‘Nonhuman animals as property holders: An exploration of the Lockean labour-mixing account’. Environmental Values26 (5): 629–648.
SterbaJ.2005. ‘Global justice for all humans or for all living beings and what difference it makes’. The Journal of Ethics9: 283–300.
12.
TrainorS.F.2006. ‘Realms of value: Conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability’. Environmental Values15 (1): 3–29.
13.
Van AsscheK., BellS. and TeampauP.. 2012. ‘Traumatic natures of the swamp: Concepts of nature in the Romanian Danube delta’. Environmental Values21 (2): 163–183.