Green Faith? The Role of Faith-Based Actors in Global Sustainable Development Discourse

Abstract

Ethical questions concerning global sustainability governance have been widely discussed with respect to the role of civil society in general. Interestingly, faith-based actors (FBAs) have so far attracted scant attention in this context. Yet FBAs actively participate in international political negotiations and public debates on sustainable development. Secularisation theory differentiates between religious and secular actors. To date, however, it remains unclear whether FBAs contribute a distinct faith-based perspective to global sustainable development discourse and, if so, what this perspective is. The present article aims to identify the relevant norms and ideas in FBAs’ communications and to contrast them with other existing ideas on sustainable development. On the basis of a content analysis of the submissions by FBAs and non-faith based civil society groups in the context of the UN Rio+20 summit, the article first investigates what visions are contained in current articulations of FBAs with respect to sustainable development. Secondly, it explores in what way FBAs’ ideas about sustainable development differ from those of secular civil society. Our analysis establishes a basis for further inquiries into the role of FBAs in global sustainable development discourse.

Keywords

Sustainable development religion environment discourse post-secularism

References

Anshelm

, and Hansson

. 2011. ‘Climate change and the convergence between ENGOs and business: On the loss of utopian energies’. Environmental Values 20(1): 75–94. Crossref.

Appleby

2000. The Ambivalence of the Sacred. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Audi

, and Wolterstorff

. 1997. Religion in the Public Square. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Ki-Moon

Ban

. 2009. ‘Many heavens, one earth: Faith commitment for a living planet’. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2009/sgsm12585.doc.htm (accessed 4 June 2017).

Barbato

, and Kratochwil

. 2009. ‘Towards a post-secular political order?’ European Political Science Review 1(3): 317–340. Crossref.

Baumgart-Ochse

2010. ‘Religiöse Akteure und die Opportunitätsstruktur der Internationalen Beziehung’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17(1): 101–117. Crossref.

Berger

2003. ‘Religious nongovernmental organizations’. Voluntas 14(1): 15–39. Crossref.

Berger

1969. The Sacred Canopy. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

Berger

1999. The Desecularization of the World. Washington: Eerdmans Publishing.

10.

Bernstein

, and Cashore

2007. ‘Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework’. Regulation and Governance 1(4): 347–371. Crossref.

11.

Berry

2014. ‘Religion and sustainability in global civil society: Some basic find-ings from Rio+20’. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture and Ecology 18(3): 269–288. Crossref.

12.

Biermann

, and Gupta

. 2011. ‘Accountability and legitimacy in Earth System Governance’. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1856–1864. Crossref.

13.

Bush

2007. ‘Measuring religion in global civil society’. Social Forces 85(4): 1645–1665. Crossref.

14.

Carr

, Patterson

, Yung

and Spencer

. 2012. ‘The faithful skeptics’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 6(3): 276–299. Crossref.

15.

Cashore

2002. ‘Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority’. Governance 15(4): 503–529. Crossref.

16.

Corell

and Betsill

. 2001. ‘A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: Desertification and climate change’. Global Environmental Politics 1(4): 86–107. Crossref.

17.

Di Giulio

, Defila

and Kaufmann-Hayoz

. 2010. ‘Gutes Leben, Bedürfnisse und nachhaltiger Konsum’. Umweltpsychologie 14(2): 10–29.

18.

DPI (Democratic Progress Institute). 2012. ‘Civil society mediation in conflict resolution’. Working paper. Available at: http://www.democraticprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Civil-Society-Mediation-in-Conflict-Resolution.pdf (accessed 17 January 2018).

19.

Dryzek

2005. The Politics of the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Dryzek

, and Stevenson

. 2011. ‘Global democracy and Earth System Governance’. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1865–1874. Crossref.

21.

Dunlap

2006. ‘Environmentalism, a secular faith’. Environmental Values 15(3): 321–330. Crossref.

22.

Epstein

2005. ‘Knowledge and power in global environmental activism’. International Journal of Peace Studies 10(1): 47–67.

23.

Falk

2002. ‘Religion and global governance’. International Journal on World Peace 19(1): 3–37.

24.

Florini

(ed.). 2000. The Third Force. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

25.

Francis . 2015. ‘Encyclical letter “Laudato Si” of the Holy Father Francis on the care for our common home’. Available at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (accessed 12 June 2017).

26.

Fuchs

2007. Business Power in Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

27.

Glaab

2017. ‘A climate for justice? Faith-based advocacy on climate change at the United Nations’. Globalizations 14(7): 1110–1124. Crossref.

28.

Glaab

2018. ‘Faithful translation? Shifting the boundaries of the religious and the secular in the global climate change debate’. In Berger

and Esguerra

(eds), World Politics in Translation: Power, Relationality, and Difference in Global Cooperation, pp. 175–190. London: Routledge.

29.

Gore

2006. An Inconvenient Truth. New York: Rodale Press.

30.

Gottlieb

2006. A Greener Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Grim

2013. ‘The roles of religions in activating an ecological consciousness’. International Social Science Journal 205/206: 255–269.

32.

Habermas

2001. Glauben und Wissen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

33.

Hajer

1993. ‘Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain’. In Fischer

and Forester

(eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, pp. 43–67. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

34.

Hajer

1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

35.

Holzscheiter

2005. ‘Discourse as capability’. Millennium 33(3): 723–746. Crossref.

36.

Kalland

2005. ‘The religious environmentalist paradigm’. In Taylor

, (ed.) Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature, pp. 1367–1371. London: Continuum.

37.

Kerber

2014. ‘International advocacy for climate justice’. In Veldman

, Szasz

and Haluza-DeLay

(eds), How the World's Religions are Responding to Climate Change, pp. 278–293. Milton Park: Routledge.

38.

Kratochwil

2005. ‘Religion and (inter-)national politics’. Alternatives 30(2): 113–140. Crossref.

39.

Kubálková

2000. ‘Towards an international political theology’. Millennium 29(3): 675–704. Crossref.

40.

Levy

, and Newell

(eds). 2005. The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

41.

Litfin

1995. Ozone Discourses. New York: Columbia University Press.

42.

Litfin

2003. ‘Towards an integral perspective on world politics’. Millennium 32(1): 29–56.

43.

Litfin

2010. ‘The sacred and the profane in the ecological politics of sacrifice’. In Maniates

and Meyer

(eds), The Environmental Politics of Sacrifice, pp. 117–143. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

44.

Marshall

2011. ‘Development and faith institutions’. In ter Haar

, (ed.) Religion and Development, pp. 27–53. London: Hurst.

45.

Mayring

2014. ‘Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517 (accessed 8 February 2018).

46.

Nasiritousi

, Hjerpe

and Buhr

. 2014. ‘Pluralising climate change solutions?’. Ecological Economics 105: 177–184. Crossref.

47.

Norris

, and Inglehart

. 2004. Sacred and Secular. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Peterson

2010. ‘Ordinary and extraordinary sacrifices’. In Maniates

and Meyer

(eds), The Environmental Politics of Sacrifice, pp. 91–115. Cambridge: MIT Press.

49.

Rolston

III

2006. ‘Caring for nature: What science and economics can't teach us but religion can’. Environmental Values 15(3): 307–313. Crossref.

50.

Rowe

2015. ‘Religious movement and religion's contribution to global civil society’. In Herrington

, McKay

and Haynes

(eds), Nations Under God, pp. 211–217. Bristol: E-International Relations.

51.

Scholte

J.A.

2004. Democratizing the Global Economy. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/projects/englishreport.pdf (accessed 17 January 2017).

52.

Selinger

2004. ‘The forgotten factor’. Social Compass 51(4): 521–541. Crossref.

53.

Stevenson

, and Dryzek

. 2012. ‘The discursive democratisation of global climate governance’. Environmental Politics 21(2): 189–210. Crossref.

54.

Stevenson

, and Dryzek

. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

55.

Taylor

2015. ‘Religion to the rescue (?) in an age of climate disruption’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 9(1): 7–18. Crossref.

56.

ter Haar

(ed.). 2011. Religion and Development. London: Hurst.

57.

Tomalin

2004. ‘Bio-divinity and biodiversity: Perspectives on religion and environmental conservation in India’. Numen 51(3): 265–295. Crossref.

58.

Tucker

M.E.

2003. Worldly Wonder. Chicago: Open Court.

59.

Tucker

M.E.

, and Grim

. 2001. ‘The emerging alliance of world religions and ecology’. Daedalus 130(4): 1–22.

60.

UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). 1992. ‘Rio declaration on environment and development’. Available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126–1annex1.htm (accessed 4 July 2017).

61.

UNCSD (United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development). 2012. ‘The future we want’. Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/rio20_outcome_document_complete.pdf (accessed 4 July 2017).

62.

Veldman

, Szasz

and Haluza-DeLay

. 2014a. ‘Social science, religions, and climate change’. In Veldman

, Szasz

and Haluza-DeLay

(eds), How the World's Religions are Responding to Climate Change, pp. 3–19. Milton Park: Routledge.

63.

Veldman

, Szasz

and Haluza-DeLay

(eds). 2014b. How the World's Religions are Responding to Climate Change. Milton Park: Routledge.

64.

West

, and Loomis

. 1999. The Sound of Money. New York: Norton.

65.

White

1967. ‘The historical roots of our ecologic crisis’. Science 155(3767): 1203–1207. Crossref.

66.

Wilson

2012. ‘Religion and climate change: The politics of hope and fear’. Local– Global 10: 20–29.

67.

Wolf

, and Gjerris

. 2009. ‘A religious perspective on climate change’. Studia Theologica 63(2): 119–39. Crossref.

68.

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.