Democracy and Agonism in the Anthropocene: The Challenges of Knowledge,Time and Boundary

Abstract

The diagnosis of a new geological epoch, The ‘Anthropocene’, has implications far beyond geological science. If human activity has disrupted the planet, then this diagnosis potentially disrupts socio-political conventions. This article assesses the implications the Anthropocene has for democratic politics, by delineating three challenges: challenges of knowledge, time and boundary. In contrast to the claim that democratic institutions are unable to adequately respond to these challenges, I suggest that they might be strengthened through an engagement with them. Following an ‘agonistic’ understanding of politics, I argue that the contestation instigated by the challenges of the Anthropocene is key to democratic renewal. Just as democracy in the Anthropocene can be enhanced through an agonistic approach, agonistic theory can be enriched through an engagement with the Anthropocene.

Keywords

Anthropocene environmental politics democracy agonism science

References

Baber

W.F.

and Bartlett

R.V.

. 2016. ‘Democratic accountability in the Anthropocene: Toward a non-legislative model’. In Pattberg

and Zelli

(eds), Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and legitimacy in a complex world, pp. 168–183. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

Barry

1999. Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress. London, Thousand Oaks CA and New Delhi: Sage.

Baskin

2015. ‘Paradigm dressed as epoch: the ideology of the Anthropocene’. Environmental Values 24 (1): 9–29. Crossref.

Beeson

2010. ‘The coming of environmental authoritarianism’. Environmental Politics 19 (2): 276–294. Crossref.

Biermann

2014. ‘The Anthropocene: a governance perspective’. The Anthropocene Review 1 (1): 57–61. Crossref.

Blühdorn

2015. ‘A much-needed renewal of environmentalism? Eco-politics in the Anthropocene’. In Hamilton

, Bonneuil

and Gemenne

(eds), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, pp. 156–167. London and New York: Routledge.

Bonneuil

and Fressoz

J.P.

. 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. London and New York: Verso.

Brondizio

E.S.

. 2016. ‘Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene’. Global Environmental Change. 39: 318–327. Crossref.

Brown

2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representations. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.

10.

Bulkeley

and Mol

A.P.J.

. 2003. ‘Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate’. Environmental Values. 12 (2): 143–154.

11.

Burnell

2012. ‘Democracy, democratization and climate change: complex relationships’. Democratization 19 (5): 813–842. Crossref.

12.

Castree

2015. ‘Geography and global change science: relationships necessary, absent and possible’. Geographical Research 53 (1): 1–15. Crossref.

13.

Castree

. 2014. ‘Changing the intellectual climate’. Nature Climate Change 4 (9): 763–768. Crossref.

14.

Chakrabarty

2009. ‘The climate of history: four theses’. Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. Crossref.

15.

Chakrabarty

2014. ‘Climate and capital: on conjoined histories’. Critical Inquiry 41 (4): 1–23. Crossref.

16.

Clark

2014. ‘Geo-politics and the disaster of the Anthropocene’. The Sociological Review 62 (1): 19–37. Crossref.

17.

Connolly

2005. Pluralism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

18.

Connolly

2011. A World of Becoming. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

19.

Connolly

2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies and Democratic Activism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

20.

Coulthard

G.S.

2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

21.

Crist

2013. ‘On the poverty of our nomenclature’. Environmental Humanities 3 (1): 129–147. Crossref.

22.

Crutzen

P.J.

and Stoermer

E.F.

. 2000. ‘The “Anthropocene”’. The Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.

23.

Delanty

and Mota

. 2017. ‘Governing the Anthropocene: agency, governance, knowledge’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 9–38. Crossref.

24.

Di Paola

2015. ‘Virtues for the Anthropocene’. Environmental Values 24 (2): 183–207. Crossref.

25.

Dibley

2012. ‘“The shape of things to come”: seven theses on the Anthropocene and attachment’. Australian Humanities Review 52. Crossref.

26.

Disch

2016. ‘Ecological democracy and the co-participation of things’. In Gabrielson

, Hall

, Meyer

J.M.

and Schlosberg

(eds), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

27.

Drucker

1993. ‘The rise of the knowledge society’. Wilson Quarterly 17: 52–71. Crossref.

28.

Dryzek

2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Dryzek

2014. ‘Institutions for the Anthropocene: governance in a changing Earth system’. British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 937–956. Crossref.

30.

Eckersley

2017. ‘Geopolitan democracy in the Anthropocene’. Political Studies 65 (4): 983–999. Crossref.

31.

Ercan

S. A.

and Gagnon

J.P.

. 2014. ‘The crisis of democracy: Which crisis? Which democracy?’ Democratic Theory 1 (2): 1–10. Crossref.

32.

Funtowicz

and Ravetz

. 1993. ‘Science from a post-normal age’. Futures 25 (7): 739–755. Crossref.

33.

Galston

W.A.

2001. ‘Political knowledge, political engagement and civic education. ARPS 4 (1): 217–34. Crossref.

34.

Hailwood

2016. ‘Anthropocene: delusion, celebration and concern’. In Pattberg

and Zelli

(eds), Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World, pp. 168–183. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

35.

Held

and Hervey

. 2011. ‘Democracy, climate change and global governance: democratic agency and the policy menu ahead’. In Held

, Fane-Hervey

and Theros

(eds), The Governance of Climate Change. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.

36.

Holley

, Shearing

, Harrington

, Kennedy

and Mutongwizo

. 2018. ‘Environmental security and the Anthropocene: law, criminology and international relations’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (1): 185–203. Crossref.

37.

Honig

1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

38.

Jasanoff

2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

39.

Johnson

and Morehouse

. 2014. ‘After the Anthropocene: politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch’. Progress in Human Geography 38: 439–456. Crossref.

40.

Latour

2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences Into Democracy, translated by Porter

Catherine

. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

41.

Latour

2014. ‘Agency at the time of the Anthropocene’. New Literary History 45 (1): 1–18. Crossref.

42.

Latour

2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge, Medford: Polity Press.

43.

Leach

2013. ‘Democracy in the Anthropocene? Science and sustainable development’. Huffington Post. Available at: www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/Melissa-Leach/democracy-in-the-anthropocene_b_2966341.html.

44.

Lockie

2014. ‘Climate, scenario building and governance: comprehending the temporalities of socio-ecological change’. In Lockie

, Sonnenfeld

D.A.

and Fisher

D.R.

(eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, pp. 95–105. London and New York: Routledge.

45.

Lövbrand

. 2015. ‘Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene’. Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218. Crossref.

46.

Lövbrand

, Stripple

and Wiman

. 2009. ‘Earth system governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene’. Global Environmental Change 19 (1): 7–13. Crossref.

47.

Luke

2017. ‘Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 80–94. Crossref.

48.

Machin

2019. ‘Agony and the Anthropos: Democracy and boundaries in the Anthropocene’. Nature + Culture 14 (1): 1–16.

49.

Machin

2017. ‘Sustaining democracy: science, politics and disagreement in the Anthropocene’. In Pfister

(ed.) Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften und die Suche nach neuen Wissensregimen. pp. 169–186. Munich: Metropolis.

50.

Machin

2013. Negotiating Climate Change: Radical Democracy and the Illusion of Consensus. London and New York: Zed Books.

51.

Malm

and Hornburg

. 2014. ‘The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative’. The Anthropocene Review 1 (1): 62–69. Crossref.

52.

Monastersky

2015. ‘Anthropocene: the human age’. Nature 519 (7542): 144–147. Crossref.

53.

Moore

2015. ‘The Anthropocene: a critical exploration’. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 6 (1): 1–3. Crossref.

54.

Mouffe

2013. Agonistics. London and New York: Verso.

55.

Mouffe

2005. On the Political. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

56.

Mouffe

2000. The Democratic Paradox. London and New York: Verso.

57.

Niemeyer

2014. ‘A defence of deliberative democracy in the Anthropocene’. Ethical Perspectives 21: 15–45.

58.

Norval

2009. ‘Democracy, pluralization, and voice’. Ethics and Global Politics 2 (4): 297–320. Crossref.

59.

Pahl

, Steppard

, Boomsma

and Groves

. 2014. ‘Perceptions of time in relation to climate change’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5 (3): 375–388. Crossref.

60.

Palsson

. 2013. ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research’. Environmental Science and Policy 28: 3–13. Crossref.

61.

Pattberg

and Zelli

. 2016. Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and legitimacy in a complex world. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

62.

Purdy

2015. After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

63.

Rowan

2014. ‘Notes on politics after the Anthropocene’. Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 449.

64.

Runciman

2014. Politics. London: Profile Books.

65.

Sandilands

2002. ‘Opinionated natures: toward a green public culture’. In Minteer

B.A.

and Pepperman Taylor

(eds), Democracy and the Claims of Nature, pp. 117–132. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

66.

Schaap

2009. Law and Agonistic Politics. Surrey: Ashgate.

67.

Schulz

K.A.

2017. ‘Decolonizing political ecology: ontology, technology and “critical” enchantment’. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1): 125–143. Crossref.

68.

Smith

2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge.

69.

Spash

C.L.

2015. ‘The dying planet index: life, death and man's domination of nature’. Environmental Values 24 (1): 1–7. Crossref.

70.

Sprinz

D.F.

2009. ‘Long-term environmental policy: definition, knowledge, future research’. Global Environmental Politics 9 (3): 1–8. Crossref.

71.

Steffen

. 2015. ‘Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet’. Science 347 (6223).

72.

Stehr

2001. ‘A world made of knowledge’. Society 39 (1): 89–92. Crossref.

73.

Stehr

2015. ‘Climate policy: democracy is not an inconvenience’. Nature 525 (7570): 449–450. Crossref.

74.

Suldovsky

2016. ‘In science communication, why does the idea of the public defi-cit always return? Exploring key influences’. Public Understanding of Science 25: 415–426. Crossref.

75.

Tully

2002. ‘Reimagining belonging in circumstances of cultural diversity: a citizen approach’. In Hedetoft

and Hjort

(eds), The Postnational Self: Belonging and Identity pp. 152–214. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

76.

Tully

1999. ‘The agonic freedom of citizens’. Economy and Society 28 (2): 161–182. Crossref.

77.

Vermeulen

2017. ‘Creaturely memory: Shakespeare, the Anthropocene and the new nomos of the Earth’. Parallax 23 (4): 384–397. Crossref.

78.

Wainwright

and Mann

. 2013. ‘Climate leviathan’. Antipode 45 (1): 1–22. Crossref.

79.

Wapner

2014. ‘The changing nature of nature: environmental politics in the Anthropocene’. Global Environmental Politics 14 (4): 36–54. Crossref.

80.

Wenman

2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

81.

Wilke

2013. ‘Anthropocenic poetics: ethics and aesthetics in a new geological age’. In Trischler

, (ed.) Anthropocene: Exploring the Future of the Age of Humans, pp. 67–74. RCC Perspectives 3.

82.

Whyte

2017. ‘Indigenous climate change studies: indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene’. English Language Notes 55 (1–2): 153–162. Crossref.