In this paper I identify and respond to four persistent objections to the idea of wilderness: empirical, cultural, philosophical and environmental. Despite having dogged the wilderness debate for decades, none of these objections withstands scrutiny; rather they are misplaced criticisms that hinder fruitful discussion of the philosophical ramifications of wilderness by needlessly complicating the idea itself. While there may be other justifiable concerns about the idea of wilderness, it is time to move beyond the four discussed in this paper.
BirnbacherD.2014. Naturalness: Is the ‘Natural’ Preferable to the ‘Artificial’?Langham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
2.
CallicottJ.B.1998. ‘The Wilderness Idea Revisited: The Sustainable Development Alternative’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp. 337–366. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
3.
CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds). 1998. The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
4.
CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds). 2008. The Wilderness Debate Rages On. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
5.
CristE.2004. ‘Against the social construction of nature and wilderness’. Environmental Ethics26 (1): 5–24. Crossref.
6.
CrononW.1998. ‘The trouble with wilderness, or, getting back to the wrong nature’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp. 471–499. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
7.
DeLanceyC.2012. ‘An ecological concept of wilderness’. Ethics and the Environment17 (1): 25–44. Crossref.
8.
DombrowskiD.2002. ‘Bears, zoos, and wilderness: the poverty of social constructionism’. Society & Animals10 (2): 195–202. Crossref.
9.
EverndenN.1992. The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gomez-PompaA. and KausA.. 1998. ‘Taming the Wilderness Myth’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp. 293–313. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
12.
GuhaR.1998. ‘Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp. 231–245. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
13.
HailwoodS.2000. ‘The value of nature's otherness’. Environmental Values9 (3): 353–372. Crossref.
JamiesonD.2008. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KeelingP.2008. ‘Does the idea of wilderness need a defense?’ Environmental Values17 (4): 505–519. Crossref.
17.
KirchhoffT. and VicenzottiV.. 2014. ‘A historical and systematic survey of European perceptions of wilderness’. Environmental Values23 (4): 443–464. Crossref.
McKibbenW.1990. The End of Nature. New York: Anchor Books.
20.
MillJ.S.2000 [1874]. ‘Nature’. In BensonJ. (ed.), Environmental Ethics: An Introduction with Readings. London: Routledge.
21.
NagleJ.2005. ‘The spiritual value of wilderness’. Environmental Law35 (4): 955–959.
22.
O'NeillJ.2008. ‘Wilderness, Cultivation, and Appropriation’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Wilderness Debate Rages On, pp. 526–546. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
23.
OelschlaegerM.1991. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
OrrD.2008. ‘The Not-So-Great Wilderness Debate…Continued’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Wilderness Debate Rages On, pp. 423–434. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
25.
PassmoreJ.1974. Man's Responsibility for Nature; Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. New York: Scribner.
26.
RolstonH.III1998. ‘The Wilderness Idea Reaffirmed’. In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp. 367–386. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
27.
SagoffM.1984. ‘Animal liberation and environmental ethics: bad marriage, quick divorce’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal22 (2): 297–307.
28.
SnyderG.2008. ‘Is Nature Real?’ In CallicottJ.B. and NelsonM. (eds), The Wilderness Debate Rages On, pp. 352–354. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
29.
VogelS.2002. ‘Environmental philosophy after the end of nature’. Environmental Ethics24 (1): 23–29. Crossref.
