A Green Intervention in Media Production Culture Studies: Environmental Values,Political Economy and Mobile Production

Abstract

This article develops an interdisciplinary theoretical method for assessing the environmental values articulated and practised by dispersive or ‘mobile’ film production practices, aiming toward applicable strategies to make media practices more environmentally conscientious and sustainable. Providing a social and environmental study of the local relational values, political economy and ecosystem ramifications of runaway productions and film incentive programmes, this study draws on contemporary international green production practices as entryways into environmentally positive film industry change. Offering an overview of the potential use of a relational values approach to media production cultures, the essay uses two opposing models (the Michigan film incentive and the underwater cinematography culture of South Florida) in order to assess the political dynamics, social consequences and environmental threats of Hollywood's mobile practices – as well as their potential as sites, beyond Hollywood, to converge environmental values with local media culture.

Keywords

Ecocriticism relational values environmental media production culture studies film and media studies sustainability

References

Arias-Arévalo

, Martín-López

and Gómez-Baggethun

. 2017. ‘Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems’. Ecology and Society 22 (4): 43. Crossref.

Press

Associated

. 2002. More Productions are Using Florida as a Backdrop. The Gainesville Sun. Available at: http://www.gainesville.com/news/20021017/more-productions-are-using-forida-as-a-backdrop (accessed 7 October 2017).

Binelli

2013. Detroit Is the Place to Be. New York: Picador.

Chan

Kai M.A.

, Balvanera

, Benessaiah

, Chapman

, Díaz

, Gómez-Baggethun

, Gould

, Hannahs

, Jax

and Klain

. 2016. ‘Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (6): 1462–1465.

Chan

, Gould

and Pascual

. 2018. ‘Editorial overview: Relational values: what are they, and what's the fuss about?’ Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: A1–A7. Crossref.

Climate Nexus study https://climatenexus.org/wp-content/uploads/Iowa-Voters-Support-Climate-Action.pdf (viewed 13 November 2019).

Corbett

and Turco

. 2006. Southern California Environmental Report Card 2006: Sustainability in the Motion Picture Industry. UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Deruvo

2016. ‘Film Companies Leave Florida Tax breaks Expire’. Available at: www.doddlenews.com/news-room/film-companies-leave-forida-tax-breaks-ex-pire/ (accessed 7 October 2017).

Elmer

, Davis

C.H.

, Marchessault

and McCullough

(eds). 2010. Locating Migrating Media. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.

10.

Gleich

and Webb

(eds). 2019. Hollywood On Location. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

11.

Hourdequin

2015. Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice. Bloomsbury: London. Crossref.

12.

Howell

, Doan

and Harbin

. 2019. ‘Detroit to Flint and back again: solidarity forever’. Critical Sociology 45: 63–83. Crossref.

13.

Jacobson

2015. Studios Before the System. New York: Columbia University Press.

14.

Kääpä

2018. Environmental Management of the Media: Policy, Industry, Practice. London: Routledge.

15.

Landman

2009. “‘Not in Kansas Anymore”: Transnational Collaboration in Television Science Fiction Production’. In Mayer

, Banks

and Caldwell

(eds), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries, pp. 140–153. London/New York: Routledge.

16.

Lukinbeal

2012. “‘On Location” filming in San Diego County from 1985–2005: how a cinematic landscape is formed through incorporative tasks and represented through mapped inscriptions’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (1): 171–190. Crossref.

17.

Lundberg

, Ziakis

and Morgan

. 2018. ‘Conceptualising on-screen tourism destination development’. Tourist Studies 18 (1): 83–104. Crossref.

18.

Maxwell

and Miller

. 2012. Greening the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Mayer

2017. Almost Hollywood, Nearly New Orleans: The Lure of the Local Film Economy. Oakland: University of California Press. Crossref.

20.

Mayer

2009. ‘Bringing the social back in: studies of production cultures and social theory’. In Mayer

, Banks

and Caldwell

(eds), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries, pp. 15–24. London/New York: Routledge.

21.

McKim

2013. Cinema as Weather. New York: Routledge. Crossref.

22.

McNutt

2015. ‘Mobile production: spatialized labor, location professionals, and the expanding geography of television production’. Media Industries 2 (1) (https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mij/15031809.0002.104/–mobile-production-spatialized-labor-location-professionals?rgn=main;view=fulltext) (viewed 13 November 2019) Crossref.

23.

Miller

S.R.

and Abdulhadi

. 2009. ‘The Economic Impact of Michigan's Motion Picture Production Industry and the Michigan Motion Picture Production Credit’. East Lansing: Michigan State University Center for Economic Analysis.

24.

Miller

, Govil

, McMurria

, and Maxwell

. 2001. Global Hollywood. London: British Film Institute.

25.

Miller

and Yúdice

. 2002. Cultural Policy. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217207.

26.

Neuteleers

2019. ‘A fresh look at “relational” values in nature: distinctions derived from the debate on meaningfulness in life’. Environmental Values 29: 461–479. Crossref.

27.

Ortner

2013. Not Hollywood. Durham: Duke University Press.

28.

Parmett

H.M.

2018. ‘Site-specific television as urban renewal: Or, how Portland became Portlandia’. International Journal of Cultural Studies International Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (1): 42–56. Crossref.

29.

Parmett

H.M.

2012. ‘Space, place, and New Orleans on television: from Frank's Place to Treme’. Television & New Media 13 (3): 193–212. Crossref.

30.

Pascual

, Balvanera

, Diaz

, Pataki

, Roth

, Stenseke

, Watson

R.T.

, Dessane

E.B.

, Islar

and Kelemen

. 2017. ‘Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 7–16. Crossref.

31.

Pearce

2009. ‘Greenwash: Disney's green intentions are pure fantasy’. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/mar/19/disney-greenwash-fred-pearce (accessed 22 June 2018).

32.

Powdermaker, H. 1950/2013. Hollywood: The Dream Factory. Manfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.

33.

Staff

Reuters

. 2018. ‘Thai beach made famous by film’. Available at: ‘Thai bay made famous by film “The Beach” to close for four months’, 23 May 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-tourism/thai-bay-made-famous-by-film-the-beach-to-close-for-four-months-idUSKCN1IO0KF (accessed 14 June 2018).

34.

Robb

2016. ‘Deadline Hollywood’. Available at: www.deadline.com/2016/10/koch-brothers-forida-film-industry-tax-incentives-lobbying-1201838246/ (accessed 22 June 2018).

35.

Schneider

2004. ‘Setting up roots, or the anthropologist on the set: observations on the shooting of a cinema movie in Mapuche Reservation, Argentina’. In Grimshaw

and Ravetz

(eds), Visualizing Anthropology, pp. 100–115. Chicago: Intellect.

36.

Scott

2014. On Hollywood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

37.

Sinclair

2013. “‘The Hollywood of Latin America”: Miami as regional center in television trade’. Television & New Media 4 (3): 211–229. Crossref.

38.

Starosielski

2015. The Undersea Network. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

39.

Story

2012. ‘Michigan Town Woos Hollywood, but Ends Up With Bit Part’. New York Times. Available at www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/us/when-hollywood-comes-to-town.html (accessed 22 June 2018).

40.

Vaughan

2019. Hollywood's Dirtiest Secret: the Hidden Environmental Costs of the Movies. New York: Columbia University Press. Crossref.

41.

Ward

2004. ‘Berlin, the virtual global city’. Visual Culture 3 (2): 239–256 (250). Crossref.

42.

West

, Haider

L.J.

, Masterson

, Penquist

, Svedin

and Tengo

. 2018. ‘Stewardship, care and relational values’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 30–38. Crossref.

43.

Zin

2010. ‘Film incentives in Michigan’, Senate Fiscal Agency. https://www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa/publications/issues/filmincentives.pdf (accessed 21 May 2015).