The iSchool movement is a controversial topic within the library and information science (LIS) community. While some argue that the movement isolates small size schools and splits the LIS community others insist it will broaden the field of LIS and form an open and boundaryless iField. This study investigates the evolution of the iSchool movement by analyzing the trends of subject terms in LIS doctoral dissertations since 1970s. The results indicate that the iSchool movement reflects the trend of LIS in terms of the change of the dominant research topics and the degree of interdisciplinarity.
DillonA., LIS as a research domain: problems and prospects, Information Research12(4) (2007).
2.
SaracevicT., Information Science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science50(12) (1999), 1051-1063.
3.
HolmesB.P., The domain of information science, with an emphasis on contributing disciplines: 1973 to 1998 [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor: The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2002.
4.
TangR., Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology41(1) (2004), 54-63.
5.
DillonA., What it Means to be an iSchool, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science53(4) (2012), 267-273.
6.
BruceH., The Audacious Vision of Information Schools, Journal of Library and Information Science (Taipei)37(1) (2011), 4-10.
7.
KingJ.L., Identity in the I-school movement, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology32(4), 13-5.
8.
FinlayC.S., SugimotoC.R., LiD. and RussellT.G., LIS Dissertation Titles and Abstracts (1930-2009): Where Have All the Librar* Gone?Library Quarterly82(1) (2012), 29-46.
9.
SugimotoC.R., LiD., RussellT.G., FinlayS.C. and DingY., The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62(1) (2011), 185-204.
10.
LarivièreV., SugimotoC.R. and CroninB., A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(5) (2012), 997-1016.
11.
ChangY.-W. and HuangM.-H., A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(1) (2012), 22-33.
12.
PreborG., Information science - facing social and ethical challenges: analysis of masters' theses and doctoral dissertations over the past five years (2002-2006) in information science departments worldwide, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society5(2-3) (2007), 253-269.
13.
WigginsA. and SawyerS., Intellectual Diversity and the Faculty Composition of iSchools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(1) (2012), 8-21.
14.
LuoL., Being Interdisciplinary: A Look into the Background and Experiences of iSchool Faculty Members, LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal23(2) (2013), 1-20.
15.
WuD., HeD., JiangJ., DongW. and VoK.T., The state of iSchools: An analysis of academic research and graduate education, Journal of Information Science38(1) (2012), 15-36.
16.
HolmbergK., TsouA. and SugimotoC.R., The Conceptual Landscape of iSchools: Examining Current Research Interests of Faculty Members, Information Research18(3) (2013), Special Sulement [np].
17.
ChuH., iSchools and Non-iSchools in the USA: An Examination of Their Master's Programs, Education for Information29(1) (2012), 1-17.
18.
WedgeworthR., Certain characteristics of iSchools compared to other LIS programs [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor: Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2013.
19.
OlsonG.M. and GrudinJ., The information school phenomenon, Interactions16(2) (2009), 15-19.
20.
BrynkoB., iSchools: Shaping the Information Landscape, Information Today. Sep 2012, 1-35.
21.
CarboT., Teaching and Learning in the iSchools, Journal of Education for Library & Information Science53(4) (2012), 223.
22.
BonniciL.J., SubramaniamM.M. and BurnettK., Everything Old is New Again: The Evolution of Library and Information Science Education from LIS to iField, Journal of Education for Library & Information Science50(4) (2009), 263-274.
23.
WallaceD.P., The iSchools, Education for Librarianship, and the Voice of Doom and Gloom, Journal of Academic Librarianship35(5) (2009), 405-409.
24.
LeonhardtT.W., Library and Information Science Education, Technicalities27(2) (2007), 3-6.
25.
JohnsonI., Education for Librarianship and Information Studies: Fit for purpose?Information Development25(3) (2009), 175-177.
26.
O'ConnorD. and ParkS., Crisis in LIS research capacity, Library and Information Science Research23(2) (2001), 103-106.
27.
HouserL.J., The Phd dissertation in library science, Library Research4(1) (1982).
28.
SugimotoC.R., RussellT.G. and GrantS., Library and Information Science Doctoral Education: The Landscape from 1930-2007, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science50(3) (2009), 190-202.
29.
The MPACT Project [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.ibiblio.org/mpact/.
30.
Gephi. 0.8.2 ed: Gephi Consortium; 2015.
31.
CoxR.J. and LarsenR.L., iSchools and archival studies, Arch Sci Archival Science: International Journal on Recorded Information8(4) (2008), 307-326.
