Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Several recent studies have assessed suitability of tumor antigens for immunotherapy. Based on the restricted expression pattern in somatic tissues, cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) are possible candidates for cancer immunotherapy. These antigens are expressed in various tumors including gastrointestinal, breast, skin and hematologic malignancies.
OBJECTIVES:
To find clinical trials utilizing CTAs in cancer patients.
METHODS:
We searched PubMed, google scholar and specific websites that registers clinical trials.
RESULTS:
A number of clinical trials have been designed to evaluate safety and efficacy of CTA-based treatments. The results of some of them have been promising. In the current literature search, we summarized the clinical trials of CTA-based therapies in cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based on the availability of different formulations of CTA-based vaccines, future researches should compare efficiency of these modalities.
Background
Summary of the clinical trials utilizing CTAs-based therapies in cancer patients (only currently recruiting studies are included, data have been obtained from https://clinicaltrials.gov )
Summary of the clinical trials utilizing CTAs-based therapies in cancer patients (only currently recruiting studies are included, data have been obtained from
Summary of the clinical trials utilizing CTAs-based therapies in cancer patients (only completed studies are included, data have been obtained from
Summary of the withdrawn clinical trials utilizing CTAs-based therapies in cancer patients (data have been obtained from
Restricted expression of a group of antigens in gametogenic and tumor tissues has resulted in nomination of these antigens as cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) [1, 2]. Based on the unavailability of testis antigens for immune system [3], CTAs are suitable candidates for cancer immunotherapy [4, 5, 6, 7]. Although CTAs are expressed in the majority of tumor samples, studies have failed to find a single CTA with unanimous expression across all specimens [8]. The presence of immune responses against CTAs has been documented in cancer patients. For instance, Oka et al. have detected robust immune responses against the XAGE1 CTA in lung adenocarcinoma patients who had high disease stages. Notably, they found associations between humoral responses and good patients’ outcome [9]. Evaluation of CTAs whose expressions have been associated with good patients’ outcome has led to find associations between CTA expression and cytotoxic T cells infiltration in some kinds of cancer [10]. Although similarities have been detected between CTA roles in normal and tumoral tissues [11], some preliminary studies indicate that they might have different roles in the gametogenic and tumor tissues [12, 13]. They have been firstly detected in melanoma [14]. Subsequently, immunological responses against them have been recognized in various malignant situations [15, 16]. Moreover, numerous investigations have shown expressions of CTAs in almost all types of malignancies including solid tumors [17, 18, 19, 20] and blood cancers [21, 22, 23]. Some CTAs such as PAS domain containing 1 (PASD1) has been shown to induce autologous T-cell responses in blood cancer patients [24].
We searched PubMed, google scholar and specific websites that registers clinical trials with the key words “cancer-testis antigen”, “clinical trial”, “cancer” and “malignancy”.
Results
Several clinical trials have assessed efficacy of CTA-based immunotherapeutic approaches in cancer patients [7, 25, 26]. However, their application in pediatric cancer has been limited [27]. Different formulations have been used in the clinical trials [28]. For example, the whole protein with an appropriate adjuvant [29, 30], selected peptides [31, 32, 33], genetically engineered dendritic cells (DCs) [34, 35], cancer cell lysate-pulsed autologous DC [36] or capsid-mutant vector [37] have been applied in different settings. In breast cancer patients, combinations of some CTAs have been shown to induce immune response in a high number of patients [38]. A number of studies have been already recruiting patients to assess their response to these treatments. The results of other studies have been published. For instance, Fujita et al. have conducted a phase I clinical trial in patients with high stage breast cancer using five CTAs. They reported induction of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in the majority of patients [39]. Wada et al. have reported stimulation of NY-ESO-1 immunity and some desirable clinical results in esophageal cancer patients after immunotherapy with NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein [40]. Sadanaga et al. have vaccinated cancer patients with MAGE3-pulsed DCs and detected CTL responses and favorable clinical outcomes in a subset of patients [41]. Others have shown induction systemic immune response in melanoma patients after administration of imiquimod in addition to NY-ESO-1 vaccine [42]. Totally, two CTAs namely MAGE-A3 and NY-ESO-1 have been used more frequently than others in clinical trials [43, 44]. A phase II clinical trial in melanoma patients using a 12-peptide mix has reported induction of immune response in association with clinical effects in patients [45]. Bender et al. detected fast initiation of extensive NY-ESO-1 peptide specific immune responses following vaccination with the related peptide [46]. Davis et al. have detected both humoral and cellular responses against several NY-ESO-1 epitopes after vaccination with recombinant NY-ESO-1 protein in addition to ISCOMATRIX adjuvant [47]. Administration of NY-ESO-1b and Montanide has induced immune responses in ovarian cancer patients as well [48]. Another study in esophageal cancer patients showed acceptable safety, immunological responses and hopeful disease control degree after administration of a combination of three CTA-derived peptides [49]. A phase I clinical trial in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer demonstrated induction of plasmacytoid DCs and natural killer cells, and augmented concentrations of Interferon
Tables 1 and 2 summarize the clinical trials utilizing CTAs-based therapies in cancer patients. Table 3 gives a summary of clinical trials that have been withdrawn due to technical or clinical problems.
Discussion
CTAs have an acknowledged role in the diagnosis of human cancers [51] especially in residual diseases [23, 52]. Moreover, their expression on malignant cells with stem cell features potentiates them as treatment targets [53]. They have parallel functions in stem cell differentiation and tumorigenesis [54]. However, their expression in normal stem cells might limit their use as immunotherapeutic targets [55]. Several studies have aimed at identification of their potential as treatment targets in cell lines [56, 57, 58], animal models [59, 60], clinical samples [61, 62, 63] and clinical trials [64]. Targeting CTAs can enhance efficiency of other therapeutic methods as well [65]. Yet, expression of some previously named CTAs has been detected in normal tissues [66]. Consequently, caution should be taken in the attribution of genes to this group of tumor antigens. Immunotherapeutic modalities take advantage of antigens with more restricted expression in normal tissues [67]. Recent studies indicate that certain panels of CTAs can be used in diagnosis of cancer in tissue samples or body fluids [68, 69, 70]. Therefore, expression levels of these CTAs can be used in the follow-up of patients after treatments strategies. Based on the availability of different formulations of CTA-based vaccines, future researches should compare efficiency of these modalities. As current methods did not accomplish the whole aspects of an efficacious treatment strategy [71], this field is open for further investigations. Their applications in tumors arose from immune-privileged sites as well as tissues with high levels of immune tolerance have resulted in some promising outcomes [72, 73].
Conclusion
Application of CTAs in clinical trials has encountered some problems including lack of appropriate response, scarcity of appropriate candidates and adverse effects. So, comprehensive assessment of all confounding parameters is required before conduction of trials.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
