The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate activities of daily living (ADL) functioning for clients in a forensic psychiatry evaluation unit and also to investigate the relationship between ADL functioning and awareness of their ability to perform ADL.
Method:
The sample consisted of 35 participants at a forensic psychiatry evaluation unit in Sweden. ADL was investigated using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) and awareness of ability was investigated using the Assessment of Awareness of Ability (A3).
Results:
The ADL mean motor ability for the participants was 1.68 logits and the process ability showed an ADL mean value of 0.83 logit. The mean value of awareness was 0.60 logit. A majority of the participants demonstrated ability measures below the cut-off criteria in the AMPS, which indicates that they might need support to function in the community. There was also a significant relationship between awareness of ability and ADL motor ability (rho = 0.49, p<0.01) and ADL process ability (rho = 0.77, p<0.01).
Conclusion:
Clients in forensic psychiatry demonstrate limited ability in ADL, associated with a limited awareness. Clients in forensic psychiatry may also need assistance to live in the community, which suggests that occupational therapy may be offered to these clients in order to prepare them to manage in the community.
AndersonRDobleSMerrittBKottorpA (2009) Assessment of awareness of disability (AAD) measures among persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(1), 22–29.
2.
BernspångBFisherAG (1995) Validation of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills for use in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2(1), 3–9.
3.
BondTGFoxCM (2001) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Computer Adaptive Technologies, Fisher AG (1994–96) AMPS computer-scoring program (Version 1). Chicago: Computer Adaptive Technologies.
5.
CrossonBBarcoPPVelozoCABolestaMMCooperPVWertsDBrobeckT (1989) Awareness and compensation in postacute head injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 4(3), 46–54.
6.
DrostM (1997) Personality disorders: The challenge for residential treatment. In: van MarleH, ed. Challenges in forensic psychiatry. London: Jessica Kingsley, 53–62.
7.
DuncanEASMunroKNicolMM (2003) Research priorities in forensic occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(2), 55–64.
8.
FisherAG (2010) Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Development, standardization and administration manual (7th ed., Vol. 1). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
9.
GreenM (2000) Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: Are we measuring the right stuff?Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 119–36.
10.
HällgrenMKottorpA (2005) Effects of occupational therapy intervention on activities of daily living and awareness of disability in persons with intellectual disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 350–59.
11.
HochbergerJFisher-JamesL (1992) A discharge group for the chronically mentally ill. Easing the way. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 30(4), 25–27.
12.
HodginsS (2002) Research priorities in forensic mental health. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(1), 7–23.
13.
KottorpA (2011) Assessment of Awareness of Ability (A3). Development, administration, and interpretation. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
14.
KottorpAPeterssonI (2011) Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(3), 219–30.
15.
KottorpABernspångBFisherAG (2003) Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living (ADL) in persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(8), 597–605.
16.
KottorpAEkstamLPeterssonI (2013) Differences in awareness between persons with left and right hemispheric stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(1), 37–44.
LindqvistPSkipworthJ (2000) Evidence-based rehabilitation in forensic psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 320–23.
19.
LindstedtH (2006) Daily occupations in mentally disordered offenders in Sweden: Exploring occupational performance and social participation. Uppsala: Department of Public Health and Care Sciences, Uppsala University.
20.
LindstedtHSöderlundAStålenheimGSjödénP-O (2004) Mentally disordered offenders' abilities in occupational performance and social participation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11(3), 118–27.
21.
LloydC (1987) The use of the Bay area functional performance evaluation with a forensic population. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 7–13.
22.
LloydC (1988a) Discharge preparation for the forensic psychiatric patient: A proposed model. Journal of the New Zealand Association of Occupational Therapists, 39, 12–14.
23.
LloydC (1988b) The role of the occupational therapist in forensic psychiatry. In: ScottDKatzN, eds. Occupational therapy in mental health: Principles in practice. London: Taylor and Francis, 181–95.
24.
LloydC (1995) Trends in forensic psychiatry. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(5), 209–13.
25.
MasonTCartonG (2002) Towards a ‘forensic lens’ model of multidisciplinary training. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9(5), 541–51.
26.
McGlynnSMSchachterDL (1989) Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(2), 143–205.
27.
MerrittBK (2010) Utilizing AMPS ability measures to predict level of community dependence. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(1), 70–76.
28.
ÖhmanANygårdLKottorpA (2011) Occupational performance and awareness of disability in mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(2), 133–42.
29.
PrigatanoGPSchachterDL, eds (1991) Awareness of deficits after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
SeekN (1989) The New Zealand prison system. Journal of the New Zealand Association of Occupational Therapists, 40, 16–19.
31.
TesioL (2003) Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitaion Medicine, 35, 105–15.
32.
ThamKBernspångBFisherAG (1999) Development of the Assessment of Awareness of Disability. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 6(4), 184–90.
33.
ThamKBorellLGustavssonA (2000) The discovery of disability: A phenomenological study of unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(4), 398–406.
34.
ThamKGinsburgEFisherAGTegnerR (2001) Training to improve awareness of disabilities in clients with unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(1), 46–54.
35.
TryssenaarJWilkinsonSBaileyC (2000) Homelessness, mental health and occupational therapy. Sante Mentale Au Quebec, 25(2), 109–31.
