Comparing Communal Environments Using the Assessment Tool for Occupation and Social Engagement: Using Interactive Occupation and Social Engagement as Outcome Measures
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2014
Comparing Communal Environments Using the Assessment Tool for Occupation and Social Engagement: Using Interactive Occupation and Social Engagement as Outcome Measures
Interactive occupation and social engagement are important components of quality of life for residents with dementia in nursing homes. Communal living spaces should be evaluated on these qualities. Two Irish nursing homes were compared pre and post conversion from a traditional to a household model unit using the Assessment Tool for Occupation and Social Engagement. This assessment uses interactive occupation and social engagement as positive outcome measures.
Method:
Residents, staff, and relatives were observed pre and post renovation over a 6-week period using a snapshot observational method over 4 hours on 7 different weekdays.
Findings:
Changing from a traditional to a household model nursing home increased the interactive occupation and social engagement of residents, staff, and visitors within the communal living areas. The role of a homemaker in the household unit was critical for maintaining residents' participation and engagement, including engaging in familiar everyday domestic tasks.
Conclusion:
Interactive occupation and social engagement were significantly increased in the household model unit over the traditional model unit, particularly for residents. In the household model unit, more residents initiated and maintained their own interactions within the communal environment and did not require prompting from staff to do this.
AlbertSM (2004) The special care unit as a quality-of-life intervention for people with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52 (7), 1214–1215.
2.
BrymanA (2008) Social research method. 3rd ed.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
CalkinsMP (2009) Evidence-based long term care design. NeuroRehabilitation, 25 (3), 145–154.
4.
CalkinsMP (2005) Learning from doing: conducting a SAGE postoccupancy evaluation. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 6 (4), 357–365.
5.
CalkinsMP (2003) Powell Lawton's contributions to long-term care settings. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 17 (1/2), 67–84.
6.
CantleyCWoodhouseJSmithM (2005) Listen to us: Involving people with dementia in planning and developing services. Newcastle upon Tyne: Dementia North, Northumbria University.
7.
CooperBAAhrentzenSHasselkusBR (1991) Post-occupancy evaluation: an environment-behaviour technique for assessing the built environment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (4), 181–188.
8.
CutlerLJ (2007) Physical environments of assisted living: research needs and challenges. The Gerontologist, 47 (Special Issue III), 68–82.
9.
GerringJ (2007) Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
GreenSCooperBA (2000) Occupation as a quality of life constituent: a nursing home perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (1), 17–24.
11.
HasselkusBR (1998) Occupation and well-being in dementia: the experience of day-care staff. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52 (6), 423–434.
12.
InnesAKellyFDincarslanO (2011) Care home design for people with dementia: what do people with dementia and their family carers value?Aging & Mental Health, 15 (5), 548–556.
13.
LawtonMP (2001) The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer's disease. Aging and Mental Health, 5 (Suppl 1), S56–S64.
14.
LawtonMPNahemowL (1973) Ecology and the Aging Process. In: EisdorferCLawtonMP ed. The psychology of adult development and aging. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 619–674.
15.
MooreKD (2004) Interpreting the “hidden program” of a place: an example from dementia day care. Journal of Aging Studies, 18 (3), 297–320.
16.
Morgan-BrownM (2013) Changes in interactive occupation and social engagement for people with dementia: Comparing household to traditional nursing home environments in Ireland. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Salford, Salford. Available at: http://usirsalford.acuk/id/eprint/30253 Accessed 20.01.14.
17.
Morgan-BrownMNewtonROrmerodM (2013) Engaging life in two Irish nursing home units for people with dementia: quantitative comparisons before and after implementing household environments. Aging & Mental Health, 17 (1), 57–65.
18.
Morgan-BrownMOrmerodMNewtonRManleyD (2011) An exploration of occupation in nursing home residents with dementia. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (5), 217–225.
19.
PereiraRBWhitefordGE (2013) Understanding social inclusion as an international discourse: implications for enabling participation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76 (2), 112–115.
20.
PollardNSakellarionDLawson-PorterA (2010) Will occupational science facilitate or divide the practice of occupational therapy?International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 17 (1), 40–47.
21.
ProshanskyHM (1976) Environmental psychology and the real world. American Psychologist, 31 (4), 303–310.
22.
ProshanskyHMIttelsonWHRivlinLG (1970) The influence of the physical envionment on behavior: Some basic assumptions. In: ProshanskyHMIttelsonWHRivlinLG, ed. Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.27–37.
23.
RobertsonLFitzgeraldR (2010) The conceptualisation of residential home environments: implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73 (4), 170–177.
24.
RobsonC (2002) Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner—researchers. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
RowlesGD (2000) Habituation and being in place. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20 (Supplement 1), 52S–67S.
26.
SchulzR (2001) Some critical issues in caregiver intervention research. Aging & Mental Health, 5 (Suppl 1), S112–S115.
27.
ShieldsSNortonL (2006) In Pursuit of the Sunbeam: a practical guide to transformation from institution to household. USA: Action Pact Press.
28.
TorringtonJ (2006) What has architecture got to do with dementia care? explorations of the relationship between quality of life and building design in two EQUAL projects. Quality in Ageing, 7 (1), 34–48.
29.
TurpinMJIwamaMK (2010) Using Occupational Therapy Models in Practice: A Field Guide. London: Churchill Livingstone.
30.
Van HaitsmaKLawtonMPKlebanMHKlapperJCornJ (1997) Methodological aspects of the study of streams of behavior in elders with dementing illness. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11 (4), 228–238.
31.
Van't LevenNJonssonH (2002) Doing and being in the atmosphere of the doing: Environmental influences on occupational performance in a nursing home. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9 (4), 148–155.
32.
WahlHWWeismanGD (2003) Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: reflections on its historical, empirical and theoretical development. The Gerontologist, 43 (5), 616–627.
33.
WhitefordG (2000) Occupational deprivation: global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (5), 200–204.
34.
WoodWHarrisSSniderMPPatchelSA (2005) Activity situations on an Alzheimer's disease special care unit and resident environmental interactions, time use, and affect. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 20 (2), 105–118.
35.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd ed.London: Sage Publications.
36.
ZaritSHLeitschSA (2001) Developing and evaluating community based intervention programs for Alzheimer's patients and their caregivers. Aging & Mental Health, 5 (Suppl 1), S84–S98.
37.
ZeiselJ (2006) Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. revised Edition.London: WW Norton & Company.
38.
ZeiselJ (2005) Environment, neuroscience, and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 6 (4), 273–279.
