Transportation Research Board.Special Report 282: Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use; 2005.
2.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention.Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical activity—selected states, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;47:143–146.
3.
Loukaitou-SiderisA. Is it safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and security considerations and their effects on walking. J Plan Lit. 2006;20:219–232.
4.
KoskelaH. Bold walk and breakings: Women's spatial confidence versus fear of violence. Gender, Place, and Culture. 1997;4:304.
5.
KoskelaHPainR. Revisiting fear and place: Women's fear of attack and the built environment. Geoforum. 2000;31:269–280.
6.
ValentineG. Women's fear and the design of public space. Built Environ. 1990;16:288–303.
7.
FerraroK. Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1995.
8.
GordonMRigerS. The Female Fear. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1989.
9.
DayK. Constructing masculinity and women's fear in public space in Irvine, California. Gender, Place, and Culture. 2001;8:109–127.
10.
KingACCastroCWilcoxS. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychol. 2000;19:354–364.
11.
JohnsonCACorriganSADubbertPMGramlingSE. Perceived barriers to exercise and weight control practices in community women. Women Health. 1990;16:177–191.
12.
EylerAABakerECromerL. Physical activity and minority women: A qualitative study. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:640–652.
RossCE. Walking, exercising, and smoking: Does neighborhood matter?Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:265–274.
15.
StankoE. Everyday Violence: Women's and Men's Experience of Personal Danger. London, UK: Pandora; 1990.
16.
WekerleGWhitzmanC. Safe Cities: Guidelines for Planning, Design and Management. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1995.
17.
LynchGAtkinsS. The influence of personal security fears on women's travel patterns. Transportation. 1988;15:255–277.
18.
CranzG. Women in urban parks. Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1980;5:79–95.
19.
CooperMarcus CFrancisC, eds. People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinholt; 1990.
20.
Loukaitou-SiderisA. Urban form and social context: Cultural differentiation in the uses of neighborhood parks. J Plan Educ Res. 1995;14:89–102.
21.
WilburJChandlerPDancyB. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in urban, African-American women. Women Health. 2002;36:17–28.
22.
ThompsonJLAllenPCunningham-SaboL. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in sedentary American Indian women. Women Health. 2002;36:59–74.
23.
EvensonKRSarmientoOLMaconML. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity among Latina immigrants. Women Health. 2002;36:43–57.
24.
SeefeldtVMalinaRMClarkMA. Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults. Sports Med. 2002;32:143–168.
25.
AmestySC. Barriers to physical activity in the Hispanic community. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24:41–58.
26.
SeefeldtV, ed. Recreating Recreation and Sports in Detroit, Hamtramck and Highland Park: Final Report to the Skillman Foundation. Detroit, Mich: The Skillman Foundation; 1995.
27.
Transportation Research Board.Special Report 269: The Relative Risks to School Travel. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. 2002.
28.
ValentineGMcKendrickJH. Children's outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children's safety and changing nature of childhood. Geoforum. 1997;28:219–235.
29.
KingACRejeskiWJBuchnerDM. Physical activity interventions targeting older adults. A critical review and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:316–333.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Safety of Vulnerable Road Users (DSTI/DOT/RTR/RS7(98)1FINAL). Paris, France: Directorate for Science, Technology, and Industry, Scientific Expert Group on the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users; 1998.
32.
BrownsonRCHousemanRABrownDR. Promoting physical activity in rural communities. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:235–241.
33.
TropedPJSaundersRPPateRR. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med. 2001;32:191–200.
34.
BoothMLOwenNBaumanA. Social-cognitive and perceived environmental influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Prev Med. 2000;31:15–22.
35.
CraigCLBrownsonRCCraggSEDunnAL. Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(2S):36–43.
36.
MooreBJGlickNRomanowskiBQuinleyH. Neighborhood safety, child care, and high costs of fruit and vegetables identified as barriers to increased activity and healthy eating and linked to overweight and income [abstract]. FASEB J. 1996;10:A562.
37.
HumpelNOwenNLeslieE. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:188–199.
38.
TaylorRBGottfredsonSDBrowerSBlockS. Crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. J Res Crime Delinq. 1984;21:303–331.
39.
SkoganWG. Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral Decay in American Neighborhoods. New York, NY: MacMillan; 1990.
40.
PerkinsDDAbrahamARichardRTaylorRB. The physical environment of street crime. J Environ Psychol. 1993;13:29–49.
41.
LaGrangeRFerraroKSupancicM. Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities. J Res Crime Delinq. 1992;29:311–334.
42.
WilsonJQKellingGL. Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly. 1982;249(3):29–38.
43.
HarcourtBE. Illusion of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2001.
44.
TaylorR. Breaking Away from Broken Windows: Baltimore Neighborhoods and the Nationwide Fight Against Crime, Grime, Fear, and Decline. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 2001.
45.
DayK. Fear of crime and the physical environment. In: ZelinkaABrennanD. Safescape: Creating Safer, More Livable Communities Through Planning and Design. Washington, DC: American Planning Association Planners Press; 2001:7.
46.
WarrM. Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization. Soc Forces. 1990;68:891–907.
47.
AngelS. Discouraging Crime Through City Planning. Berkeley, Calif: Center for Planning and Development Research; 1968.
48.
BlockRDavisS. The environs of rapid transit stations: A focus for street crime or just another risky place? In: ClarkeD, ed. Preventing Mass Transit Crime. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1996:238–257.
49.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ. Nodes, paths, and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and physical environment. J Environ Psychol. 1993;13:3–28.
50.
PoynerB. Design Against Crime. London, UK: Butterworth; 1983.
51.
ByrneJ. Cities, citizens, and crime: The ecological/nonecological debate reconsidered. In: ByrneJSampsonRJ, eds. The Social Ecology of Crime. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1986:77–101.
52.
GreenbergS. Fear and its relationship to crime, neighborhood deterioration and informal social control. In: ByrneJSampsonRJ, eds. The Social Ecology of Crime. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1986:47–62.
53.
RoncekDWMaierPA. Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘hot spots.’Criminology. 1991;29:725–753.
54.
SpelmanW. Abandoned buildings: Magnets for crime. J Crim Just. 1993;21:481–495.
55.
BlockRLBlockCR. Space, place, and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. In: EckJWeisburdD, eds. Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press; 1995.
56.
Loukaitou-SiderisALiggettRIsekiH. Measuring the effects of built environment on bus stop crime. Environ Plann B. 2001;28:255–280.
57.
EckJEClarkeRVGueretteRT. Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. In: FarrellGBowersKJJohnsonSDTownsleyM, eds. Imagination for Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. In press.
58.
Loukaitou-SiderisA. Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. J Am Plann Assoc. 1999;65:395–411.
59.
Loukaitou-SiderisALiggettR. On bus stop crime. Access. 2000;16:27–33.
60.
CullenFTSundtJL. Reaffirming evidence-based corrections. Criminology and Public Policy. 2003;2:353–358.
61.
SpelmanW. The limited importance of prison expansion. In: BlumsteinAWallmanJ, eds. The Crime Drop in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000:97–129.
62.
WrightBRECaspiAMoffittTEPaternosterR. Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. J Res Crime Delinq. 2004;41:180–213.
63.
RuthHReitzKR. The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking Our Response. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2003.
64.
ClarkeRVWeisburdD. Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In: ClarkeRV, ed. Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1994:165–184.
65.
GoldsteinH. Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime Delinquency. 1979;25:236–258.
66.
ScottMS. Policing for prevention: Shifting and sharing the responsibility to address public safety problems. In: TilleyN, ed. Crime Prevention Handbook. Cullompton, Devon: Willan; 2005.
67.
GoldsteinH. Problem-Oriented Policing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1990.
68.
WeisburdDEckJE. What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear?Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2004;593(May):42–65.
69.
National Research Council.Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
70.
ClarkeRVEckJE. Crime Analysis for Problem Solvers: In 60 Small Steps. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing; 2005.
71.
CornishDBClarkeRV. Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley's critique of situation crime prevention. In: SmithMJCornishDB, eds. Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 2003:41–96.
72.
CohenLFelsonM. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev. 1979;44:588–605.
73.
FelsonM. Crime and Everyday Life. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2002.
74.
EckJE. Police problems: the complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation. In: KnutssonJ, ed. Problem-Oriented Policing: From Innovation to Mainstream. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 2003:67–102.
75.
FelsonM. Those who discourage crime. In: EckJEWeisburdD, eds. Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1995:53–66.
76.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ. Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In: ClarkeRVFelsonM, eds. Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 1993:259–294.
77.
RengertGF. The journey to crime. In: BruinsmaGElffersHKeijserJD, eds. Punishment, Places and Perpetrators: Developments in Criminology and Criminal Justice Research. Cullompton, Devon: Willan; 2004:169–181.
78.
ClarkeRV. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. 2nd ed.Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston; 1997.
79.
NewmanO. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. New York, NY: MacMillan; 1972.
80.
EckJE. Preventing crime at places. In: ShermanLWFarringtonDWelshBMacKenzieDL, eds. Evidence-Based Crime Prevention. New York, NY: Routledge; 2002:241–294.
81.
PoynerB. What works in crime prevention: An overview of evaluations. In: ClarkeRV, ed. Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1993:7–34.
82.
BragaAA. The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2001;578(November):104–125.
83.
ShermanLW. Police crackdowns: initial and residual deterrence. In: TonryMMorrisN, eds. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1990:1–48.
84.
WelshBCFarringtonDP. Surveillance for crime prevention in public space: Results and policy choices in Britain and America. Criminology and Public Policy. 2004;3:497–526.
85.
HesselingRBP. Displacement: A review of the empirical literature. In: ClarkeRV, ed. Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1994:197–230.
86.
WeisburdDWyckoffLAReadyJ. Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of displacement and diffusion in two crime hot spots. Criminology. In press.
87.
BrindenballBJesilowP. Weeding criminals or planting fear: The evaluation of a weed and seed project. Crim Justice Rev. 2005;30:64–89.
88.
TaftPBJ. Fighting Fear: The Baltimore County C.O.P.E. Project. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum; 1986.
89.
CordnerGW. Fear of crime and the police: An evaluation of a fear-reduction strategy. J Police Sci Admin. 1986;14:223–233.
90.
BattyM. Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005.