The current study compared two interventions for promotion of stair climbing in the workplace, an information-based intervention at a health information day and an environmental intervention (point-of-choice prompts), for their effectiveness in changing stair climbing and cost per employee.
Design.
Interrupted time-series design.
Setting.
Four buildings on a university campus.
Subjects.
Employees at a university in the United Kingdom.
Interventions.
Two stair-climbing interventions were compared: (1) a stand providing information on stair climbing at a health information day and (2) point-of-choice prompts (posters).
Measures.
Observers recorded employees' gender and method of ascent (n = 4279). The cost of the two interventions was calculated.
Analysis.
Logistic regression.
Results.
There was no significant difference between baseline (47.9% stair climbing) and the Workplace Wellbeing Day (48.8% stair climbing), whereas the prompts increased stair climbing (52.6% stair climbing). The health information day and point-of-choice prompts cost $773.96 and $31.38, respectively.
Conclusion.
The stand at the health information day was more expensive than the point-of-choice prompts and was inferior in promoting stair climbing. It is likely that the stand was unable to encourage stair climbing because only 3.2% of targeted employees visited the stand. In contrast, the point-of-choice prompts were potentially visible to all employees using the buildings and hence better for disseminating the stair climbing message to the target audience. (Am J Health Promot 2011;25[4]:231–236.)
DishmanRKOldenburgBO'NealHShephardRJ.Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med.1998;15:344–361.
2.
EngbersLHvan PoppelMNMPawMJMCAvan MechelenW.Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes—a systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2005;29:61–70.
3.
EvesFFWebbOJ.Worksite interventions to increase stair climbing; reasons for caution. Prev Med.2006;43:4–7.
4.
ZimringCJosephANicollGLTsepasS.Influences of building design and site design on physical activity—research and intervention opportunities. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:186–193.
5.
KennedyRABorehamCAMurphyMHEvaluating the effects of a low volume stairclimbing programme on measures of health-related fitness in sedentary office workers. J Sports Sci Med.2007;6:448–454.
6.
BorehamCAGKennedyRAMurphyMHTraining effects of short bouts of stair climbing on cardiorespiratory fitness, blood lipids, and homocysteine in sedentary young women. Br J Sports Med.2005;39:590–593.
7.
LeeIMPaffenbargerRSJr.Physical activity and stroke incidence: The Harvard Alumni Health Study. Stroke.1998;29:2049–2054.
8.
HaskellWLLeeIMPateTTPhysical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2007;39:1423–1434.
9.
ShenassaEDFryeMBraubachMDaskalakisC.Routine stair climbing in place of residence and body mass index: A pan-European population based study. Int J Obes.2008;32:490–494.
10.
KerrJEvesFCarrollD.Can posters prompt stair use in a worksite environment?J Occup Health.2001;43:205–207.
11.
KrugerJYoreMMBauerDRKohlHW.Selected barriers and incentives for worksite health promotion services and policies. Am J Health Promot.2007;21:439–447.
12.
EvesFFWebbOJMutrieN.A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: Greater effects in the overweight. Obesity.2006;14:2210–2216.
EvesFFMastersRSW.An uphill struggle: Effects of a point-of- choice stair climbing intervention in a non-English speaking population. Int J Epidemiol.2006;35:1286–1290.
15.
EvesFFMastersRSWMcManusAContextual barriers to lifestyle physical activity interventions in Hong Kong. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2008;40:965–971.
16.
EvesFFOlanderEKNicollGIncreasing stair climbing in a train station: Effects of contextual variables and visibility. J Environ Psychol.2009;29:300–303.
17.
AuweeleYVBoenFSchapendonkWDornezK.Promoting stair use among female employees: The effects of a health sign followed by an e-mail. J Sport Exerc Psychol.2005;27:188–196.
18.
BoutelleKNJefferyRWMurrayDMSchmitzMK.Using signs, artwork, and music to promote stair use in a public building. Am J Public Health.2001;91:2004–2006.
19.
BungumTMeachamMTruaxN.The effects of signage and the physical environment on stair usage. J Phys Act Health.2007;4:237–244.
20.
ColemanKJGonzalezEC.Promoting stair use in a US-Mexico border community. Am J Public Health.2001;91:2007–2009.
21.
EngbersLHvan PoppelMNvan MechlenW.Modest effects of a controlled worksite environmental intervention on cardiovascular risk in office workers. Prev Med.2007;44:356–362.
22.
KerrNAYoreMMHamSADietzWH.Increasing stair use in a worksite through environmental changes. Am J Health Promot.2004;18:312–315.
23.
KwakLKremersSPJVan BaakMABrugJ.A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue- and white-collar worksites. Prev Med.2007;45:177–181.
24.
MarshallALBaumanAEPatchCCan motivational signs prompt increases in incidental physical activity in an Australian health-care facility?Health Educ Res.2002;17:743–749.
25.
RussellWDDzewaltowskiDARyanGJ.The effectiveness of a point-of-decision prompt in deterring sedentary behavior. Am J Health Promot.1999;13:257–259.
26.
KwakLKremersSPvan BaakMABrugJ.Formation of implementation intentions promotes stair use. Am J Prev Med.2007;32:254–255.
27.
KnadlerGFRogersT.Mountain climb month: A low-cost exercise intervention program at a high-rise worksite. Fitness Business.1987;October:64–67.
28.
TehKCAzizAR.Heart rate, oxygen uptake, and energy cost of ascending and descending the stairs. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:695–699.
29.
KerrJEvesFCarrollD.Six-month observational study of prompted stair climbing. Prev Med.2001;33:422–427.
30.
WebbOJEvesFF.Promoting stair climbing: Intervention effects generalize to a subsequent stair ascent. Am J Health Promot.2007;22:114–119.
31.
BullFCAdamsEJHooperPL.Well@Work: Promoting Active and Healthy Workplaces Final Evaluation Report. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University: United Kingdom;2008.
32.
PegusCBazzarreTLBrownJSMenzinJ.Effect of the Heart at Work program on awareness of risk factors, self-efficacy, and health behaviors. J Occup Environ Med.2002;44:228–236.
33.
WenLMOrrNBindonJRisselC.Promoting active transport in a workplace setting: Evaluation of a pilot study in Australia. Health Promot Int.2005;20:123–133.
34.
NicollG.Spatial measures associated with stair use. Am J Health Promot.2007;21:346–352.
35.
OrbellSSheeranP. ‘Inclined Abstainers': a problem for predicting health-related behavior. Br J Soc Psychol.1998;37:151–165.
36.
LinnanLAEmmonsKMKlarNChallenges to improving the impact of worksite cancer prevention programs: Comparing reach, enrollment, and attrition using active versus passive recruitment strategies. Ann Behav Med.2002;24:157–166.
37.
HardenAPeersmanGOliverSA systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace. Occup Med.1999;49:540–548.
38.
SevickMADunnALMorrowMSCost-effectiveness of lifestyle and structured exercise interventions in sedentary adults: Results of project ACTIVE. Am J Prev Med.2000;19:1–8.
