Abstract
Thirteen participants with cervical SCI used a soft robotic glove in a variety of tests compared to their baseline function. Results included a 50% improvement on the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test from baseline to glove trial and significant increases in grasp and pinch forces with the active glove. The glove was controlled by the participants with an external button pushed by the nontested hand. In the future, this device could be portable and used in the home or community.
Primary Author and Speaker: Kristin Nuckols
Contributing Authors: Carolina Correia, Kate Zhou, Diana Wagner, Conor Walsh
Every year, over 17,000 Americans suffer a spinal cord injury (SCI) [1]. Cervical spinal injuries are the most frequent type of SCI. The loss of hand function is particularly devastating to these individuals, as it affects the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and leads to decreased life satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) [2]. As less than 1% of individuals with SCI regain premorbid mobility status, assistive devices that augment hand function are highly desirable.
Over the past fifteen years, robotic devices have emerged as an exciting prospect for augmenting and restoring movement to the limbs. Initially, rigid systems were developed but can be uncomfortable, must be strictly aligned with the biological structures, and tend to be large and stationary. Soft robotic devices are a promising response to the limitations of rigid systems as they are lightweight, non-restrictive to movement, and can be portable. A variety of soft robotic devices have been developed to assist and restore hand function [3] but only a few groups have formally investigated efficacy in targeted clinical populations. We previously tested the sensor-based controls of this glove in a small cohort of individuals with SCI [4]. This most recent study aims to increase the literature base by performing a clinical study of a self-controlled soft robotic glove to support ADL in the SCI population.
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2019). Facts and Figures at a Glance. University of Alabama at Birmingham. Birmingham, AL, USA.
Snoek, G, IJzerman, M, Hermens, H, Maxwell, D, & Biering-Sorensen, F. (2004). Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 42. 526–532. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638
Chu, C, & Patterson, R. (2018). Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: a narrative review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 15: 9. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6.
Zhou, Y, Wagner, D, Nuckols, K, Heimgartner, R, Correia, C, Clarke, M, Orzel, D, O’Neill, C, Solinsky, R, Paganoni, S, & Walsh, C. (2019). Soft Robotic Glove with Integrated Sensing for Intuitive Grasping Assistance Post Spinal Cord Injury. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal, Canada.
