Abstract
Occupational therapy practitioners have a role in opposing the harmful, discriminatory practice of conversion “therapy” and protecting LGBTQIA+ people. Occupational therapy practitioners should never participate in or promote the principles of conversion “therapy” practices as part of occupational therapy intervention.
AOTA’s new position statement affirms that occupational therapy has a role in opposing the harmful, discriminatory practice of conversion “therapy” practices to protect LGBTQIA+ people as part of occupational therapy intervention.
The American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) asserts that occupational therapy practitioners have a role in opposing the harmful, discriminatory practice of conversion “therapy” and protecting LGBTQIA+ people. 1 This assertion is congruent with the AOTA (2020a) Occupational Therapy Code of Ethics principles of Justice, Beneficence, and Nonmaleficence as well as the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework’s definition of Occupational Justice (AOTA, 2020b). Occupational therapy practitioners should never participate in or promote the principles of conversion “therapy” practices as part of occupational therapy intervention.
Conversion “therapy,” also referenced by names including reparative therapy, ex-gay ministry, sexuality counseling, and healing sexuality brokenness, refers to efforts aimed at changing an individual’s gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation in any way, with the intention of conformity toward heterosexual or cisgender 2 norms (American Medical Association [AMA], 2019; Higbee et al., 2022). Conversion “therapy” efforts expand among websites, books, youth camps, and other environments; however, most commonly they are performed by mental health professionals and religious and spiritual advisors (Human Rights Campaign & National Center for Lesbian Rights, n.d.). The strategies employed include talk therapy and aversion treatments such as electric shock, humiliation tactics aimed at instigating shame, and hypnosis to induce vomiting (Higbee et al., 2022). All of the aforementioned techniques lack scientific evidence and are not only ineffective but also deeply damaging and have been condemned by most major mental health and medical organizations in the United States for several decades (AMA, 2019; American Psychiatric Association, 2018; American Psychological Association, 2021; National Association of Social Workers, 2015).
The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the University of California, Los Angeles, published a brief in 2019 reporting that nearly 700,000 LGBT individuals had been subjected to conversion “therapy” in the United States, of whom approximately 350,000 reported being in their adolescence at the time of these traumatizing experiences (Mallory et al., 2019). Young people exposed to these efforts to change sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression reported increased rates of suicide attempts and higher incidents of severe depression and substance use, as well as anxiety, lower self-esteem, sexual dysfunction, and social challenges (AMA, 2019; Higbee et al., 2020; Mallory et al., 2019). At its core, conversion “therapy” pathologizes LGBTQIA+ people and violates their autonomy, furthering societal stigma against those who do not conform to socially constructed heterosexual and/or cisgender binaries.
Health Implications
As a traumatic experience, conversion “therapy” negatively impacts LGBTQIA+ people and populations across all ages, abilities, environments, and areas of occupation. These factors are compounded with the systemic oppression and intersectional discrimination faced by those with multiple minoritized identities (Neumann et al., 2021). The following are just brief examples of how occupational participation may be disrupted: Activities of daily living (ADLs): Routines surrounding ADLs may be disrupted secondary to symptoms of posttraumatic stress, depression, and shame from their experiences, leading to diminished participation in critical self-care activities such as sexual activity, bathing, and feeding (Bancroft, 1969; Beckstead & Morrow, 2004; Johnston & Jenkins, 2006). Social participation: Conversion “therapy” may lead to self-imposed isolation secondary to trauma and guilt; social stigma associated with being LGBTQIA+; and micro- and macro-aggressions, violence, and oppression. Negative experiences in social environments where the person’s very existence and identity are being invalidated may all decrease one’s socialization (www.beyondexgay.com; Flentje et al., 2014). Health management: Individuals who experienced conversion “therapy” are more likely than their LGBTQIA+ peers who have not undergone conversion “therapy” to experience increased suicidal ideation, attempt suicide, and engage in high-risk sexual behaviors (Beckstead & Morrow, 2004; Meanley et al., 2020; Ryan et al., 2020). In addition, individuals who have experienced trauma have increased rates of chronic health conditions, including, but not limited to, lung and heart disease, liver disease, viral hepatitis, liver cancer, and autoimmune diseases (Center for Health Care Strategies, 2017). Sleep and rest: Secondary symptoms experienced by conversion “therapy” participants, such as anxiety, depression, self-hate, and anger, may disrupt or alter physiological processes around sleep and rest (www.beyondexgay.com; Bancroft, 1969; Flentje et al., 2014; Johnston & Jenkins, 2006). Education: LGBTQIA+ individuals who underwent conversion “therapy” during adolescence experienced challenges in school and pursued fewer educational opportunities compared with their peers (www.beyondexgay.com; Ryan et al., 2020).
Ethical Responsibility
Although there is no evidence suggesting that occupational therapy practitioners engage in support of conversion “therapy,” all practitioners must be aware of the impact on a client who may have undergone conversion “therapy” to treat clients in a trauma-informed manner. Occupational therapy practitioners should directly address the physical and mental health impact and stressors that experiences related to conversion “therapy” may have had on occupational functioning and well-being. In addition, practitioners can collaborate with individuals, organizations, health care teams, and institutions as initiators of and contributors to advocacy efforts against conversion “therapy,” especially for minors, who are often subjected to these experiences against their will (Cordero & Carlisle, 2019). This may be especially relevant in the 22 states and 4 territories that, to date, do not have laws banning conversion “therapy” (Movement Advancement Project, n.d.). It is critical that occupational therapy practitioners consider the unique trauma experiences of LGBTQIA+ people and continuously engage in educational opportunities to increase knowledge about LGBTQIA+ health (American Occupational Therapy Association, 2021). This is necessary to prevent retraumatization and provide informed, nonjudgmental, and affirming care to all clients.
Resources
National Center for Lesbian Rights, “Born Perfect” (https://www.nclrights.org/our-work/born-perfect/) Family Acceptance Project (https://familyproject.sfsu.edu) “What Is Conversion Therapy?” (https://www.glaad.org/conversiontherapy?response_type=embed) “Gay Conversion Therapy: Hundreds of Religious Leaders Call for Ban” (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55326461) “Ending Conversion Therapy: Supporting and Affirming LGBTQ Youth” (https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/sma15-4928.pdf) “Ending Conversion Therapy to Save Young LGBTQ Lives” (Brinton, S. 2020) (https://www.nami.org/NAMI/ media/conventionresources/3C-Ending-Conversion- Therapy-to-Save-Young-LGBTQ-Lives.pdf) “Addressing LGBTQIA+ Trauma: Your Role and Your Responsibility” (Neumann et al., 2021)
Footnotes
1
LGBTQIA+ is an umbrella term that includes Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual individuals, with the + sign representing the ever-expansive terms used by individuals to reflect their identities. Not all individuals within sexual and gender minority groups identify with these terms.
2
Cisgender refers to an individual whose gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth.
