Sensory processing is a vital precursor for students to engage successfully in the school environment. Sensory activities, such as movement breaks, can be strategically scheduled into the school day by the educational team, including occupational therapy practitioners, to help students with self-regulation and academic demands.
Objective
To synthesize the evidence regarding the impact of sensory activity schedules on school performance and behavior of students who have documented sensory processing differences.
Data Sources
PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Embase, ProQuest Central, and Web of Science databases.
Results
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to search for and select articles. Nine articles were found that met inclusion criteria: two Level 2b studies and seven Level 4 studies. The studies examined how a sensory activity schedule affects a student’s school performance or behavior. The outcome measures were categorized as disruptive behavior, on-task behavior, cognitive strategy use, and task mastery. Although sensory activity schedules have the potential to benefit a student’s school performance or behavior, the current strength of evidence is low.
Conclusions and Relevance
Occupational therapy practitioners may advocate incorporating sensory activities into a student’s daily routine to improve school-related outcomes; however, with the current body of evidence, clinical reasoning and individualized progress monitoring are essential to track the intervention’s efficacy. Additional research is needed to build more substantial evidence to support occupational therapy practitioners’ use and promotion of sensory activity schedules with students.
Plain-Language Summary
Students need to regulate their senses to fully participate in school activities. This systematic review looked at research on whether sensory activity schedules improve students’ school performance and classroom behavior. Although sensory activity schedules may help students, the current research is limited. Occupational therapy practitioners can still recommend scheduled sensory activities but should carefully track each student’s progress to see if the approach works. More high-quality research is needed to better understand the benefits of school sensory activity schedules.
This systematic review looked at research on whether sensory activity schedules improve students’ school performance and classroom behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2017). Guidelines for occupational therapy services in early intervention and schools. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 7112410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.716S01
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020b). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2023c). Sensory integration approaches for children and youth in occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 7713410230. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.77s3004
7.
AndelinL.ReynoldsS., & SchoenS. (2021). Effectiveness of occupational therapy using a sensory integration approach: A multiple baseline design study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 7506205030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2021.044917
8.
AshburnerJ. K.ZivianiJ. M., & RodgerS. A. (2008). Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 564–573. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.5.564
9.
BattinV.PanzoneJ.FishM.LorthioirN.OdiernaJ.DowA., … EberleyM. (2020). Effectiveness of occupational therapy sensory interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7411520500. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S1-PO9129
10.
*BensonJ. D.BlaskowitzM. G.CollinsA.SmitskyD.ChippichE., & ConnellC. (2022). The effect of a sensory activity schedule (SAS) on the on-task behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 15, 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.2003734
11.
BensonJ. D.BreisingerE., & RoachM. (2019). Sensory-based intervention in the schools: A survey of occupational therapy practitioners. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 12, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1496872
12.
BoltonT., & PlattnerL. (2020). Occupational therapy role in school-based practice: Perspectives from teachers and OTs. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 13, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2019.1636749
13.
BonggatP. W., & HallL. J. (2010). Evaluation of the effects of sensory integration-based intervention by a preschool special education teacher. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 294–302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879813
14.
CahillS. M., & BazykS. (2020). School-based occupational therapy. In O’BrienJ. C. & KuhaneckH. (Eds.), Case-Smith’s occupational therapy for children and adolescents (8th ed., pp. 627–658). Elsevier.
15.
CaughyM. O.MillsB.BrinkleyD., & OwenM. T. (2018). Behavioral self-regulation, early academic achievement, and the effectiveness of urban schools for low-income ethnic minority children. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61, 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12242
16.
ChapparoC., & RankaJ. (2011). The PRPP system of task analysis: User’s training manual—research edition.University of Sydney.
17.
CharlesR., & GlennonT. (2020). Understanding how school-based OT practitioners (OTPs) perceive sensory integrative and sensory-based interventions: Knowledge base and practical application. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7411505260. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S1-PO9800
18.
CrastaJ. E.SalzingerE.LinM.GavinW. J., & DaviesP. L. (2020). Sensory processing and attention profiles among children with sensory processing disorders and autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 14, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2020.00022
19.
Frolek ClarkG.RiouxJ., & ChandlerB. (2019). Best practices for occupational therapy in schools (2nd ed.). AOTA Press.
20.
GillP., & RemediosR. (2013). How should researchers in education operationalise on-task behaviours?Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.767878
21.
GrajoL. C.CandlerC., & SarafianA. (2020). Interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve children’s academic participation: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7402180030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.039016
22.
HigginsJ. P. T.SterneJ. A. C.SavovićJ.PageM. J.HróbjartssonA.BoutronI., … EldridgeS. (2016). A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. In J. Chandler, J. McKenzie, I. Boutron, & V. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane methods. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD201601
23.
HintzL. A.FletcherT.CahillS., & PoskeyG. (2023). Teachers’ experiences with occupational therapy multi-tiered systems support: A qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 16, 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2112361
24.
HollowayK.HowardC.CollinM., & PillosP. (2025). Impact of sensory diets on occupational performance [Graduate Capstone Project, Dominican University of California]. Dominican Scholar, 72. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2025.OT.01
25.
JonesE. K.HanleyM., & RibyD. M. (2020). Distraction, distress and diversity: Exploring the impact of sensory processing differences on learning and school life for pupils with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 72, 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101515
26.
JussilaK.JunttilaM.KielinenM.EbelingH.JoskittL.MoilanenI., & MattilaM. (2020). Sensory abnormality and quantitative autism traits in children with and without autism spectrum disorder in an epidemiological population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04237-0
27.
Mac CobbS.FitzgeraldB.Lanigan-O’KeeffeC.IrwinN., & MellerickN. (2014). Students with social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties: The Alert Program trial in post-primary schools. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 7, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2014.930606
28.
MalloryC., & KeehnB. (2021). Implications of sensory processing and attentional differences associated with autism in academic settings: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 695825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695825
*Mere-CookY. (2016). Implementation and strategies to address sensory regulation of students with and without disabilities in two kindergarten classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco]. Scholarship Repository. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/315/
31.
Miller KuhaneckH., & KelleherJ. (2018). The classroom sensory environment assessment as an educational tool for teachers. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 11, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1432442
32.
*MillsC., & ChapparoC. (2017). Use of perceive, recall, plan, perform stage two cognitive task analysis for students with autism and intellectual disability: The impact of a sensory activity schedule. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 10, 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2017.1335262
33.
*MillsC.ChapparoC., & HinittJ. (2016). The impact of an in-class sensory activity schedule on task performance of children with autism and intellectual disability: A pilot study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616639989
34.
*MillsC. J.ChapparoC., & HinittJ. (2020). The impact of sensory activity schedule (SAS) intervention on classroom task performance in students with autism: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Advances in Autism, 6, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-05-2019-0015
35.
*MillsC.ChapparoC., & HinittJ. (2021). Impact of a sensory activity schedule intervention on cognitive strategy use in autistic students: A school-based pilot study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84, 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022620982888
36.
MoraL., & ChapparoC. (2011). Using a sensory diet to mediate behaviours of concern and to increase children’s participation in daily activities. In DossetorD.WhiteD., & WhatsonL. (Eds.), Mental health of children and adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A framework for professional practice (pp. 135–151). IP Communications.
37.
MortimoreP.DaviesJ.VarlaamA.WestA.DevineP., & MazzaJ. (1983). Behaviour problems in schools: An evaluation of support centres(1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351028547
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D., … MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
41.
ParhamL. D., & MaillouxZ. (2020). Sensory integration. In O’BrienJ. C. & KuhaneckH. (Eds.), Case-Smith’s occupational therapy for children and adolescents (8th ed., pp. 516–549). Elsevier.
42.
ParhamL. D.RoleyS. S.May-BensonT. A.KoomarJ.Brett-GreenB.BurkeJ. P., … SchaafR. C. (2011). Development of a fidelity measure for research on the effectiveness of the Ayres sensory integration intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000745
43.
*PingaleV.FletcherT., & CandlerC. (2019). The effects of sensory diets on children’s classroom behaviors. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 12, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2019.1592054
44.
*PingaleV.FletcherT. S.CandlerC.PickensN., & DunlapK. (2022). Effects of sensory diets: A single subject study. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 15, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1941492
45.
RobergeN., & CrastaJ. E. (2022). A systematic review of sensory interventions for children with autism: The effects on attention and self-regulation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 7610510189. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.76S1-PO189
46.
*SmithL. (2019). Effects of a sensory diet on attention and participation in children with autism(Publication No. 29393409) [Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University]. NSU Florida Theses and Dissertations. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_etd/374
47.
SmithM. N., & DouglasR. R. (2024). The role of school-based occupational therapy practitioners in providing Tier 1 services to enhance sensory processing and self-regulation strategies within the classroom. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 17, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2129904
48.
TufanaruC.MunnZ.AromatarisE.CampbellJ., & HoppL. (2020). Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In AromatarisE.LockwoodC.PorrittK.PillaB., & JordanZ. (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis.JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-03
WagnerB.LatimerJ.AdamsE.Carmichael OlsonH.SymonsM.MazzucchelliT. G., … FitzpatrickJ. P. (2020). School-based intervention to address self-regulation and executive functioning in children attending primary schools in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. PLoS ONE, 15, e0234895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234895
51.
WangM.DegolJ.AmemiyaJ.ParrA., & GuoJ. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912
52.
WattH. M.CoxG.DeHerreraM.PodgornyS.FortunaJ., & Cantwell-JurkovicL. (2024). Sensory-based interventions in school-based occupational therapy: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 17, 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2023.2275562
53.
WhitingC. C.SchoenS. A.BundyA.LaneS. J.MaillouxZ.RoleyS. S., … SchaafR. C. (2025). Occupational therapy using Ayres Sensory Integration® in school-based practice: A call to action. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 7901347020. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050971
54.
WilbargerJ., & WilbargerP. (2020). Complementary programs for intervention: Section 1: The Wilbarger approach to treating sensory defensiveness. In BundyA. C. & LaneS. L. (Eds.), Sensory integration theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 426–438). F. A. Davis.
55.
WilbargerP. (1984). Planning an adequate “sensory diet”: Application of sensory processing theory during the first year of life. Zero to Three, 5, 7–12.
56.
WildG., & SteeleyS. L. (2018). A model for classroom-based intervention for children with sensory processing differences. International Journal of Special Education, 33, 745–765. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1196698.pdf
