Biomaterial-associated infections have an enormous impact in terms of morbidity of the patients and costs to national health systems. Perioperative antibiotics and aseptic procedures have not proved sufficient to eradicate the occurrence of this type of infections which often lead to devastating effects. Adjunctive strategies for preventing the establishment of infections are increasingly being centered on the development of new biomaterials with anti-infective properties. The creation of new anti-infective biomaterials can be obtained by alternative approaches oriented to achieve either bacteria-repellent surfaces or bioactive surfaces expressing self-sterilizing properties when not even able to treat preexisting infections in the surrounding tissues. Here, we offer a short overview of the currently available in vitro methods that can be used to investigate and assess the performance of anti-infective biomaterials, with special emphasis on those whose mechanism of action is based on bacteria-repellent surfaces.
CampocciaD., MontanaroL., ArciolaC.R.The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials.2006; 27(11): 2331–2339.
2.
CirioniO., GhiselliR., MinardiD.. RNAIII-inhibiting peptide affects biofilm formation in a rat model of staphylococcal ureteral stent infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2007; 51(12): 4518–4520.
3.
CostertonJ.W., Lappin–ScottH.M.Behavior of bacteria in biofilm. ASM News.1989; 55: 650–654.
4.
ArciolaC.R., CampocciaD., SpezialeP., MontanaroL., CostertonJ.W.Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials.2012; 33(26): 5967–5982.
5.
ArciolaC.R., BaldassarriL., CampocciaD.. Strong biofilm production, antibiotic multi-resistance and high gelE expression in epidemic clones of Enterococcus faecalis from orthopaedic implant infections. Biomaterials.2008; 29(5): 580–586.
6.
von EiffC., ArciolaC.R., MontanaroL., BeckerK., CampocciaD.Emerging Staphylococcus species as new pathogens in implant infections. Int J Artif Organs.2006; 29(4): 360–367.
7.
ArciolaC.R., AnY.H., CampocciaD., DonatiM.E., MontanaroL.Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates. Int J Artif Organs.2005; 28(11): 1091–1100.
8.
MontanaroL., SpezialeP., CampocciaD.. Scenery of Staphylococcus implant infections in orthopedics. Future Microbiol.2011; 6(11): 1329–1349.
9.
AnY.H., FriedmanR.J.Laboratory methods for studies of bacterial adhesion. J Microbiol Methods.1997; 30: 141–152.
10.
KatsikogianniM., MissirlisY.F.Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cell Mater.2004; 8: 37–57.
11.
GottenbosB., van der MeiH.C., BusscherH.J.Initial adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biomedical polymers. J Biomed Mater Res.2000; 50(2): 208–214.
12.
RijnaartsH.H.M., NordeW., BouwerE.J., LyklemaJ., ZehnderJ.B.Reversibility and mechanism of bacterial adhesion. Coll Surf B Biointer.1995; 4(1): 5–22.
13.
O'GaraJ.P., HumphreysH.Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications. J Med Microbiol.2001; 50(7): 582–587.
14.
GötzF.Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol.2002; 43(6): 1367–1378.
15.
BarthE., MyrvikQ.M., WagnerW., GristinaA.G.In vitro and in vivo comparative colonization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on orthopaedic implant materials. Biomaterials.1989; 10(5): 325–328.
16.
OgaM., SugiokaY., HobgoodC.D., GristinaA.G., MyrvikQ.N.Surgical biomaterials and differential colonization by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biomaterials.1988; 9(3): 285–289.
17.
HogtA.H., DankertJ., FeijenJ.Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus to a hydrophobic biomaterial. J Gen Microbiol.1985; 131(9): 2485–2491.
18.
ReynoldsE.C., WongA.Effect of adsorbed protein on hydroxyapatite zeta potential and Streptococcus mutans adherence. Infect Immun.1983; 39(3): 1285–1290.
19.
PringleJ.H., FletcherM.Influence of substratum hydration and adsorbed macromolecules on bacterial attachment to surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol.1986; 51(6): 1321–1325.
20.
LocciR., PetersG., PulvererG.Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices. I. Microtopographical characteristics of intravenous catheters as detected by scanning electron microscopy. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B.1981; 173(5): 285–292.
21.
AnY.H., FriedmanR.J., DraughnR.A., SmithE.A., NicholsonJ., JohnJ.F.Rapid quantification of staphylococci adhered to titanium surfaces using image analyzed epifluorescence microscopy. J Microbiol Methods.1995; 24(1): 29–40.
22.
GristinaA.G., HobgoodC.D., BarthE.Biomaterial specificity, molecular mechanisms, and clinical relevance of S. epidermidis and S. aureus infections in surgery. In: PulvererG., QuieP.G., PetersG., eds. Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Stuttgart: Fisher Verlag; 1987: 143–157.
23.
GristinaA.G.Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science.1987; 237(4822): 1588–1595.
24.
van LoosdrechtM.C., LyklemaJ., NordeW., SchraaG., ZehnderA.J.B.The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol.1987; 53(8): 1893–1897.
25.
UeshimaM., TanakaS., NakamuraS., YamashitaK.Manipulation of bacterial adhesion and proliferation by surface charges of electrically polarized hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res.2002; 60(4): 578–84.
MorisakiH., NagaiS., OhshimaH., IkemotoE., KogureK.The effect of motility and cell-surface polymers on bacterial attachment. Microbiology.1999; 145(Pt 10): 2797–2802.
28.
MiörnerH., MyhreE., BjörckL., KronvallG.Effect of specific binding of human albumin, fibrinogen, and immunoglobulin G on surface characteristics of bacterial strains as revealed by partition experiments in polymer phase systems. Infect Immun.1980; 29(3): 879–885.
29.
FletcherM., MarshallK.C.Bubble contact angle method for evaluating substratum interfacial characteristics and its relevance to bacterial attachment. Appl Environ Microbiol.1982; 44(1): 184–192.
30.
DerjaguinB.V., LandauL.D.Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Prog Surf Sci.1993; 43(1-4): 30–59.
31.
van OssC.J.Interaction forces between biological and other polar entities in water: how many different forces are there?J Disp Sci Technol.1991; 12(2): 201–220.
32.
van OssC.J.Long-range and short-range mechanisms of hydrophobic attraction and hydrophilic repulsion in specific and aspecific interactions. J Mol Recognit.2003; 16(4): 177–190.
33.
NguyenV.T., ChiaT.W., TurnerM.S., FeganN., DykesG.A.Quantification of acid-base interactions based on contact angle measurement allows XDLVO predictions to attachment of Campylobacter jejuni but not Salmonella. J Microbiol Methods.2011; 86(1): 89–96.
34.
KatsikogianniM.G., MissirlisY.F.Interactions of bacteria with specific biomaterial surface chemistries under flow conditions. Acta Biomater.2010; 6(3): 1107–1118.
35.
MontanaroL., SpezialeP., CampocciaD.. Polymorphisms of agr locus correspond to distinct genetic patterns of virulence in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from orthopedic implant infections. J Biomed Mater Res A.2010; 94(3): 825–832.
36.
PattiJ.M., AllenB.L., McGavinM.J., HöökM.MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol.1994; 48: 585–617.
37.
SpezialeP., PietrocolaG., RindiS.. Structural and functional role of Staphylococcus aureus surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules of the host. Future Microbiol.2009; 4(10): 1337–1352.
38.
CampocciaD., SpezialeP., RavaioliS.. The presence of both bone sialoprotein-binding protein gene and collagen adhesion gene as a typical virulence trait of the major epidemic cluster in isolates from orthopedic implant infections. Biomaterials.2009; 30(34): 6621–6628.
39.
MaH., DickinsonR.B.Kinetic analysis of the attachment of a biological particle to a surface by macromolecular binding. J Theor Biol.2004; 226(2): 237–250.
40.
ScheuermanT.R., CamperA.K., HamiltonM.A.Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci.1998; 208(1): 23–33.
41.
BakerA.S., GreenhamL.W.Release of gentamicin from acrylic bone cement: elution and diffusion studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1988; 70(10): 1551–1557.
42.
MerrittK., ShaferJ.W., BrownS.A.Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials. J Biomed Mater Res.1979; 13(1): 101–108.
43.
BuntC.R., JonesD.S., TuckerI.G.The effects of pH, ionic strength and polyvalent ions on the cell surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli evaluated by the BATH and HIC methods. Int J Pharm.1995; 113(2): 257–261.
44.
AbbottA., RutterP.R., BerkeleyR.C.The influence of ionic strength, pH and a protein layer on the interaction between Streptococcus mutans and glass surfaces. J Gen Microbiol.1983; 129(2): 439–445.
45.
StoodleyP., LewandowskiZ., BoyleJ.D., Lappin-ScottH.M.Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotechnol Bioeng.1999; 65(1): 83–92.
46.
KlapperI., RuppC.J., CargoR., PurvedorjB., StoodleyP.Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties. Biotechnol Bioeng.2002; 80(3): 289–296.
47.
DickinsonR.B., CooperS.L.Analysis of shear dependent bacterial adhesion kinetics to biomaterial surfaces. AIchE J.1995; 41(9): 2160–2174.
48.
IsbergR.R., BarnesP.Dancing with the host; flow-dependent bacterial adhesion. Cell.2002; 110(1): 1–4.
49.
SchierholzJ.M., BeuthJ.Implant infections: a haven for opportunistic bacteria. J Hosp Infect.2001; 49(2): 87–93.
50.
DunneW.M.Jr.. Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of vancomycin or cefamandole on biofilm production by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1990; 34(3): 390–393.
51.
KnoblochJ.K., BartschtK., SabottkeA., RohdeH., FeuchtH.H., MackD.Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis depends on functional RsbU, an activator of the sigB operon: differential activation mechanisms due to ethanol and salt stress. J Bacteriol.2001; 183(8): 2624–2633.
52.
CampocciaD., MontanaroL., SpezialeP., ArciolaC.R.Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials and the risks for the spread of antibiotic resistance following their prophylactic and therapeutic clinical use. Biomaterials.2010; 31(25): 6363–6377.
53.
CampocciaD., MontanaroL., MoriartyT.F., RichardsR.G., RavaioliS., ArciolaC.R.The selection of appropriate bacterial strains in preclinical evaluation of infection-resistant biomaterials. Int J Artif Organs.2008; 31(9): 841–847.
54.
NejadnikM.R., van der MeiH.C., NordeW., BusscherH.J.Bacterial adhesion and growth on a polymer brush-coating. Biomaterials.2008; 29(30): 4117–4121.
55.
CampocciaD., SpezialeP., AnY.H.. Innovative methods of rapid bacterial quantification and applicability in diagnostics and in implant materials assessment. Int J Artif Organs.2007; 30(9): 842–851.
56.
CampocciaD., MontanaroL., AgheliH.. Study of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on a novel nanostructured surface by chemiluminometry. Int J Artif Organs.2006; 29(6): 622–629.
57.
DunneW.M.Jr., BurdE.M.In vitro measurement of the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to plastic by using cellular urease as a marker. Appl Environ Microbiol.1991; 57(3): 863–866.
58.
BochnerB.R., SavageauM.A.Generalized indicator plate for genetic, metabolic, and taxonomic studies with microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol.1977; 33(2): 434–444.
HarberM.J., MackenzieR., AsscherA.W.A rapid bioluminescence method for quantifying bacterial adhesion to polystyrene. J Gen Microbiol.1983; 129(3): 621–32.
61.
DuarteM., GiordaniR.B., De CarliG.A., ZuanazziJ.A., MacedoA.J., TascaT.A quantitative resazurin assay to determinate the viability of Trichomonas vaginalis and the cytotoxicity of organic solvents and surfactant agents. Exp Parasitol.2009; 123(2): 195–198.
62.
AuschillT.M., ArweilerN.B., NetuschilL., BrecxM., ReichE., SculeanA.Spatial distribution of vital and dead microorganisms in dental biofilms. Arch Oral Biol.2001; 46(5): 471–476.
63.
KuehnM., MehlM., HausnerM., BungartzH.J., WuertzS.Time-resolved study of biofilm architecture and transport processes using experimental and simulation techniques: the role of EPS. Water Sci Technol.2001; 43(6): 143–150.
64.
SubbiahdossG., KuijerR., GrijpmaD.W., van der MeiH.C., BusscherH.J.Microbial biofilm growth vs. tissue integration: “the race for the surface” experimentally studied. Acta Biomater.2009; 5(5): 1399–1404.
65.
ArciolaC.R., MontanaroL., CostertonJ.W.New trends in diagnosis and control strategies for implant infections. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 727–736.
66.
BerneyM., HammesF., BosshardF., WeilenmannH.U., EgliT.Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol.2007; 73(10): 3283–3290.
67.
SchauleG., FlemmingH.C., RidgwayH.F.Use of 5-cyano-2, 3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride for quantifying planktonic and sessile respiring bacteria in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol.1993; 59(11): 3850–3857.
68.
RodriguezG.G., PhippsD., IshiguroK., RidgwayH.F.Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol.1992; 58(6): 1801–1808.
69.
HoefelD., GroobyW.L., MonisP.T., AndrewsS., SaintC.P.A comparative study of carboxyfluorescein diacetate and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester as indicators of bacterial activity. J Microbiol Methods.2003; 52(3): 379–388.
70.
ThomasV.C., HiromasaY., HarmsN., ThurlowL., TomichJ., HancockL.E.A fratricidal mechanism is responsible for eDNA release and contributes to biofilm development of Enterococcus faecalis. Mol Microbiol.2009; 72(4): 1022–1036.
71.
RavaioliS., CampocciaD., VisaiL.. Biofilm extracellular-DNA in 55 Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from implant infections. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 840–846.
72.
FrankK.L., PatelR.Poly-N-acetylglucosamine is not a major component of the extracellular matrix in biofilms formed by icaADBC-positive Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates. Infect Immun.2007; 75(10): 4728–4742.
73.
CampocciaD., MontanaroL., RavaioliS., PiriniV., CanginiI., ArciolaC.R.Exopolysaccharide production by Staphylococcus epidermidis and its relationship with biofilm extracellular DNA. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 832–839.
74.
StrathmannM., WingenderJ., FlemmingH.C.Application of fluorescently labelled lectins for the visualization and biochemical characterization of polysaccharides in biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Microbiol Methods.2002; 50(3): 237–248.
75.
ClarkeS.R., HarrisL.G., RichardsR.G., FosterS.J.Analysis of Ebh, a 1.1-megadalton cell wall-associated fibronectin-binding protein of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun.2002; 70(12): 6680–6687.
76.
RazatosA.Application of atomic force microscopy to study initial events of bacterial adhesion. Methods Enzymol.2001; 337: 276–285.
77.
BustanjiY., ArciolaC.R., ContiM., MandelloE., MontanaroL., SamoríB.Dynamics of the interaction between a fibronectin molecule and a living bacterium under mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.2003; 100(23): 13292–13297.
78.
ArciolaC.R., MontanaroL., CaramazzaR., SassoliV., CavedagnaD.Inhibition of bacterial adherence to a high-water-content polymer by a water-soluble, nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug. J Biomed Mater Res.1998; 42(1): 1–5.
79.
WagnerC., AytacS., HänschG.M.Biofilm growth on implants: bacteria prefer plasma coats. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 811–817.
80.
Van PettK., SchurmanD.J., SmithR.L.Quantitation and relative distribution of extracellular matrix in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. J Orthop Res.1990; 8(3): 321–327.
NejadnikM.R., EngelsmanA.F., Saldarriaga FernandezI.C., BusscherH.J., NordeW., van der MeiH.C.Bacterial colonization of polymer brush-coated and pristine silicone rubber implanted in infected pockets in mice. J Antimicrob Chemother.2008; 62(6): 1323–1325.
83.
HookA.L., ChangC.Y., YangJ.. Polymer microarrays for high throughput discovery of biomaterials. J Vis Exp.2012; (59): e3636.
84.
HallR.E., BenderG., MarquisR.E.Inhibitory and cidal antimicrobial actions of electrically generated silver ions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1987; 45(9): 779–784.
85.
IpM., LuiS.L., PoonV.K., LungI., BurdA.Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. J Med Microbiol.2006; 55(Pt 1): 59–63.
86.
Gallant-BehmC.L., YinH.Q., LiuS.. Comparison of in vitro disc diffusion and time kill-kinetic assays for the evaluation of antimicrobial wound dressing efficacy. Wound Repair Regen.2005; 13(4): 412–421.
87.
FitzgeraldR.H.Jr.. Infections of hip prostheses and artificial joints. Infect Dis Clin North Am.1989; 3(2): 329–338.
88.
SugarmanB., YoungE.J.Infections associated with prosthetic devices: magnitude of the problem. Infect Dis Clin North Am.1989; 3(2): 187–198.
89.
ArciolaC.R., BaldassarriL., MontanaroL.In catheter infections by Staphylococcus epidermidis the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is a molecular marker of the virulent slime-producing strains. J Biomed Mater Res.2002; 59(3): 557–562.
90.
ArciolaC.R., CampocciaD., GamberiniS.. Search for the insertion element IS256 within the ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates collected from biomaterial-associated infections. Biomaterials.2004; 25(18): 4117–4125.
91.
MontanaroL., PoggiA., VisaiL.. Extracellular DNA in biofilms. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 824–31.
92.
ArciolaC.R., VisaiL., TestoniF.. Concise survey of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors that promote adhesion and damage to peri-implant tissues. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 771–80.
93.
MontanaroL., TestoniF., PoggiA., VisaiL., SpezialeP., ArciolaC.R.Emerging pathogenetic mechanisms of the implant-related osteomyelitis by Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Artif Organs.2011; 34(9): 781–8.
