This article is based on a series of papers by the author published in the Bulletin of the International Union of Soil Sciences; copies of the papers can be obtained from the author (Hartemink@isric.nl) or downloaded from www.soils.org.uk/porp/iuss-porp.htm.
2.
BurnhamJ.C., ‘How journal editors came to develop and critique peer review procedures’, in MaylanH.F. and SojkaR.E., eds, Research Ethics, Manuscript Review, and Journal Quality, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, 1992, pp 55–62.
3.
KealeyT., ‘More is less — economists and government lag decades behind Derek Price's thinking’, Nature, Vol 405, No 6784, 2000, p 279.
4.
BourkeR.M., ‘Inventory of unpublished agricultural research in Papua New Guinea’, Australian National University, Canberra, 1999.
5.
SatchellJ., ‘Take the money — call the tune’, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Vol 24, 1992, pp 1193–1196.
6.
FranckG., ‘Scientific communication — a vanity fair?’Science, Vol 286, No 5437, 1999, p 53+.
7.
HawkinsB.A., ‘More haste, less science?’Nature, Vol 400, 1999, p 498.
8.
GeertsB., ‘Trends in atmospheric science journals: A reader's perspective’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol 80, 1999, pp 639–650.
GueninL.M., ‘Expressing a consensus on candour’, Nature, Vol 402, No 6762, 1999, pp 577–578.
12.
BerryC.M., ‘A rum affair: How botany's “Piltdown man” was unmasked, by K. Sabbagh’, Nature, Vol 401, No 6755, 1999, pp 742–743.
13.
FinnJ.T., ‘Ethics training more important than ever’, Nature, Vol 401, No 6750, 1999, p 208; ReesD., ‘Putting transparency into ethical balance’, Nature, Vol 401, No 6754, 1999, p 641.
14.
ButlerD., ‘Is your journal really necessary? Science may best prosper if print journals are replaced by online communities’, Nature, Vol 407, No 6802, 2000, p 291.
15.
Kealey, op cit, Ref 3.
16.
GersteinM., ‘Forging links in an electronic paper chain’, Nature, Vol 398, No 6722, 1999, p 20.
