A comparison of Malay films produced in the 1950s in the Chinese-owned, Singapore-based Malay film industry with those produced in the Kuala Lumpur-based, government-supported Malayan Film Unit (MFU) exposes many similarities in how Malays were represented on film in the lead-up to Malayan independence in 1957. While the social realist films produced in Singapore urged ordinary Malays to accept changes that were occurring in society and the films produced by the MFU reinforced government propaganda and helped develop new heroes for the nation, both traditions portrayed Malays as being very comfortable and prosperous in an idyllic rural environment.
Anonymous (1953), Films of Malaya: Catalogue of Films Made by Malayan Film Unit, Department of Information, Kuala Lumpur.
2.
RajadhyakshaAshishWillemenPaul (1999), Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema, Fitzroy Dearborn, Chicago, IL.
3.
PawiAwang Azman AwangLianKhor Chooi (2005), P. Ramlee di CakeraNusantara [P. Ramlee in Archipelagic Viewpoints], Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan.
4.
BakerJim (2005), Cross-Roads: A Popular History of Malaysia and Singapore, Marshall Cavendish, Singapore.
5.
BarnardTimothy P. (2005), ‘“Not just a movie”: The historical context of P. Ramlee and his films’, in PawiAwang Azman AwangLianKhor Chooi, eds, P. Ramlee di Cakera Nusantara [P. Ramlee in Archipelagic Viewpoints], Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, pp 185–195.
6.
BarnardTimothy P. (2006), ‘P Ramlee, Malay cinema and history’, in ChouCynthiaHoubenVincent, eds, Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions, ISEAS Publications, Singapore, pp 162–179.
7.
BarnardTimothy P.van der PuttenJan (2008), ‘Malay cosmopolitan activism in post-war Singapore’, in BarrMichaelTrockiCarl, eds, Paths Not Taken: Political Pluralism in Post-War Singapore, NUS Press, Singapore, pp 132–153.
8.
CampbellJoseph (1968 [orig 1949]), The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 2 ed, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
GittingsChristopher E. (2002), Canadian National Cinema: Ideology, Difference and Representation, Routledge, London.
11.
HussinHamzah (1998), Memoir Hamzah Hussin: Dari Cathay Keris ke Studio Merdeka [The Memoir of Hamzah Hussin: From Cathay Keris to Studio Merdeka], Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan, Bangi.
12.
MuthalibHassanCheongWong Tuck (2002), Being and Becoming: The Cinemas of Asia, Macmillan India, New Delhi.
13.
MillerToby (2000), ‘Introduction to Part VII: The historical spectator/audience’, in StamRobertMillerToby, eds, Film and Theory: An Anthology, Blackwell, Oxford.
14.
PrasadM. Madhava (1998), Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
15.
ShamsulA. B. (2004), ‘A history of an identity, an identity of a history: The idea and practice of “Malayness” in Malaysia reconsidered’, in BarnardTimothy P., ed, Contesting Malayness: Malay Identity Across Boundaries, Singapore University Press, Singapore, pp 135–148.
16.
SmithMurray (1996), ‘The logic and legacy of Brechtianism’, in BordwellDavidCarrollNoel, eds, Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 130–147.
17.
VoglerChristopher (2007), The Writer's Journey: Mythic Structure For Writers, 3 ed, Michael Weise Productions, Studio City, CA.
18.
VoytillaStuart (1999), Myth and the Movies: Discovering the Myth Structure of Fifty Unforgettable Films, Michael Weise Productions, Studio City, CA.
19.
DissanayakeWimal (1994), Colonialism and Nationalism in Asian Cinema, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
