Renewable fuel standards, low carbon fuel standards, and ethanol subsidies are popular policies to incentivize ethanol production and reduce emissions from transportation. Compared to carbon trading, these policies lead to large shifts in agricultural activity and unexpected social costs. We simulate the 2022 Federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and find that energy crop production increases by 39 million acres. Land-use costs from erosion and habitat loss are between $277 and $693 million. A low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) and ethanol subsidies have similar effects while costs under an equivalent cap and trade (CAT) system are essentially zero. In addition, the alternatives to CAT magnify errors in assigning emissions rates to fuels and can over or under-incentivize innovation. These results highlight the potential negative effects of the RFS, LCFS and subsidies, effects that would be less severe under a CAT policy.
AdenA.RuthM.IbsenK.JechuraJ.NeevesK.SheehanJ.WallaceB.MontagueL.SlaytonA. (2002). “Lig-nocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover.” Technical Report NREL/TP-510-32438, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
2.
BarrowGeoffreyHochmanGalZilbermanDavid (2012). “Petroleum refining and the indirect byproduct effect of biofuels.” In 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington, number 124698. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
3.
BentoAntonio M.KlotzRichardLandryJoel (2012). “Are There Carbon Savings from U.S. Biofuel Policies? The Critical Importance of Accounting for Leakage in Land and Fuel Markets.” Working paper, Cornell University.
4.
ButzenS.HobbsT. (2002). “Corn processing III. Wet milling.” Crop Insights, 12:1-6.
5.
California Air Resources Board (2009). “Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Volume I.” Technical report.
6.
ChakravortyUjjayantHubertMarie-HeleneMoreauxMichelNistbakkenLinda (2013). “The Long Run Impact of Biofuels on Food Prices.” Working Paper 3876, CESifo Group Munich.
7.
ChenXiaoguangHuangHaixiaoKhannaMadhuOnalHayri (2011). “Meeting the Mandate for Biofuels: Implications for Land Use, Food and Fuel Prices.” Working Paper 16697, National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
CuiJingboLapanHarveyMoschiniGianCarloCooperJoseph (2011). “Welfare Impacts of Alternative Biofuel and Energy Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(5):1235-1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar053.
9.
de GorterHarryJustDavid R. (2010). “The Social Costs and Benefits of Biofuels: The Intersection of Environmental, Energy and Agricultural Policy.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(1):4-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppp010.
10.
DumortierJeromeHayesDermot J.CarriquiryMiguelDongFengxiaDuXiaodongElobeidAmaniFabiosaJacinto F.TokgozSimla (2011). “Sensitivity of Carbon Emission Estimates from Indirect Land-Use Change.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33(3):428-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppr015.
11.
FargioneJosephHillJasonTilmanDavidPolaskyStephenHawthornePeter (2009). “Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt.” Science, 326(5952):527–528.
12.
FischerCarolynParryIan WHPizerWilliam A (2003). “Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(3):523-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00002-0.
13.
GallagherP. W.BrubakerH.ShapouriH. (2005). “Plant size: capital cost relationships in the dry mill ethanol industry.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(6):565-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.biombioe.2005.01.001.
14.
GallagherP. W.ShapouriH. (2005). “USDA’s 2002 Ethanol Cost-of-Production Survey.” Technical Report 841, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Economist.
15.
GardnerBruce (2007). “Fuel Ethanol Subsidies and Farm Price Support.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 5(4):1–20.
16.
GrahamR. L.NelsonR.SheehanJ.PerlackR. D.WrightL. L. (2007). “Current and Potential U.S. Corn Stover Supplies.” Agronomy Journal, 99(1):1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0222.
17.
GreenstoneMichaelKopitsElizabethWolvertonAnn (2011). “Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon for Use in U.S. Federal Rulemakings: A Summary and Interpretation.” Working Paper 16913, National Bureau of Economic Research. Hamelinck, Carlo N., Geertje Van Hooijdonk, and Andre P. C. Faaij (2005). “Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(4):384-410,2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.002.
HertelThomas W.GolubAlla A.JonesAndrew D.O’HareMichaelPlevinRichard J.KammenDaniel M. (2010). “Effects of U.S. maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses.” BioScience, 60(3):223-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.8.
20.
HollandStephen P.HughesJonathan E.KnittelChristopher R.ParkerNathan C. (2013). “Some Inconvenient Truths about Climate Change Policy: The Distributional Impacts of Transportation Policies.” Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
21.
HollandStephen P.HughesJonathan E.KnittelChristopher R. (2009). “Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1):106–46.
22.
HollandStephen P. (2012). “Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(3):375–387.
23.
JaffeAdam B. and Robert N. Stavins (1995). “Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3):S43-S63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1060.
24.
JohnstoneNickHascsicIVanPoppDavid (2010). “Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts.” Environmental andResource Economics, 45(1):133-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1.
25.
JungChulhoKrutillaKerryBoydRoy (1996). “Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: An evaluation of policy alternatives.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(1):95-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0007.
26.
KalogoYoussoufHabibiShivaMacLeanHeather L.JoshiSatish (2007). “Environmental Implications of Municipal Solid Waste-Derived Ethanol.” Environmental Science and Technology, 41(1):35-41,2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es061117b.
27.
KeeneyRomanHertelThomas W. (2009). “The Indirect Land Use Impacts of United States Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(4):895-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01308.x.
28.
KhannaMadhuAndoAmy W.TaheripourFarzad (2008). “Welfare Effects and Unintended Consequences of Ethanol Subsidies.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 30(3):411–421.
29.
LapanHarveyMoschiniGianCarlo (2012). “Second-best biofuel policies and the welfare effects of quantity mandates and subsidies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(2):224-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.10.001.
30.
LubowskiRuben N.VesterbyMarlowBucholtzShawnBaezAlbaRobertsMichael J. (2002). “Major Uses of Land in the United States.” Technical report, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2006.
31.
McAloonA.TaylorF.YeeW.IbsenK.WooleyR. (2000). “Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks.” Technical Report NREL/TP-580-28893, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
32.
MillimanScott R. and Raymond Prince (1989). “Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17(3):247-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(89)90019-3.
33.
MonteroJuan-Pablo (2002). “Permits, standards, and technology innovation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1):23-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1194.
34.
National Agricultural Statistics Service (2009). “2007 Census of Agriculture, 2009.” Accessed February 1.
35.
NelsonRichard (2010). “National Biomass Resource Assessment and Supply Analysis.”
36.
ParkerNathan C. (2011). Modeling Future Biofuel Supply Chains using Spatially Explicit Infrastructure Optimization. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis.
37.
ParkerNathan C. (2012). “Spatially explicit projection of biofuel supply for meeting renewable fuel standard.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2287):72–79.
38.
RajagopalD.PlevinRichard J. (2013). “Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies.” Energy Policy, 56(0):75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.076.
39.
Renewable Fuels Association (2009). “Biorefinery Locations, 2009.” Accessed December 3.
40.
RobertsMichael J. and Wolfram Schlenker (2013). “Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the U.S. Ethanol Mandate.” American Economic Review, 103(6):2265–95.
41.
SearchingerTimothyHeimlichRalphHoughtonR. A.DongFengxiaElobeidAmaniFabiosaJacintoTokgozSimlaHayesDermotYuTun-Hsiang (2008). “Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change.” Science, 319(5900):1238-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861.
42.
SimmonsP.GoldsteinN.KaufmanS.ThemelisN.ThompsonJ.Jr. (2006). “The State of Garbage in America.” BioCycle, 47(3):26–43.
43.
SpatariSabrinaZhangYiminMacLeanHeather L. (2007). “Life Cycle Assessment of Switchgrass- and Corn Stover-Derived Ethanol-Fueled Automobiles.” Environmental Science and Technology, 39(24):9750-9758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es048293 +.
44.
State of California (2010). “Low Carbon Fuel Standard.” In California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Subchapter 10, Article4, Subarticle 7.
45.
United States Department of Agriculture (2010). “Office of the Chief Economist, World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA Agricultural Projections to 2019.” Technical Report OCE-2010-1.
46.
U.S. Congress (2007). “Energy Independence and Security Act, H.R. 6.” In Public Law No: 110–140.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010). “Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis.” Technical report.
49.
WooleyR.RuthM.SheehanJ.IbsenK.MajdeskiH.GalvezA. (1999). “Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis current and futuristic scenarios.” Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
50.
WullschlegerE. B.DavisE. B.BorsukM. E.GundersonC. A.LyndL. R. (2010). “Biomass Production in Switch-grass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield.” Agronomy Journal, 102:1158-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0087.
51.
ZhangYiminJoshiSatishMacLeanHeather L. (2010). “Can ethanol alone meet California’s low carbon fuel standard? An evaluation of feedstock and conversion alternatives.” Environmental Research Letters, (5):1–14.
52.
ZilbermanDavidHochmanGalRajagopalDeepakSextonSteveTimilsinaGovinda (2013). “The Impact of Biofuels on Commodity Food Prices: Assessment of Findings.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2):275-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas037.
