AndréJ.BonnansF.CornibertL. (2009). “Optimization of Capacity Expansion Planning for Gas Transportation Networks.” European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3): 1019-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.045.
2.
BootsM. G.RijkersF. A. M.HobbsB. F. (2004). “Trading in the Downstream European Gas Market: A Successive Oligopoly Approach.” The Energy Journal, 25(3): 73-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol25-no3-5.
3.
BrookeA.KendrickD.MeerausA.RamanR. (2008). GAMS: A User's Guide, http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/bigdocs/GAMSUsersGuide.pdf
4.
BP (2011). Statistical Review of World Energy, http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.
5.
DieckhöhnerC. (2012). “Simulating Security of Supply Effects of the Nabucco and South Stream Projects for the European Natural Gas Market.” The Energy Journal, 33(3): 153-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.3.6.
6.
EC (European Commission, 2006). Decision No. 1364/2006/EC of 6 September 2006 laying down guidelines for trans-European energy networks.
7.
EC (2011a). Energy Roadmap 2050. COM(2011) 885 final. Brussels, Belgium, 15 December 2011.
8.
EC (2011b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility. COM(2011) 665 final. Brussels, Belgium, 19 October 2011.
9.
EC (2011c). 2009-2010 Report on progress in creating the internal gas and electricity market. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels, Belgium, 9 June 2011.
10.
EggingR.G. (2010). Multi-Period Natural Gas Market Modeling—Applications, Stochastic Extensions and Solution Approaches. College Park: University of Maryland.
11.
EggingR.GabrielS. A. (2006). “Examining Market Power in the European Natural Gas Market.” Energy Policy, 34(17): 2762-2778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.018.
12.
EggingR.GabrielS. A.HolzF.ZhuangJ. (2008). “A Complementarity Model for the European Natural Gas Market.” Energy Policy, 36(7): 2385-2414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.044.
13.
EggingR.GabrielS. A.HolzF. (2010). “The World Gas Model—a multi-period mixed complementarity model for the global natural gas market.” Energy, 35(10): 4016-4029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.053.
14.
EggingR.HolzF. (2016) “Risks in global natural gas markets: investment, hedging and trade.” Energy Policy, 94: 468-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.016.
15.
EEggingR.HolzF.GabrielS. A.von HirschhausenC. (2009). “Representing GASPEC with the World Gas Model.” The Energy Journal, Special Issue “World Natural Gas Markets and Trade: A Multi-Modeling Perspective”: 97-117.
16.
EggingR. (2013). “Benders Decomposition for Multi-Stage Stochastic Mixed Complementarity Problems—Applied to a Global Natural Gas Market Model.” European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2): 341-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.024.
17.
ENTSO-G (2015): “Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2015.” European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas, Brussels, Belgium.
18.
EU (2009). Regulation (EC) No 663/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy. Brussels, Belgium.
19.
FacchineiF.PangJ.-S. (2003). Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems. Vol. 1 and 2, Springer, New York.
20.
FerrisM.C.MunsonT. S. (2000). “Complementarity Problems in GAMS and the PATH Solver.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24(2): 165-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00092-X.
21.
FodstadM.MidthunK.EggingR.TomasgardA. (2016). “Natural Gas Infrastructure in Europe: Stochastic Modeling of an Uncertain Demand.” The Energy Journal, 37, Special Issue “Cross-Border Coordination for Sustainable Energy Security,” this issue.
22.
Groupe International des Importeurs de Gaz Naturel Liquéfié (GIIGNL) (2011). The LNG Industry. http://www.giignl.org/fr/home-page/lng-industry/
23.
GolombekR.GjelsvikE.RosendahlK. E. (1995). “Effects of Liberalizing the Natural Gas Markets in Western Europe.” The Energy Journal, 16(1): 85-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol16-no1-6.
24.
GTE (2011). The European Natural Gas Network (Capacities at cross-border points on the primary market). August2011. http://www.entsog.eu/maps/transmission-capacity-map/2011
25.
HolzF.von HirschhausenC.KemfertC. (2008). “A Strategic Model of European Gas Supply (GASMOD).” Energy Economics, 30(3): 766-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.018.
26.
HolzF.RichterP. M.EggingR., 2015. “A global perspective on the future of natural gas: Resources, trade, and climate constraints.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(1): 85-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu016.
27.
HuppmannD. (2013). “Endogenous production capacity investment in natural gas market equilibrium models.” European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2): 503-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.048.
28.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012. OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
29.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015). World Energy Outlook 2015. OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
30.
KnopfB.ChenY.-H. H.De CianE.FörsterH. H.KanudiaA.KarkatsouliI.KeppoI.KoljonenT.SchumacherK.Van VuurenD. P. (2013). “Beyond 2020—Strategies and costs for transforming the European energy system.” Climate Change Economics, 4 (Special Issue on “The EMF28 Study on Scenarios for Transforming the European Energy System”): 1340001 (38 pages).
31.
LabrietM.KanudiaA.LoulouR. (2012). “Climate mitigation under an uncertain technology future: A TIAM-World analysis.” Energy Economics, 34(Supplement 3): 366-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.016.
32.
LiseW.HobbsB. F. (2008). “Future Evolution of the Liberalised European Gas Market: Simulation Results with a Dynamic Model.” Energy, 33(7): 989-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.02.012.
33.
LochnerS.BotheD. (2007). From Russia with Gas—An Analysis of the Nordstream Pipeline’s Impact on the European Gas Transmission System with the TIGER-Model. EWI Working Paper No. 07.02, Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI).
34.
MathiesenL.RolandK.ThonstadK. (1987). “The European Natural Gas Market: Degrees of Market Power on the Selling Side.” In Natural Gas Markets and Contracts, edited by GolombekRolfHoelMichaelVislieJonNorth-Holland, 27-58.
35.
MidthunK. T.BjorndalM.TomasgardA. (2012). “Modeling optimal economic dispatch and system effects in natural gas networks.” The Energy Journal, 30(4): 155-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No4-6.
36.
PaltsevS.ReillyJ. M.JacobyH. D.EckausR. S.McFarlandJ.SarofimM.AsadoorianM.BabikerM. (2005). The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4, MIT Joint Program Report 125, August, 72 p.
37.
PaltsevS. (2011). Russia’s Natural Gas Export Potential up to2050. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Report No. 201.
38.
PernerJ.SeeligerA. (2004). “Impact of a Gas Cartel on the European Market—Selected Results from the Supply Model EUGAS.” Utilities Policy, 12(3): 291-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2004.04.014.
39.
RichterP. M.HolzF. (2015). “All quiet on the Eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe.” Energy Policy, 80: 177-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.024.
40.
SternJ. (2010). The new security environment for European gas: Worsening geopolitics and increasing global competition for LNG. In: LévêqueF.GlachantJ.-M.BarquínJ.HirschhausenC.v.HolzF.NuttallW. J.(Eds.), Security of Energy Supply in Europe: Natural Gas, Nuclear and Hydrogen. Cheltenham Glos, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing, 56-90http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781849806961.00009.
41.
Van OostvoornF. (2003). Long-Term Gas Supply Security in an Enlarged Europe. ECN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Available online: ftp://www.nrg-nl.com/pub/www/library/report/2003/c03122.pdf.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.