Non-OECD Asian economies comprise about 34% of world primary energy demand, 60% of population and 65% of the world’s poor, and will account for more than 60% of the total increase in energy consumption between 2015 and 2040. Energy sector reforms in non-OECD Asia are thus significant for global energy use, sustainability and socio-economic welfare. The region has experienced a slow and difficult reform path and after more than two decades of reform efforts it is time to take stock of their outcomes. Using a novel dataset assembled for this purpose for the period 1990-2013 for 17 non-OECD Asian countries, we apply instrumental variables regression techniques to several electricity sector reform outcome models. We find that the standard reform model has had limited benefits, largely due to sectoral heterogeneity and institutional endowments. We also show empirical evidence of the theoretical trade-offs between technical efficiency, economic and welfare objectives of reforms. The results call for rethinking of the effectiveness of reforms and awareness of the effects of key reform steps on different outcomes. This is useful for balancing the trade-offs among competing reform objectives.
ArmstrongM.SappingtonD.E.M. (2006). “Regulation, Competition and Liberalization.” Journal of Economic LiteratureXLIV: 325-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.442.325.
2.
AngristJ.PischkeJ.S., (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist Companion, Princeton University Press.
3.
BalzaL.MercadoJ. (2013). Privatization, Institutional Reform, and Performance in the Latin American Electricity Sector, Infrastructure and Environment Department Energy Division INE/ENE Technical Note No. IDB-TN-599, Inter-American Development Bank.
4.
BasmannR.L. (1960). “On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics.” Journal of the American Statistical Association55: 650-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483365.
5.
BaumC.F.SchafferM.E.StillmanS. (2003). “Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing.” Stata Journal3(1): 1-31.
6.
BaumC.F. (2006). An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
7.
BenitezD.A.ChisariO.EstacheA. (2001). Can the Gains from Argentina’s Utilities Reform Offset Credit Shocks?, Working Paper No. DP2001/33, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki.
8.
BigernaS.BollinoC.A.PolinoriP. (2016). Market Power and Transmission Congestion in the Italian Electricity Market, The Energy Journal37(2): 133-154. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.sbig.
9.
BoccanfusoD.EstacheA.SavardL. (2009a). A Macro-Micro Analysis of the Effects of Electricity Reform in Senegal on Poverty and Distribution, The Journal of Development Studies45 (3): 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802582361.
10.
BoccanfusoD.EstacheA.SavardL. (2009b). Electricity Reforms in Mali: A Macro Micro Analysis of the Effects on Poverty and Distribution, South African Journal of Economics77(1): 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2009.01205.x.
11.
BorensteinS. (2003). The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California’s Restructuring Disaster, Journal of Economic Perspectives16(1): 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027175.
12.
BrennemanA.KerfM. (2002). Infrastructure and Poverty Linkages: A Literature Review. The World Bank, Mimeo.
13.
BrunoG.S.F. (2005). “Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Unbalanced Panel Data Models with a Small Number of Individuals.” CESPRI Working Paper 165.
14.
BrunsS. B.GrossC.SternD.I. (2014). “Is There Really Granger Causality between Energy Use and Output?” The Energy Journal35(4): 101-134. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.4.5.
15.
BunM.J.G.KivietJ.F. (2003). “On the diminishing returns of higher-order terms in asymptotic expansions of bias.” Economics Letters79(2): 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00299-9.
16.
ByeT.HopeE. (2005). “Deregulation of electricity markets—The Norwegian experience”, Discussion Papers 433, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
17.
ChangY.LiY. (2013). The Singapore Electricity Market: From Partial to Full Competition, in SioshansiF.P.Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New Paradigms, New Challenges, New Approaches, Elsevier Global Energy Policy and Economics Series. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397891-2.00024-9.
18.
ChisariO.EstacheA.RomeroC. (1999). Winners and Losers from the Privatisation and Regulation of Utilities: Lessons from a General Equilibrium Model of Argentina, World Bank Economic Review13(2), pp. 357-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/13.2.357.
19.
CubbinJ.SternJ. (2004). “Regulatory Effectiveness: The Impact of Good Regulatory Governance on Electricity Industry Capacity and Efficiency in Developing Countries.” Policy Research Working Paper 3536, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
20.
CubbinJ.SternJ. (2006). “The Impact of Regulatory Governance and Privatization on Electricity Industry Generation Capacity in Developing Economies.” World Bank Economic Review20(1): 115-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj004.
21.
DupuyM.WestonF.HoveA. (2015). Power Sector: Deepening Reforms to Reduce Emissions, Improve Air Quality, and Promote Economic Growth, Paulson Institute.
22.
DurbinJ.WatsonG.S. (1951). “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regressions II.” Biometrika38(1-2): 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159.
23.
DurbinJ. (1954). Errors in Variables. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22: 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1401917.
24.
EberhardA.GratwickK.MorellaE.AntmannP. (2016). Independent Power Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from Five Key Countries. Directions in Development—Energy and Mining. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0800-5.
25.
EIA (2017). International Energy Outlook, US Energy Information Administration.
26.
ErdogduE. (2011). “The Impact of Power Market Reforms on Electricity Price-Cost Margins and Cross-Subsidy Levels: A Cross Country Panel Data Analysis.” Energy Policy39(3): 1080-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2010.11.023.
27.
ErdogduE. (2013). “Implications of Liberalization Policies on Government Support to R&D: Lessons for Electricity Markets.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews17: 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.030.
28.
ErdogduE. (2014). “Investment, Security of Supply and Sustainability in the Aftermath of Three Decades of Power Sector Reform.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews31: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.014.
29.
ESMAP (2011). “Revisiting Policy Options on the Market Structure in the Power Sector”, Energy Sector and Mining Assistance Program (ESMAP), The World Bank, Washington D.C.
30.
EstacheA.Gomez-LoboA.LeipzigerD. (2000). Utility Privatization and the Needs of the Poor in Latin America, The World Bank, Mimeo.
31.
EstacheA.ChisariO.Waddams-PriceC. (2003). “Access by the Poor in Latin America’s Utility Reform: Subsidies and Service Obligation.” ULB Institutional Repository 2013/44068, ULB—Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
32.
FrankelJ.A.RomerD.H. (1999). “Does Trade Cause Growth?” American Economic Review89(3): 379-99. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379.
33.
GratwickK.N.EberhardA. (2008). “Demise of the Standard Model for Power Sector Reform and the Emergence of Hybrid Power Markets.” Energy Policy36(10): 3948-60. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2008.07.021.
34.
GrublerA.JohanssonT.B.MundacaL.NakicenovicN.PachauriS.RiahiK.RognerH.H.StrupeitL. (2012): Chapter 1—Energy Primer. In Global Energy Assessment——Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 99-150.
35.
HahnJ.HausmanJ.A. (2003). “Weak instruments: Diagnosis and Cures in Empirical Econometrics.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings93: 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946912.
36.
HallA.R. (2005). Generalized Method of Moments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
HallD.EmmanueleL.de la MotteR. (2005). “Public Resistance to Privatisation in Water and Energy.” Developmentin Practice15(3; 4): 286-301.
38.
HansenL.P (1982). “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica50: 10291054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775.
39.
HattoriT.TsutsuiM. (2004). “Economic Impact of Regulatory Reforms in the Electricity Supply Industry: A Panel Data Analysis for OECD Countries.” Energy Policy32: 823-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00004-1.
40.
HausmanJ.A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica46: 1251-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.
41.
HayashiF. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
HeniszW.J.ZelnerB.A. (2002). “The Political Economy of Private Electricity Provision in Southeast Asia.” WP 2001-02, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
43.
IEA (2014). “World Energy Outlook.” International Energy Agency, Paris.
44.
IEA (2016). “World Energy Outlook.” International Energy Agency, Paris.
45.
JamasbT.MotaR.NewberyD.PollittM. (2005). “Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries: A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Determinants and Performance.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3549, The World Bank, March, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3549.
46.
JamasbT.SenA. (2013). “Not Seeing the Wood for the Trees? Electricity Market Reform in India.” in SioshansiF.P.Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New Paradigms, New Challenges, New Approaches, Elsevier Global Energy Policy and Economics Series.
47.
JamasbT.NepalR.TimilsinaG. (2017). “A Quarter Century of Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries.” The Energy Journal38(3): 195-234. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.3.tjam.
48.
JosephK.L. (2010) “The Politics of Power: Electricity Reform in India.” Energy Policy38(1): 503-511.
49.
JoskowP. L. (1998). “Electricity Sectors in Transition.” The Energy Journal19(2): 25-52. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol19-No2-3.
50.
JoskowP. L. (2008). “Lessons Learned from Electricity Market Liberalization.” The Energy Journal, 29Special Issue No. 2: 9-42.
51.
JudsonR.A.OwenA.L. (1999). “Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide for Macroeconomists.” Economics Letters65: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00130-5.
52.
KahnA.E. (1979). “Applications of Economics to an Imperfect World.” American Economic Review69(2): 1-13.
53.
KennedyP. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
54.
KessidesI. (2012). “The Impacts of Electricity Sector Reforms in Developing Countries.” The Electricity Journal25(6): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2012.07.002.
55.
KessidesI.N. (2013). “Chaos in Power: Pakistan’s Electricity Crisis.” Energy Policy55: 271-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.005.
56.
KhandkerS.R.BarnesD.F.SamadH.F. (2012a). “Are the Energy Poor also Income Poor? Evidence from India.” Energy Policy47: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.028.
57.
KhandkerS.R.BarnesD.F.SamadH.F. (2012b). “The Welfare Impacts of Rural Electrification in Bangladesh.” The Energy Journal33(1): 187-206. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-7.
58.
KivietJ.F. (1995). “On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics68 (1): 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E.
59.
KwokaJ. (2008). “Restructuring the U.S. Electric Power Sector: A Review of Recent Studies.” Review of Industrial Organization32: 165-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9171-2.
60.
LeeK.MiguelE.WolframC. (2016). “Empirical Evidence on the Demand for and Costs of Rural Electrification.” NBER Working Paper No. 22292, National Bureau of Economic Research, USA.
61.
LeipzigerD.FayM.WodonQ.YepesT. (2003). “Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: The Role of Infrastructure.” Policy Research Working Paper 3163, The World Bank, Washington D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3163.
62.
MalikK.CropperM.LimonovA.SinghA. (2015). “The Impact of Electricity Sector Restructuring on Coal-Fired Power Plants in India.” The Energy Journal36(4): 287-312. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.4.kmal.
63.
MMEE (2010). Maldives Ministry of Housing and Environment. Maldives National Energy Policy, Government of Maldives.
64.
MukherjeeM. (2014). “Private participation in the Indian Power Sector: Lessons from Two Decades of Experience.” Directions in Development: Energy and Mining, Washington D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0339-0.
65.
NagayamaH. (2007). “Effects of Regulatory Reforms in the Electricity Supply Industry on Electricity Prices in Developing Countries.” Energy Policy35(6): 3440-62. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2006.12.018.
66.
NagayamaH. (2009). “Electric Power Sector Reform Liberalisation and Electric Power Prices in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis Using International Panel Data.” Energy Economics31(3): 463-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.12.004.
67.
NagayamaH. (2010). “Impacts on Investments, and Transmission/Distribution Loss through Power Sector Reforms.” Energy Policy38(7): 3453-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.019.
68.
NepalR.JamasbT. (2012a). “Reforming the Power Sector in Transition: Do Institutions Matter?” Energy Economics34(5): 1675-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.002.
69.
NepalR.JamasbT. (2012b). “Reforming Small Electricity Systems under Political Instability: The Case of Nepal.” Energy Policy40: 242-51.
70.
NewberyD.M. (1996). “Privatisation and Liberalisation of Network Utilities.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 9620, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
71.
NewberyD.M. (2005). “Electricity Liberalization in Britain: The Quest for a Satisfactory Wholesale Market Design.” The Energy Journal26(Special Issue): 43-70. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-NoSI-3.
NganH.W. (2010). “Electricity Regulation and Electricity Market Reforms in China.” Energy Policy38: 2142-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.044.
74.
PollittM. (2004). “Electricity Reform in Chile: Lessons for Developing Countries.” Journal of Network Industries5(3-4): 221-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359170400500301.
75.
Productivity Commission (1996). Reform and the Distribution of Income—An Economy-Wide Approach, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
76.
RaineriR.DynerbI.GonicJ.CastrodN.OlayaeY.and FrancoeC. (2013). “The integration of Latin American Energy Markets: An Outstanding Dilemma” in SioshansiF.P.Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New Paradigms, New Challenges, New Approaches, Elsevier Global Energy Policy and Economics Series. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397891-2.00014-6.
77.
SantiagoA.RoxasF. (2010). “Understanding Electricity Market Reforms and the Case of Philippine Deregulation.” The Electricity Journal23(2): 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2010.02.003.
78.
SarganJ.D. (1958). “The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables.” Econometrica26: 393-415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907619.
79.
SenA.JamasbT. (2012). “Diversity in Unity: An Empirical Analysis of Electricity Deregulation in Indian States.” The Energy Journal33(1): 83-130.
80.
SenA. (2014). “Divergent Paths to a Common Goal? An Overview of Challenges to Electricity Sector Reform in Developing versus Developed Countries.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies Working Paper EL14. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-4.
81.
SinghA.JamasbT.NepalR.TomanM. (2015). “Cross Border electricity Cooperation in South Asia.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7328, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7328.
82.
SomaniS.LimW. (2014). “Powering the Future: Opportunities and Challenges for IPPs.” Southeast Asia Infrastructure Magazine, December.
SteinerF. (2000). “Regulation, Industry Structure and Performance in the Electricity Supply Industry.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 238, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/880084226021.
85.
SteinerF. (2001). “Industry Structure and Performance in the Electricity Supply Industry.” OECD Economic Studies32(I): 143-182. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2001-art5-en.
86.
StrahornE. (2011). “An Analysis of the Barriers to Cross Border Trade in Hydroelectricity in the Himalayas.” Himalayan Research Papers Archive10 (1).
87.
TongiaR. (2007). “The Political Economy of Indian Power Sector Reforms.” In VictorD.HellerT.C.The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform: The Experiences of Five Major Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493287.005.
88.
VictorD.HellerT.C. (2007). The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform: The Experiences of Five Major Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493287.
89.
VuK.M.GurtooA. (2014). “Utility Sector Performance Post Reforms: Investigating the South Asian Economies.” Poverty and Public Policy6(2): 157-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.68.
90.
WDI (2017). World Bank World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
91.
WilliamsJ.H.GhanadanR. (2006). “Electricity Reform in Developing and Transition Countries: A Reappraisal.” Energy31: 815-44. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.energy.2005.02.008.
92.
WisuttisakP (2012). “Regulation and Competition Issues in Thai Electricity Sector.” Energy Policy44: 185-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.038.
93.
WolakF. (2003). “Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market, 19982000.” American Economic Review93(2): 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947461.
94.
WooldridgeJ.M. (1995). Score Diagnostics for Linear Models Estimated by Two Stage Least Squares. In Advances in Econometrics and Quantitative Economics: Essays in Honor of Professor C.R. Rao, ed. G.S. Maddala, PC.B. Phillips, and T.N. Srinivasan, 66-87. Oxford: Blackwell.
95.
WooldridgeJ.M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
96.
WooldridgeJ.M. (2013). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 5th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.
97.
World Bank (1993). The World Bank’s Role in the Electric Power Sector: Policies for Effective Institutional, Regulatory, and Fnancial Reform, Mimeo, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
98.
WuX.SulistiyantoP (2013). “Independent Power Producer (IPP) Debacle in Indonesia and the Philippines: Path Dependence and Spillover Effects.” National University Singapore. Available from: http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/up-loads/2013/03/IPP_debacle1.pdf.
99.
WuD.M. (1974). “Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances: Finite Sample Results.” Econometrica42: 529-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911789.
100.
WuPY. (2005a). “Independent Power Producers in Thailand.” Working Paper 51, Stanford Programme on Energy and Sustainable Development.
101.
WuPY. (2005b). ”China’s Electric Power Market: The Rise and Fall of IPPs.” Working Paper 45, Stanford Programme on Energy and Sustainable Development.
102.
ZhangY.F.ParkerD.KirkpatrickC. (2005). “Competition, Regulation and Privatisation of Electricity Generation in Developing Countries: Does the Sequencing of the Reforms Matter?” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance45(2-3): 358-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.009.
103.
ZhangY.F.ParkerD.KirkpatrickC. (2008). “Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries: An Econometric Assessment of the Effects of Privatisation, Competition and Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics33(2): 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9039-7.
