Analysis of Unilateral CO,Control in the European Community and OECD *

Abstract

Whalley and Wigle (1991b) use a static, six-region, perfect competition, general equilibrium model to explore various global carbon tax policies designed to cut CO2 emissions. Their program is used here to model unilateral carbon taxes applied by large regions such as the EC or the OECD. Sample model results suggest that a 20% unilateral cut in EC carbon-based energy consumption achieves a 0.7% cut in world consumption in equilibrium; the ECs production of energy-intensive goods falls by 8.3%; but EC welfare is hardly changed, thanks to a shift in consumption towards nonenergy-intensive goods and to cheaper carbon-based energy imports. Unilateral action, even by large economies, therefore seems to be environmentally ineffective but economically neutral overall. However, international leadership effects or induced technical progress might change these conclusions. Also, Perroni and Rutherford (1991) find less extreme results for similar policies, probably because they model world energy markets very differently.

Keywords

CO2 emissions Europe Energy policy Carbon tax

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergman

Lars

(1991). “General Equilibrium Effects of Environmental Policy: A CGE-Modeling Approach.” Environmmral and Resource Economics 1 (1): 17-42.

Bumiaux

Jean-Marc

Martin

John P.

(1991). GREEN - A Multi-Region Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelfor Quantlifing the Costs of Curbing CO, Emissions: A Technical Manual. Working Paper No. 104. Paris: OECD Economics and Statistics Department (June).

Commission of the EC (1990). “Policy Options in View of the Community’s CO₂ Emission Stabilisation Target.” Working Paper of the General Secretariat of the Council No. CONS/ENV/90/13. Brussels: European Commission (December).

Edmonds

Jae

Barns

David W.

(1990). Estimating the, Marginal Cost of Reducing Global Fossil Fuel CO₂, Emissions. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory (September).

Glomsrod

Solveig

Vennemo

Haakon

Johnsen

Torgeir

(1992). “Stabilization of Emissions of CO₂: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (1): 53-70.

Karp

Newbery

D.M.

(1991). “OPEC and the US Oil Import Tariff.” The Economic Joumal 101 (March): 303-13.

Kennedy

(1964). “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution.” The Economic Journal 74: 541-47.

Manne

Alan S. and Richard G. Richels

(1991). “Global CO2 Emission Reductions -- the Impacts of Rising Energy Costa.” The Energy Journal 12(1): 87-107.

Markandya

Anil

(1990). “Sharing Global Carbon Emissions.” London: Department of Economics, University College London (June).

10.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1991). “To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” i%e Economic Journal 101: 920-37.

11.

Perroni

Carlo

Rutherford

Thomas F.

(1991). “International Trade in Carbon Emission Rights and Basic Materials: General Equilibrium Calculations for 2020.” Waterloo, Ont.: Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University.

12.

Pezzey

John

(1991). Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Control Strategies on UK Competitiveness: A Survey and Exploran’on of the Issues. Report to the UK Department of Trade and Industry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

13.

Proost

Van Regemotter

(1991). “The Carbon Tax as Principal Ecotax: Implementation and Effects in the Case of Belgium.” Leuven: Department of Economic Studies, Catholic University of Leuven.

14.

Rutherford

Thomas F.

(1989). “General Equilibrium Modelling with MPS/GE.” London, Ont.: Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario (April).

15.

Wballey

John

Wigle

Randall

(1991a). “Cutting Cq Emissions: The Effects of Alternative Policy Approaches.” The Energy Journal 12(1): 109-24.

16.

Whalley

John

Wigle

Randall

(1991b). “The International Incidence of Carbon Taxes.” in R. Dombusch and J. Poterba, eds., Economic Policy Responses to Global Warming. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.