Oil market data of the 1980s reject a simple, symmetric reduced-form model of dynamic oil demand in the OECD countries. Tests of price asymmetric long-run demand models produce ambiguous results. The pooled time series estimations find near unitary output elasticities, and reject linear demand models in favor of constant elasticity formulations. Despite large differences in product prices and crude prices, the data cannot reject use of a crude price model for aggregate oil demand. A reduced-form model symmetric in product prices but with technology trends for non-price oil conservation compares favorably with other formulations, and provides slightly lower projections of future oil demand intensity. However, even these lower econometric projections imply substantial increases in aggregate oil demand, increases which exceed those found in the conventional judgmental estimates.
AbodundeT.WirlF.KoestlF. (1985). “Energy Demand Elasticities: A Reassessment.” OPEC Review9: pp. 163-185.
2.
BerndtE. R.WoodD. O. (1975). “Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy.” Review of Economics and Statistics56: pp. 259-268.
3.
BerndtE.WoodD., (1986). “Energy Price Shocks and Productivity Growth in US and UK Manufacturing.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy2: pp. 1-31.
4.
BP International (1991). BP Statistical Review of World Energy, data diskettes, London.
5.
BrownStephen P. A.PhillipsKeith R. (1991). “US Oil Demand and Conservation.” Contemporary Policy Issues9: pp. 67-72.
6.
DahlC. A. (1986). “Gasoline Demand Survey.” The Energy Journal7(1): pp. 67-82.
7.
DargayJ. M. (1991). “The Irreversible Demand Effects of High Oil Prices: Motor Fuels in France, Germany and the UK.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, EE13.
8.
EdlefsenLee (1987). NONLIN.PRG written in Gauss 386 version 2.1, Aptech Systems, Inc., Kent, WA.
9.
Energy Modelling Forum (1991). International Oil Supplies and Demands, EMF-11, Stanford University.
10.
FiebigD. G.SealeJ.TheilH. (1987). “The Demand for Energy: Evidence from a Cross-Country Demand System.” Energy Economics9: pp. 149-153.
11.
FromholzerD. (1980). “The Impacts of Demand Dynamics and Consumer Expectations on World Oil Prices.” Energy and Environmental Policy Center, Harvard University.
12.
GatelyD. (1992). “Imperfect Price-Reversibility of U.S. Gasoline Demand: Asymmetric Responses to Price Increases and Declines.” The Energy Journal13(4): pp. 179-207.
13.
GatelyD. (1992a). “The Imperfect Price-Reversibility of World Oil Demand.” New York University, mimeo.
14.
GatelyD. (1992b). “Oil Demands in the US and Japan: Why the Demand Reductions Caused by the Price Increases of the 1970’s Won’t Be Reversed by the Price Declines of the 1980’s.” C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University, RR#92-09. Japan and the World Economy, forthcoming.
15.
GatelyD.RappoportPeter (1988). “Adjustment of U.S. Oil Demand to the Price Increases of the 1970s.” The Energy Journal9(1): pp. 93-107.
16.
GriffinJ. M. (1979). Energy Conservation in the OECD: 1980 to 2000, Cambridge: Ballinger.
17.
HestonA.SummersR. (1984) “Improved International Comparison of Real Product and Its Composition.” Review of Income and Wealth30: pp. 207-262.
18.
HoganWilliam W. (1980). “Dimensions of Energy Demand,” in H. Lansberg (ed.) Selected Studies on Energy: Background Papers for Energy: The Next Twenty Years, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 1-92.
19.
HoganWilliam W. (1988). “Oil Prices and Oil Demand,” in B. Mossavar-Rahmani , Lower Oil Prices: Mapping the Impact, Energy and Environmental Policy Center, Harvard University, pp. 42-72.
20.
HoganWilliam W. (1989). “A Dynamic Putty - Semi-Putty Model of Aggregate Energy Demand.” Energy Economics12: pp. 53-69.
21.
HoganWilliam W. (1990). “OECD Oil Demand and Oil Prices: A Comparative Analysis.” Energy and Environmental Policy Center, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, E-90-14.
22.
HoganWilliam W. (1992). “Oil Market Adjustments and the New World Order.” Center for Business and Government, Harvard University.
23.
International Energy Agency (1991). Energy Prices and Taxes, Paris.
24.
International Monetary Fund (1991). International Financial Statistics Yearbook, Washington, DC.
25.
JorgensonD. W.SlesnickD. T.StokerT. M. (1987). “Two Stage Budgeting and Consumer Demand for Energy,” in J.R. Moroney, ed., Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources, Vol. 6, Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 125-162.
26.
JorgensonD. W.FraumeniB. M. (1981). “Relative Prices and Technical Change,” in E. Berndt and B. Fields, eds., Modelling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 17-47.
27.
JudgeG. (1980). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley.
28.
KahnJ. A. (1986). “Gasoline Prices and the Used Automobile Market: A Rational Expectations Asset Price Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics: pp. 323-339.
29.
MorrisonM. B. (1987). “Will Oil Demand Recover? A Challenge to the Consensus.” Petroleum Review41: pp. 11-14.
30.
NguyenH. V. (1986). “Energy Elasticities Under Divisia and Btu Aggregation.” Energy Economics8: pp. 210-214.
31.
PeckS. C.WeyantJ. W. (1985). “Electricitý Growth in the Future.” Energy Journal6: pp. 23-43;
32.
PindyckR. S. (1979). The Structure of World Energy Demand, Cambridge: MIT Press.
33.
ShealyM. T. (1990). “Oil Demand Asymmetry in the OECD.” Proceedings, Energy Supply and Demand Balances: Options and Costs, IAEE Twelfth North American Conference, Ottawa, pp. 154-165.
34.
SweeneyJ.FrenchelD. (1986). “Price Asymmetries in the Demand for Energy.” Stanford University Center for Economic Policy Research, Publication No. 75.
35.
TraillB.ColmanD.YoungT. (1978). “Estimating Irreversible Supply Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics60: pp. 528-531.
36.
U.S. Department of Energy (1991). Annual Review of Energy.
37.
WalkerI. O.WirlF. (1992). “Asymmetric Energy Demand Due to Endogenous Efficiencies: An Empirical Investigation of the Transport Sector.” Technical University of Vienna, mimeo.
38.
WirlF. (1985). “Stable and Volatile Prices: An Explanation by Dynamic Demand,” in FeichtingerG. (ed.), Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis 2, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 263-277.
39.
WirlF. (1988). “Asymmetrical Energy Demand Patterns: Some Theoretical Explanations.” OPEC Review12: pp. 345-359.
40.
WirlF. (1990). “Dynamic Demand and Optimal OPEC Pricing: An Empirical Investigation.” Energy Economics12: pp. 174-176.
41.
WirlF. (1990a), “Stability of Price Reaction Functions When the Consumers Employ Rational Expectations.” Institute of Energy Economics, University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, mimeo.
42.
WollframR. (1971). “Positivistic Measures of Aggregate Supply Elasticities: Some New Approaches-Some Critical Notes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics53: pp. 356-359.
43.
WoodD. O. (chair), Demand Working Group (1974). Project Independence Report, Federal Energy Administration, Washington DC.
