The Bias in Price Elasticity Estimates Under Separability Between Electricity and Labor in Studies of Time-of-Use Electricity Rates: An Application to Israel
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1998
The Bias in Price Elasticity Estimates Under Separability Between Electricity and Labor in Studies of Time-of-Use Electricity Rates: An Application to Israel
Most time-of-use(TOU) studies of electricity use in the business sector have found little overall response, as measured by price elasticities, to TOU rates. These studies employed the assumption of weak separability between electricity and all other inputs. Here, we use the generalized Leontief cost function to show that when labor is included in the estimation, the electricity price elasticities are larger, in absolute values, than when labor is erroneously excluded. This result is demonstrated with data on electricity and labor for about 400 Israeli business customers. We also show that the omission of labor from the estimation may cause serious underestimation of the net welfare gains that result from changing a flat electricity price to a TOU rate.
ActonJ.P.ParkR.E. (1987). “Response to Time-of-Day Electricity Rates by Large Business Customers: Reconciling Conflicting Evidence.” Rand, R-3477-NSF.
2.
AignerD.J.HirschbergJ.G. (1985). “Commercial/Industrial Customer Response to Time-of-Use Electricity Prices: Some Experimental Results.” Rand Journal of Economics16: 341-355.
3.
AignerD.J.NewmanJ.TishlerA. (1994). “The Response of Small and Medium-Size Business Customers to Time-of-Use (TOU) Electricity Rates in Israel.” Journal of Applied Econometrics9: 283-304.
4.
AppelbaumE. (1979). “On the Choice of Functional Forms.” International Economic Review20: 449-458.
5.
BarnettW.A.LeeY.W. (1985). “The Global Properties of the Minflex Laurnet, Generalized Leontief, and Translog Flexible Functional Forms.” Econometrica53: 1421-1437.
6.
BerndtE.R.KhaledM.S. (1979). “Parametric Productivity Measurement and Choice Among Flexible Functional Forms.” Journal of Political Economy87: 1120-1146.
7.
BlackorbyC.PrimontD.RussellR.R. (1977). “On Testing Separability Restrictions with Flexible Functional Forms.” Journal of Econometrics5: 195-209.
8.
BlackorbyC.PrimontD.RussellR.R. (1978). Duality, Separability and Functional Structure: Theory and Economic Applications, North-Holland Publishers.
9.
BurnessH.S.PatrickR.H. (1991). “Peak-Load Pricing with Continuous and Interdependent Demand.” Journal of Regulatory Economics2: 69-88.
10.
CavesD.W.ChristensenL.R. (1980a). “Global Properties of Flexible Functional Forms.” American Economic Review70: 422-432.
11.
CavesD.W.ChristensenL.R. (1980b). “Econometric Analysis of Residential Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing Experiments.” Journal of Econometrics14: 287-306.
12.
DalalO. (1991). “Analysis of Industrial/Commercial Customers on TOU Rates.” The Israel Electric Corporation (IEC).
13.
DalalO.TishlerA. (1997). “The Effect of TOU Rate on the Demand for Electricity in the Business Sector in Israel”, forthcoming in The Bank of Israel Review.
14.
DentonF.T.JeffriesK.L.MountainD.C.RobbA.L.SpencerB.G. (1987). “The Response of an Industrial Firm to Alternative Electricity Rate Structure: An Optimization Model for Simulation Applications.” Resources and Energy9: 327-346.
15.
DennyM.MayJ.D. (1978). “Homotheticity and Real Value-Added in Canadian Manufacturing,” in Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Vol. II, FussM.McFaddenD., eds., North-Holland: 53-70.
16.
DiewertW.E. (1974). “Applications of Duality Theory,” in Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. II, IntriligatorM.D.KendrickD.A., eds., North-Holland: 106-171.
17.
DiewertW.E.WalesT.J. (1987). “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions.” Econometrica55: 43-68.
18.
FussM.McFaddenD.MundlakY. (1978). “A Survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production,” in Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Vol. II, FussM.McFaddenD., eds., North-Holland: 3-3.
19.
GreeneW.H. (1990). Econometric Analysis, third edition, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
20.
HirschbergJ.G.AignerD.J. (1983). “An Analysis of Commercial and Industrial Customer Response to Time-of-Use Rates.” The Energy Journal4 (Special Electricity Issue): 103-126.
21.
KohlerD.F. (1983). “The Bias in Price Elasticity Estimates Under Homothetic Separability: Implications for Analysis of Peak-Load Electricity Pricing,” with Discussion by: S.E. Atkinson, W.E. Barnett, D.W. Caves and L.R. Christensen, R.W. Parks, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics1: 202-228.
22.
PatrickR.H. (1990). “Rate Structure Effects and Regression Parameter Instability Across Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing Experiments.” Resources and Energy12: 179-195.
23.
ParkR.E.ActonJ.P. (1984). “Large Business Customer Response to Time-of-Day Electricity Rates.” Journal of Econometrics26: 229-252.
24.
SchwarzP. (1984). “The Estimated Effects on Industry of Time-of-Day Demand and Energy Electricity Prices.” The Journal of Industrial Economics32: 529-539.
25.
ShermanR. (1989). “Pricing Periods Under Rate of Return Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics1: 163-174.
26.
SpectorY.TishlerA.YeY. (1995). “Minimal Adjustment Costs and the Optimal Choice of Inputs Under Time-of-Use Electricity Rates.” Management Science41(10): 1679-1692.
27.
TishlerA. (1983). “The Industrial and Commercial Demand for Electricity under Time-of-Use Pricing.” Journal of Econometrics23: 369-384.
28.
TishlerA. (1984). “A Model of Industrial Demand for Electricity under Time-of-use Pricing and Three Labor Shifts.” Resources and Energy6: 107-127.
29.
TishlerA. (1989). “The Response of Large Firms to Different Schemes of Time-of-Use Pricing when the Production Function is Quadratic.” The Energy Journal10(2): 69-90.
30.
TishlerA. (1991). “Complementarity-Substitution Relationships in the Demand for Time-Differentiated Inputs under Time-of-Use Pricing.” The Energy Journal12(3): 137-148.
31.
TishlerA.LipovetskyS. (1992). “Flexible Functions: A Review,” Israel Institute of Business Research, Working Paper 31/92, Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University.
32.
TishlerA.LipovetskyS. (1997). “The Flexible CES-GBC Family of Cost Functions: Derivation and Application,” forthcoming in The Review of Economics and Statistics.
33.
TishlerA.YeY. (1993). “Minimal Adjustment Costs, Factor Demands and Seasonal Time-of-Use Electricity Rates.” Resources and Energy Economics15: 313-335.
34.
WooC.K. (1985). “Demand for Electricity of Small Nonresidential Customers under Time-of-Use (TOU) Pricing.” The Energy Journal6(4): 115-127.
