Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Plasma amino acid analysis is key to the diagnosis and monitoring of inherited disorders of amino acid synthesis, catabolism and transport. Ion exchange chromatography (IEC) is widely accepted as the gold standard method of analysis, but with the introduction of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods, this should now be questioned.

The analytical performance of three commercially available reagent kits, Waters AccQ Tag™ ULTRA LC-MS, SpOtOn Amino Acids LC-MS/MS and Chromsystems MassChrom® Amino Acid Analysis LC-MS/MS, were evaluated and compared with Biochrom Physiological Amino Acids ion exchange chromatography. Correlation with IEC was assessed by Passing-Bablok regression, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis for 21 common amino acids. Calculation of the total error from imprecision and bias was also used to benchmark performance.

The MassChrom® and SpOtOn kits demonstrated acceptable inter-batch imprecision (CV < 10%) and accuracy (mean bias < 10%), whereas the AccQ Tag™ ULTRA kit did not. Good correlation (CCC > 0.95) with Biochrom IEC was demonstrated for 10/21 analytes in both the MassChrom® and SpOtOn kits and 6/21 in the AccQ Tag™ ULTRA kit.

The LC-MS assay demonstrated variable analytical performance and correlated poorly with ion exchange chromatography. Both LC-MS/MS assays demonstrated comparable analytical performance and reasonable correlation with ion exchange chromatography. They also confer practical advantages which cannot be realized by ion exchange chromatography, superior specificity and significantly faster analysis time, suggesting that ion exchange chromatography should no longer be described as the gold standard method for plasma amino acid analysis.

Vitamin B12 deficiency frequently appears in phenylketonuria patients having a diet poor in natural protein. The aims of this study were to evaluate vitamin B12 status in phenylketonuria patients by using combined indicator of vitamin B12 status (cB12) as well as methylmalonic acid and homocysteine, more specific and sensitive markers, in comparison with healthy controls.

Fifty-three children and adolescents with phenylketonuria under dietary treatment and 30 healthy controls were assessed cross-sectionally. Serum vitamin B12 and folate concentrations were analysed by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma methylmalonic acid and total homocysteine concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography, respectively. cB12 was calculated by using a formula involving blood parameters.

Methylmalonic acid and folate concentrations in phenylketonuria group were higher compared with controls. Methylmalonic acid concentrations were high in 56.5% of the patients and 26.7% of the controls with normal vitamin B12 concentrations. Based on cB12, a significant difference within the normal values was detected between the groups. However, although 24.5% of phenylketonuria patients and 13.3% of controls had decreased vitamin B12 status according to cB12, there was no significant difference.

Children and adolescents with phenylketonuria having a strict diet can be at risk of functional vitamin B12 deficiency. This deficiency can be accurately determined by measuring methylmalonic acid concentrations. Calculation of cB12 as a biochemical index did not provide additional information compared with the measurement of methylmalonic acid alone, but may be helpful for classification of some patients with increased methylmalonic acid as having adequate vitamin B12 status.

A recent attempt to improve the diagnostic value of adjusted calcium addressed a primary care-specific adjusted calcium equation, but validated the new equation for Roche Cobas, BCG and NM-BAPTA methods only. In this study, we aim to validate a population-specific equation for other methods and platforms.

We collected retrospective patient data-sets from 15 hospital laboratories using a range of commercially available analytical platforms and methods for calcium and albumin measurements. Raw data-sets were collected and filtered according to Payne’s criteria, and separate adjusted calcium equations were derived for hospitalized and primary care patients.

Mean albumin and calcium results were significantly higher in primary care populations (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of hypocalcaemia using adjusted calcium ranged between 6% and 44% for inpatient data-sets and was higher in users of BCG methods. The application of community-specific adjustment equation to primary care data-sets reduced the prevalence of hypocalcaemia (mean 1.7%, range 0.8–3.7%).

We demonstrated that the use of a community-specific calcium adjustment equation to a primary care population reduces both the percentage and the variation of hypocalcaemia between different laboratories.

Laboratory comments appended on clinical biochemistry reports are common in the UK. Although popular with clinicians and the public, there is little evidence that these comments influence the clinical management of patients.

We provided reflex automated laboratory comments on all primary care lipid results including, if appropriate, recommendation of direct referral to the West Midlands Familial Hypercholesterolaemia service (WMFHS). Over a two-year period, the number GP referrals from the Wolverhampton City Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to the WMFHS were compared with four comparator CCGs of similar population size, who were not provided with reflex laboratory comments.

Over the study period, the WMFHS received more referrals from Wolverhampton GPs (241) than any other comparator CCG (range 8–65) and greater than the combined referrals (172) from all four comparator CCGs.

Targeted reflex laboratory comments may influence the clinical management of patients and may have a role in the identification of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Calcium circulates bound to albumin and changes in albumin concentration will therefore affect total calcium measurements. In order to mitigate this, correction factors are frequently used. The most widely used correction equation was described by Payne and colleagues in 1973. This equation was derived from well-defined hospitalized patients’ data. Current clinical practice is consistent with the general application of the adjusted calcium equation irrespective of clinical setting. This study aims to assess the validity of this approach by the derivation of a community care-specific adjusted calcium equation (‘community equation’) and the comparison of its performance to a hospitalized patient equation and ionized calcium.

Retrospective data were collected according to Payne’s criteria from an inpatient and community care setting. Data were used to derive the two equations: the in-patient equation and community equation. The outcome of these equations was compared with ionized calcium obtained from 123 healthy participants.

The community equation correctly identified the calcium status of 92% of the 123 healthy participants, while the inpatient equation identified 46% only. Regression analysis against ionized calcium showed a higher R² for the community equation than for the inpatient equation. Furthermore, we have shown that mean albumin and calcium concentrations are significantly different between these two populations.

In this study, we found that the diagnostic accuracy of the adjusted calcium equation in ambulant patients was improved by the derivation of a population-specific equation for the community care setting.

Current guidelines document persistent rectal bleeding as an alarm symptom in patients presenting to primary care. We studied whether a faecal immunochemical test could assist in their assessment.

From December 2015, faecal immunochemical tests were routinely available to primary care when assessing patients with new-onset bowel symptoms: general practitioners were encouraged to include faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) within any referral to secondary care. Results with f-Hb ≥10 μg Hb/g faeces were defined as positive. The incidence of significant bowel disease (SBD: colorectal cancer [CRC], higher-risk adenoma [HRA: any ≥1 cm, or three or more] and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]) at subsequent colonoscopy, referred symptoms and f-Hb were recorded.

Of 1447 patients with a faecal immunochemical test result and colonoscopy outcome, SBD was diagnosed in 296 patients (20.5%; 95 with CRC, 133 with HRA, and 68 with IBD). Four hundred and sixty-two patients (31.9%) reported rectal bleeding: 294 had f-Hb ≥10 μg Hb/g faeces. At colonoscopy, 105/294 had SBD versus 14/168 with rectal bleeding and f-Hb <10 μg Hb/g faeces (P < 0.0001), comprising one case of CRC (0.6%), 12 HRA (7.1%) and one new case of IBD (0.6%); further, the single cancer and 8 of the 12 HRA were located in the descending colon.

Patients with rectal bleeding and f-Hb <10 μg Hb/g faeces are unlikely to have SBD and could be investigated by sigmoidoscopy alone. Using the faecal immunochemical test to guide investigation of patients with rectal bleeding is a rational and practical way forward.