Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction

According to national trauma databases, 25% of all people injured have some type of facial injury. The gold standard for diagnosing bony trauma of the facial skeleton has been computed tomography (CT) scan. In 2011, the “Wisconsin criteria” were established and subsequently validated as a method to predict which patients truly have a facial fracture and warrant further imaging. The purpose of this study is to externally validate these criteria and determine the economic impact they might have on avoiding unnecessary CT scans.

This was a retrospective chart review. We collected 1000 patients who had undergone facial CT related to trauma and retrospectively applied the “Wisconsin criteria” based on physical exam documentation.

Of the 1000 facial CT scans obtained, we identified 408 fractures, 12% of which required operative intervention. The “Wisconsin criteria” applied to our patient population had a sensitivity of 90% and a negative predictive value of 93%. Using these criteria resulted in a missed fracture rate of 2.8%. Finally, had these criteria been used to determine when a facial CT scan was indicated, our institution could be saving over US$300 000 annually.

The “Wisconsin criteria” are a reliable method to screen for facial fracture in trauma patients. Using a validated instrument tool to guide decision-making, we can avoid obtaining low-value imaging studies. This can have a large economic impact while maintaining safety and reliability in accurate diagnosis.

The purpose of this article was to study and devise a classification of fracture patterns of the mandibular ramus to facilitate management.

Mandibular ramus fracture demographics in literature were reviewed along with evaluation of the patients diagnosed with mandibular ramus fractures who had reported to the emergency/outpatient clinic of our Institute in the last 5 years. Epidemiology of these ramus fractures was studied, and these ramus fractures were categorized into repetitive patterns on the basis of radiological observations in an effort to achieve a simplified classification.

A total of 1372 trauma patients were diagnosed with mandibular fractures, of which an incidence of 2.4% was recorded for ramus fractures. These were predominantly in males and mainly due to road traffic accidents commonly in people driving two-wheeler vehicles (64%). Ramus fractures seldom occur in isolation. Five predictable fracture patterns were observed and accordingly classified as types I to V. Type I was the most common and type IV the least. Open reduction was done in 45.5% patients with non-compression plating systems. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all patients.

The mandibular ramus fractures although rare need to be well understood and demarcated. The classification highlights the importance of this mandibular buttress and focuses on the importance of its technically and anatomically more complicated fracture treatment. Future studies are needed to compare the modalities of management.

Health-care disparities have been reported throughout medical literature for decades. While blatant explicit bias is not prevalent, a substantial body of research has been published suggesting that systemic biases related to sex, race, income, and insurance status likely exist. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the impact of patient race and insurance status on clinical decision-making in facial fracture repair in the United States. Thus, the objective of this project was to assess if race and insurance status impacted whether patients obtained open or closed treatment of simple mandibular fractures.

Patients who had either open or closed treatment of mandibular fractures were extracted from the 2012 and 2013 National Inpatient Sample and analyzed. Patients who had a length of stay longer than 3 days or died during their inpatient stay were excluded. These exclusion criteria were used to control for patients with polytrauma as well as complicated fractures. Univariate analysis was undertaken to elucidate different variable associations with the type of reduction performed. All covariates were then entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to test the variables simultaneously.

Patients with simple condylar, alveolar border, and closed mandibular fractures were more likely to undergo closed reduction (CR) on univariate analysis, as were patients with female gender and a fall mechanism (P value < .05). African Americans, Hispanics, and patients without insurance were more likely to undergo open reduction on univariate analysis (P value < .05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with simple condylar, subcondylar, alveolar border, or closed mandibular fractures were more likely to undergo a CR, as were patients with female gender and a firearm or fall mechanism (P < .05). However, neither race nor insurance status demonstrated a statistically significant association with closed or open reduction.

Anatomic location and mechanism of injury were the variables found to be significantly associated with patients undergoing open reduction versus CR of simple mandibular fractures—not race or insurance status.

The treatment of mandibular condyle fractures remains a controversial topic in maxillofacial surgery. No uniform treatment protocol is currently available.

We performed a retrospective monocentric cohort study of patients with condylar fractures and their treatment, including long-term follow-up by telephone, followed by a short review of the literature.

The available data on condylar fractures presenting at Leuven University Hospitals between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015, were analyzed. Cause, age, sex, fracture level, degree of displacement, associated facial fractures, malocclusion, type of treatment, and complications were noted. Follow-up by telephone was performed after an average 261 weeks for the conservative group.

A total of 109 condylar fractures were observed with a male/female ratio of 1.14:1. Most fractures were subcondylar, unilateral, displaced, caused by road traffic accidents, and treated conservatively.

In children and intracapsular fractures, conservative management remains the first choice. Maxillomandibular fixation should be used sparingly in children and for as short a time as possible. Some patients indicated for surgery can still have acceptable results if treated conservatively.

This article reviews cases of nasolacrimal obstruction (NLO) secondary to maxillofacial hardware placement.

A retrospective review was performed at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 of patients with NLO following maxillofacial reconstruction. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Francisco, adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. Patients were included if external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) confirmed previously placed maxillofacial hardware as the primary contributor to lacrimal outflow obstruction and had at least 3 months of follow-up.

Of 420 patients who underwent external DCR, 6 cases of implant-related NLO were identified. The mean age was 47.3 ± 9.6 years and 66.7% of patients were male. All patients presented with epiphora and 50% also had chronic dacryocystitis. Patients had prior maxillofacial hardware placement for paranasal sinus tumors (66.7%) or facial fractures (33.3%). In addition to external DCR, all patients had revision or removal of implants that were impeding lacrimal outflow by 2 mechanisms: (1) an orbital implant impinging the lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct (NLD) and/or (2) maxillofacial screws placed into the bony NLD or nasolacrimal fossa. Five of the 6 patients (83.3%) had complete resolution of symptoms and patency of the nasolacrimal system at their last follow-up visit (range 3-30 months).

NLO secondary to hardware placement, though infrequent, is underreported. Two mechanisms of hardware-induced NLO were encountered in this case series. Specific attention to nasolacrimal anatomy at the time of maxillofacial reconstruction may help minimize implant-induced NLO.

Fractures of the zygomatic bone can present with complicated aesthetic and neurological pathology. Specifically, management of isolated zygomatic fracture has been sparsely discussed in the literature, and most studies are based upon older techniques. Here, we compare the results of 2 critical operative techniques as well as review the available literature in the setting of isolated zygomatic fractures.

A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution from 2010 to 2018 examining for patients who had sustained an isolated zygomatic fracture confirmed by computed tomography scan. Patients were excluded if they sustained additional maxillofacial fractures. Demographical information, symptoms on presentation, fracture management modality, and postoperative course were all collected and examined.

A total of 218 patients were identified for inclusion. The average age of this cohort was 45.5 ± 18 years, with 77.5% being male. Assault (55%) was most the frequent cause of injury with accidents being the least common (17.9%). Most patients (78.8%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients who underwent operation more often presented with zygomatic deformity (97.7% vs 18.4%), paresthesia (29.5% vs 2.9%), and trismus (29.5% vs 6.9%) when compared to their nonoperatively managed counterparts. In all, 44 operatively managed patients underwent open reduction with or without eternal fixation (Gillies Approach vs Keen Approach). There were no significant differences in the presence of zygomatic deformity, paresthesia, and trismus between the 2 operative techniques.

Isolated zygomatic arch fractures can present with discerning symptoms. Unfortunately, the literature on appropriate management is not well described. We find external fixation to provide reestablishment of both form and function with minimal required exposure, although the outcomes may be similar without the use of external fixation.

There are multiple approaches to repairing orbital floor fractures. This study compares the postoperative complications of the subciliary and transconjunctival approaches.

The electronic medical records from 2 hospitals were screened for CPT codes associated with orbital floor reconstruction. A total of 184 patients were identified and included in the study. Patient characteristics and complications were compared by surgical approach.

Of the 184 patients, 82 (44.6%) were in the subciliary group and 102 (55.4%) were in the transconjunctival group. The overall postoperative complication rate was 25.5%. The most common of these were diplopia (11.4%), corneal injury (7.1%), proptosis (5.4%), and enopthalmos (4.9%). The complication rate was not statistically significant between the 2 groups.

Subciliary and transconjunctival approaches to orbital floor repair are equally safe. This study is limited by a smaller sample size, and a larger study will likely be necessary to fully address this question.

This article aims to compare the difference in postoperative results in patients treated with either a patient-specific (PSI) or a stock temporomandibular total joint replacement system.

The investigators performed a systematic review concerning postoperative results after placement of either a stock total joint replacement system or a PSI. PubMed Central, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Plus, Wiley Online Library, and EMBASE were used to conduct this search. All articles up to August 15, 2018, were scrutinized. All included articles were nonrandomized cohort studies. Maximal mouth opening (MMO) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain and diet before and after surgery were evaluated. The Methodological Index for NonRandomized Studies scale was used for quality assessment. Weighted mean difference was calculated and pooled by meta-analysis using random-effect models.

The search identified 1581 articles, of which 15 were included. The average risk of bias was low. Both systems achieved significant increases in MMO and decreased VAS pain scores at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery. No significant difference was found between the system types. Both achieved significant improvements in dietary VAS scores, with a more significant improvement for stock implants.

Due to the lack of detailed diagnostic evaluation tools allowing proper start-point categorization, there is a significant risk for selection bias in the pooled data. The PSI is more frequently chosen for cases with more significant joint degeneration, skewing postoperative results. A patient-fitted implant can provide significant operative and patient-centered advantages over a stock implant, which will likely be confirmed when observational cohort studies have included indications like the ones for stock prostheses. Furthermore, while current US Food and Drug Administration-approved stock implants contain cobalt -chromium -molybdenum, the newly manufactured PSI are made of titanium alloy, diminishing the risks of morbidity and implant failure.

Palatal defects are encountered following tumor extirpation, trauma, or congenitally. Among the known alternatives, radial artery free forearm flap (RAFF) is a versatile flap that confers good results in head and neck reconstruction, but donor-site morbidity has been an issue of discontent among the plastic surgeons. This limitation needs to be studied further and addressed considering the unmatched quality of this tissue.

This study aims to weigh the impact of the functional edge of this flap against the unpopular donor-site morbidity on a group of patients.

This is a retrospective analysis of recuperation of palatal function and patient concerns with the donor-site function and cosmesis on 7 consecutive patients with small-to-moderate palatal defects reconstructed with RAFF.

Postoperative recovery of speech, palatal movement, and restoration of oromaxillary interface was assessed using objective tests, such as speech intelligibility testing and articulation studies. Simultaneously, subjective donor-site function and cosmesis were assessed using Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI), and donor limb sensory testing.

Mean PSAS score was 8.28/60, and UEFI score reported was 77/80, which reflect high patient satisfaction with the donor site. Nasoendoscopy shows remarkable restoration of palate anatomy. Intelligibility testing depicts near-normal speech understandability, whereas articulation studies revealed distortions post-palatal reconstruction with RAFF. Radial artery free forearm flap should be considered as the forerunner of reconstruction in palatal defects involving less than 50%.