Journal of Biological Rhythms

The identification and characterization of rhythmically expressed mRNAs have been an active area of research over the past 20 years, as these mRNAs are believed to produce the daily rhythms in a wide range of biological processes. Circadian transcriptome studies have used mature mRNA as a primary readout and focused largely on rhythmic RNA synthesis as a regulatory mechanism underlying rhythmic mRNA expression. However, RNA synthesis, RNA degradation, or a combination of both must be rhythmic to drive rhythmic RNA profiles, and it is still unclear to what extent rhythmic synthesis leads to rhythmic RNA profiles. In addition, circadian RNA expression is also often tissue specific. Although a handful of genes cycle in all or most tissues, others are rhythmic only in certain tissues, even though the same core clock mechanism is believed to control the rhythmic RNA profiles in all tissues. This review focuses on the dynamics of rhythmic RNA synthesis and degradation and discusses how these steps collectively determine the rhythmicity, phase, and amplitude of RNA accumulation. In particular, we highlight a possible role of RNA degradation in driving tissue-specific RNA rhythms. By unifying findings from experimental and theoretical studies, we will provide a comprehensive overview of how rhythmic gene expression can be achieved and how each regulatory step contributes to tissue-specific circadian transcriptome output in mammals.

In adipose tissue, the expression of hundreds of genes exhibits circadian oscillation, which may or may not be affected by circulating melatonin levels. Using control and pinealectomized rats, we investigated the daily expression profile of Actb, Hprt-1, B2m, and Rpl37a, genes that are commonly used as reference genes for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), in epididymal (EP), retroperitoneal (RP), and subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissues. In control rats, Actb expression presented a daily oscillation in all adipose tissues investigated, Hprt-1 showed 24-h fluctuations in only RP and SC depots, B2m was stable over 24 h for EP and RP but oscillated over 24 h in SC adipose tissue, and Rpl37a presented a daily oscillation in only RP fat. In the absence of melatonin, the rhythmicity of Actb in all adipose depots was abolished, the daily rhythmicity of Hprt-1 and B2m was disrupted in SC fat, the peak expression of Rpl37a and Hprt-1 was delayed, and the amplitude of Rpl37a was reduced in RP adipose tissue. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the expression of putative reference genes displays a daily rhythm influenced by melatonin levels in a manner specific to the adipose depot. Thus, the proper standardization and daily profile expression of reference genes should be performed carefully in temporal studies using RT-qPCR analysis.

Emerging evidence has demonstrated that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play critical roles in the epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of mammalian circadian systems. Circadian rhythmicity regulates many aspects of our immune system, and perturbation of the circadian clock can augment the inflammatory response. However, knowledge of the precise functions of lncRNAs in the regulation of immune functions within the circadian system is relatively limited. In this study, differentially expressed lncRNAs induced by Clock knockdown were screened via mRNA/lncRNA microarray and bioinformatic prediction analysis. We identified a Clock-regulated lncRNA, AK028245, which was correlated with the activation of the immune response. The expression levels of AK028245 were decreased in the spleen of immunosuppressed mice and elevated in immune-activated mice treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Further, Clock knockdown decreased the expression of OTUD7B and A20, 2 early immune response factors acting on the NF-κB signaling pathway. Interestingly, inhibition of AK028245 increased their expression, mitigating the effects of Clock knockdown. In addition, inhibition of AK028245 downregulated the expression of tumor necrosis factor–α and interleukin-6 in the late stages of LPS stimulation and the expression of interferon-γ and Cxcl12 in the peak stages. We conclude that this newly identified lncRNA plays a role in the crosstalk between Clock and immune response regulators, likely resulting in a proinflammatory response targeting OTUD7B and A20. The lncRNA AK028245 has revealed a new mechanism of the immune response and provided new targets for the treatment of immune disorders.

ID2 is a rhythmically expressed helix–loop–helix transcriptional repressor, and its deletion results in abnormal properties of photoentrainment. By examining parametric and nonparametric models of entrainment, we have started to explore the mechanism underlying this circadian phenotype. Id2-/- mice were exposed to differing photoperiods, and the phase angle of entrainment under short days was delayed 2 h as compared with controls. When exposed to long durations of continuous light, enhanced entrainment responses were observed after a delay of the clock but not with phase advances. However, the magnitude of phase shifts was not different in Id2-/- mice tested in constant darkness using a discrete pulse of saturating light. No differences were observed in the speed of clock resetting when challenged by a series of discrete pulses interspaced by varying time intervals. A photic phase-response curve was constructed, although no genotypic differences were observed. Although phase shifts produced by discrete saturating light pulses at CT16 were similar, treatment with a subsaturating pulse revealed a ~2-fold increase in the magnitude of the Id2-/- shift. A corresponding elevation of light-induced per1 expression was observed in the Id2-/- suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). To test whether the phenotype is based on a sensitivity change at the level of the retina, pupil constriction responses were measured. No differences were observed in responses or in retinal histology, suggesting that the phenotype occurs downstream of the retina and retinal hypothalamic tract. To test whether the phenotype is due to a reduced amplitude of state variables of the clock, the expression of clock genes per1 and per2 was assessed in vivo and in SCN tissue explants. Amplitude, phase, and period length were normal in Id2-/- mice. These findings suggest that ID2 contributes to a photoregulatory mechanism at the level of the SCN central pacemaker through control of the photic induction of negative elements of the clock.

To be physiologically relevant, the period of the central circadian pacemaker, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), has to match the solar day in a process known as circadian photoentrainment. However, little is known about the spatiotemporal molecular changes that occur in the SCN in response to light. In this study, we sought to systematically characterize the circadian and light effects on activity-dependent markers of transcriptional (cFos), translational (pS6), and epigenetic (pH3) activities in the mouse SCN. To investigate circadian versus light influences on these molecular responses, we harvested brains from adult wild-type mice in darkness at different circadian times (CT) or from mice exposed to a 15-min light pulse at the middle of the subjective day (CT6, no phase shifts), early subjective night (CT14, large phase delays), or late subjective night (CT22, small phase advances). We found that cFos and pS6 exhibited rhythmic circadian expression in the SCN with distinct spatial rhythms, whereas pH3 expression was undetectable at all circadian phases. cFos rhythms were largely limited to the SCN shell, whereas pS6 rhythms encompassed the entire SCN. pH3, pS6, and cFos showed gating in response to light; however, we were surprised to find that the expression levels of these markers were not higher at phases when larger phase shifts are observed behaviorally (CT14 versus CT22). We then used animals lacking melanopsin (melanopsin knockout [MKO]), which show deficits in phase delays, to further investigate whether changes in these molecular markers correspond to behavioral phase shifts. Surprisingly, only pS6 showed deficits in MKOs at CT14. Therefore, our previous understanding of the molecular pathways that lead to circadian photoentrainment needs to be revised.

Jet lag is a circadian disruption that affects millions of people, resulting, among other things, in extreme sleepiness and memory loss. The hazardous implications of such effects are evident in situations in which focus and attention are required. Remarkably, there is a limited understanding of how jet lag recovery and associated memory loss vary year round under different photoperiods. Here we show, using different cycles representing winter, summer, and equinox in male mice, that jet lag recovery and memory vary significantly with photoperiod changes. We uncover a positive correlation of acute light effects on circadian-driven locomotion (known as negative masking) with photoentrainment speed and memory enhancement during jet lag. Specifically, we show that enhancing or reducing negative masking is correlated with better or worse memory performance, respectively. This study indicates that in addition to timed-light exposure for phase shifting, the negative masking response could also be biologically relevant when designing effective treatments of jet lag.

Artificial light exposure is associated with dyslipidemia in humans, which is a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear whether artificial light at night can exacerbate atherosclerosis. In this study, we exposed female APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice, a well-established model for human-like lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis, to either a regular light-dark cycle or to constant bright light for 14 weeks. Mice exposed to constant light demonstrated a minor reduction in food intake, without any effect on body weight, body composition, or the weight of metabolic organs. Constant light increased the plasma levels of proatherogenic non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol but did not increase the size or severity of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root. Mice exposed to constant light did show lower immune cell counts, which could explain the absence of an effect of atherosclerosis despite increased non–HDL cholesterol levels. Behavioral analysis demonstrated variability in the response of mice to the light intervention. Constant light completely blunted behavioral rhythms in some mice, while others extended their behavioral period. However, rhythm strength was not an important determinant of atherosclerosis. Altogether, these results demonstrate that constant bright light does not affect atherosclerosis in APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice. Whether artificial light exposure contributes to cardiovascular disease risk in humans remains to be investigated.

A gradual adaptation to a shifted light-dark (LD) cycle is a key element of the circadian clock system and believed to be controlled by the central circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Endocrine factors have a strong influence on the regulation of the circadian clock network and alter acute photic responses of the SCN clock. In females, endocrine function depends on the stage of the ovarian cycle. So far, however, little is known about the effect of the estrous cycle on behavioral and molecular responses to shifts in the LD rhythm. Based on this, we investigated whether estrous state affects the kinetics of phase shift during jetlag in behavior, physiology, and molecular clock rhythms in the SCN and in peripheral tissues. Female mice exposed to an advanced LD phase at proestrous or metestrous showed different phase-shift kinetics, with proestrous females displaying accelerated adaptation in behavior and physiology. Constant darkness release experiments suggest that these fast phase shifts do not reflect resetting of the SCN pacemaker. Explant experiments on SCN, adrenal gland, and uterus confirmed this finding with proestrous females showing significantly faster clock phase shifts in peripheral tissues compared with the SCN. Together, these findings provide strong evidence for an accelerated adaptation of proestrous compared with metestrous females to new LD conditions that is accompanied by rapid behavioral, physiological, and molecular rhythm resetting. Not only do these findings open up a new avenue to understand the effect of estrous cycle on the clock network under changing environmental conditions but also imply a greater susceptibility in proestrous females.

There is large interindividual variability in circadian timing, which is underestimated by mathematical models of the circadian clock. Interindividual differences in timing have traditionally been modeled by changing the intrinsic circadian period, but recent findings reveal an additional potential source of variability: large interindividual differences in light sensitivity. Using an established model of the human circadian clock with real-world light recordings, we investigated whether changes in light sensitivity parameters or intrinsic circadian period could capture variability in circadian timing between and within individuals. Healthy participants (n = 12, aged 18-26 years) underwent continuous light monitoring for 3 weeks (Actiwatch Spectrum). Salivary dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) was measured each week. Using the recorded light patterns, a sensitivity analysis for predicted DLMO times was performed, varying 3 model parameters within physiological ranges: (1) a parameter determining the steepness of the dose-response curve to light (p), (2) a parameter determining the shape of the phase-response curve to light (K), and (3) the intrinsic circadian period (tau). These parameters were then fitted to obtain optimal predictions of the three DLMO times for each individual. The sensitivity analysis showed that the range of variation in the average predicted DLMO times across participants was 0.65 h for p, 4.28 h for K, and 3.26 h for tau. The default model predicted the DLMO times with a mean absolute error of 1.02 h, whereas fitting all 3 parameters reduced the mean absolute error to 0.28 h. Fitting the parameters independently, we found mean absolute errors of 0.83 h for p, 0.53 h for K, and 0.42 h for tau. Fitting p and K together reduced the mean absolute error to 0.44 h. Light sensitivity parameters captured similar variability in phase compared with intrinsic circadian period, indicating they are viable targets for individualizing circadian phase predictions. Future prospective work is needed that uses measures of light sensitivity to validate this approach.