
Introduction
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

The authors offer an overview of their 20-year involvement in the development of an endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion. Clinical experience gained throughout 6 years of clinical evaluation are reviewed, along with observations and insights on preoperative assessment, implantation techniques, and complications.
One of the most fundamental and influential differences between conventional surgery and endovascular grafting for aortic aneurysm is the central role of imaging in every aspect of management. This review summarizes five imaging techniques for aortic endografting: intravascular ultrasound, contrast angiography, conventional computed tomography (CT), spiral CT with image processing, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
External ultrasound and intravascular ultrasound have important relevance to endovascular aortic surgery. Artifacts of arteriography include magnification, thrombus effect, foreshortening of tortuosity, loss of luminal detail, parallax error, and projection errors. Conventional CT scans have artifacts and difficulties also. Diameter measurement by CT suffers from methodology errors and observer variability. If conventional CT and angiography are used for endovascular aortic graft planning, both should be obtained since neither alone provides sufficient data.
The use of spiral CT scanning and computerized image processing has clearly aided the preoperative definition of aneurysm morphology both in terms of dimensional accuracy and by adding diagnostic information. MRA is capable of producing three-dimensional images, axial sections, and longitudinal projections in any plane. It can detect blood flow without contrast medium, but gadolinium enhances MRA by avoiding the “signal dropout” artifact.
Technology exists to provide new forms of imaging for endovascular surgery that combines three-dimensional models with on-line image data in a process called “data fusion.” This may offer improved ease and accuracy for conducting endovascular procedures in the future.
To report a > 3-year experience with a modular, balloon-expandable endovascular graft used for aneurysm exclusion in the aorta and other arteries.
The customized White-Yu Endovascular GAD Graft, a woven polyester prosthesis with an intrinsic Elgiloy wire graft attachment system along the body of the graft, is a flexible endograft design available in straight, tapered, and bifurcated versions that can be delivered transluminally through 18F to 24F sheaths.
Since July 1993, 93 patients have received the White-Yu endograft for treatment of 76 abdominal aortic, 3 thoracic aortic, 13 iliac, and 1 popliteal aneurysms. Of the 79 aortic procedures, 39 involved straight tube grafts, 20 were tapered aortoiliac models, and 20 were bifurcated devices. Success rates for tube grafts were 81% in the abdominal aorta and 100% for the thoracic aorta; 5 primary endoleaks (14%) and 2 conversions to surgery (5.6%) occurred with this graft type. Aortoiliac grafts were deployed successfully in 95% (19/20) of cases with 1 conversion (5%) due to thrombosis. Seventy-five percent of the bifurcated endograft procedures were successful, with 4 conversions (20%) for technical failures and 1 graft thrombosis. Four additional endografts were deployed to treat two primary and two secondary endoleaks in tube graft patients. Two access-related arterial injuries were treated surgically. There was one case of embolus to the distal femoral artery but no microembolization. Overall perioperative (30-day) mortality was 3.1%. Over a mean 18-month follow-up (range 2 to 39), no late graft thrombosis, stenosis, or graft migration has been seen on CT scans or X ray. Endoleak has not been detected in any aortoiliac or bifurcated graft. Aneurysm size has diminished consistently in successfully treated cases.
The White-Yu endograft appears to offer a safe, efficacious, and minimally invasive means of excluding aneurysms from the circulation. Improvements in patient selection, surgical techniques, and equipment have reduced the incidence of endoleak and conversion to open repair over the course of the evaluation.
To report the results of a two-center study of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion using a polyester-covered nitinol stent-graft.
Candidates were evaluated with arteriography and computed tomography. Criteria for endovascular therapy were a proximal aortic neck > 10 mm in length and < 25 mm in diameter, no bilateral internal iliac artery involvement in the aneurysm, no markedly tortuous common iliac arteries (CIAs) or CIAs < 7 mm in diameter, and no superior mesenteric artery occlusive disease. Patients were treated with the Mialhe Stentor and Vanguard stent-grafts in either tube or bifurcated versions.
Between August 1994 and November 1996, 149 patients (mean age 67 years, range 49 to 90) were admitted to the study. Overall primary technical success (aneurysm exclusion without endoleak) was 87% (130 patients): 78% (7 patients) for tube grafts and 88% (123 patients) for bifurcated endografts. The rate of local, remote, or systemic complications was 10.8%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 0.7%.
During an average 13.5-month follow-up, there were no late deaths. Four of 20 endoleaks sealed spontaneously, 14 were treated with endoluminal techniques, and 2 remain untreated by patient request. Three graft limb thromboses occurred; one was treated surgically, one with lytic therapy, and one was untreated. Secondary patency was 96%.
Endoluminal repair of infrarenal AAAs using straight or bifurcated grafts is a feasible alternative to conventional surgical repair. Longer follow-up and more experience with refined endograft models will elucidate the durability of this endovascular approach to treating AAAs.
To summarize the results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment using several endograft designs over a 4.5-year experience and offer comparisons on the various devices.
From May 1992 to August 1996, 121 AAA patients meeting the criteria for an endoluminal repair were treated with 1 of 5 endograft designs in three configurations. The endografts were implanted in the operating room under fluoroscopic control. Follow-up included contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 10 days of operation, 6 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter.
Endografts were successfully deployed in 106 patients (88%). Fifteen cases were converted to open repair. Six procedure-related deaths occurred within 30 days owing to myocardial infarction (3), combined renal failure and septicemia (2), and multisystem failure (1). There were 36 local/vascular complications (30%) and 18 systemic/remote complications (15%). Of the 121 patients undergoing endoluminal AAA repair, 93 (77%) are currently alive and well with their AAAs excluded from the circulation.
Trends in endoluminal AAA repair and prosthetic design point toward simpler devices and earlier treatment of smaller aneurysms once the long-term outcome of aortic endografting has been determined.
The inability to obtain or maintain a secure seal between a vessel wall and a transluminally implanted intra-aneurysmal graft is a complication unique to the evolving technique of endovascular aneurysm exclusion. Because the term “leak” has long been associated with aneurysm rupture, the term “endoleak” is proposed as a more definitive description of this phenomenon.
Embracing both persistent blood flow into the aneurysmal sac from within or around the graft (graft related) and from patent collateral arteries (nongraft related), endoleak can be classified as primary or secondary depending on the time of occurrence (within 30 days of implantation or following apparent initial seal, respectively).
Diagnostic techniques to detect endoleak include arteriography, intraprocedural pressure monitoring, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, abdominal X ray, and duplex scanning. Management strategies for endoleak range from observation with periodic imaging surveillance to correction by additional endoluminal or surgical procedures.
Standardization of the terminology describing this important sequela to endovascular aneurysm exclusion should facilitate uniform reporting of clinical trial data vital to the evaluation of this emerging technique.
To review the findings of two studies investigating the apparent differences in inflammatory responses demonstrated in patients undergoing endovascular as opposed to classic surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
The clinical course of seven patients treated with an endoluminal procedure (AAA-E) and seven patients undergoing conventional surgery (AAA-C) were compared (all men; ages 52 to 80 years). Blood samples were taken pre-, intra-, and postoperatively for up to 7 days. Inflammatory responses were assessed from measurement of interleukins (IL)-1 β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α); complement proteins C1q, C4, C5a, and terminal complement complexes, C5b-C9; and C-reactive proteins. Granulocyte and monocyte surface adhesion molecule expression was determined indirectly using a panel of monoclonal antibodies against CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, CD18, and L-selectin in donor white blood cells exposed to patient plasma.
In six of the AAA-E patients, blood pressure decreases were recorded during the introduction of the device. Elevated body temperature was sustained for 2 to 5 days postoperatively in the AAA-E group. IL-6 levels were significantly higher in AAA-C patients (p < 0.0005), while TNF-α release was recorded in the AAA-E group only. CD11b, CD11c, and CD18 molecules on both granulocytes and monocytes were significantly upregulated 60 minutes after the endovascular procedure compared to conventional surgery.
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair apparently induces a significant inflammatory response, mainly involving TNF-α release, which differs from open AAA repair. These inflammatory responses, which may be related to the observed intraprocedural blood pressure decreases, could be caused by cell activation arising from intra-aneurysmal device manipulation.
To describe a refined technique for aortomonoiliac endograft exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
A tapered aortomonoiliac graft was prepared from an 8-mm thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tube graft predilated proximally to 35 mm and tapered distally to 15 mm. The proximal graft was sutured to a 5-cm-long, predilated Palmaz stent, which was mounted on a 30-mm balloon and backloaded into a 21F packaging sheath.
With the patient under general anesthesia and both common femoral arteries exposed, the endograft was anchored in the infrarenal aorta and subsequently passed into one iliac system, where it was anastomosed to the iliac or femoral vessels. The contralateral common iliac artery was occluded, and an extra-anatomic, femorofemoral, or iliofemoral bypass grafting was performed.
Twenty of the 25 AAAs treated to date with this technique have been successful, with aneurysm exclusion achieved in 18 (2 minor distal endoleaks are scheduled for endovascular repair). The technical failures were analyzed, resulting in enhancements to the technique. Complications included 2 early (< 30 days) deaths, 1 case of minor embolization, 1 transient renal failure, 1 pulmonary embolus, and 1 wound infection. The only late complication was a graft infection localized to the groin.
Aortomonoiliac endovascular aneurysm repair is effective in patients with AAAs involving the iliac arteries. Short-term results are acceptable, but long-term efficacy must be addressed before this procedure is widely adopted. Technical changes made in response to early learning curve problems have led to a safer, more reliable procedure.
Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is an investigational technique under scrutiny around the world. The tube and bifurcated versions of the Endovascular Grafting System (EGS) developed by Endovascular Technologies are the subjects of FDA-approved multicenter trials in the United States (US). Similar studies are under way in Europe, Australia, and the United Kingdom. This review details the implantation techniques for the EGS device and summarizes the important clinical findings published through 1996.
Although the EGS was voluntarily removed from the US trial when fractures were discovered in the graft attachment system, subsequent experience with the re-engineered EGS has been positive. Successfully implanted EGS tube grafts have been associated with aneurysm shrinkage after 1 year in AAAs initially excluded or with sealed endoleaks. Aneurysm enlargement has been seen in EGS tube grafts with persistent endoleak.
To review the anatomic factors crucial to successful endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and propose an ideal endograft design for AAA exclusion.
The anatomic features of critical importance to endovascular AAA exclusion comprise remote arterial access, proximal and distal fixation sites, AAA morphology, and arterial wall pathology. When designing an aortic endograft, the major components to consider are stent selection, graft material, and the delivery system. The ideal endograft design must be sufficiently versatile to treat a broad range of patients. To meet this requirement, the endograft should display a high degree of dimensional adaptability. A modular bifurcated endograft design permits intraoperative customization to tailor the device to each patient's anatomy and pathology.
The modular stent-graft concept addresses many of the important factors in the evolution toward an ideal aortic endograft. Extensive testing will be needed to determine if the bifurcated stent-graft described here is the optimal design for effective AAA exclusion.
To detail a methodology for evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair that has been achieved through consensus of an international multidisciplinary team of investigators.
This schema features an anatomical classification for AAAs, a definition of procedural success, and a procedure for clinical assessment, as well as the necessary data collection forms. Patient data include demographics, procedural and clinical success, complications, and follow-up. Procedural details can be related to anatomic situations, comorbid processes, devices, and effective aneurysmal exclusion.
These data would allow assessment of the procedures, physician learning curves, procedural indications, techniques, methodologies, the relationship of indications to success and complications, devices and subsequent graft patency, and aneurysmal exclusion.
The use of this standardized data collection system could enable physicians and industry to better understand endovascular AAA repair and ultimately improve patient care.
