Perception

It is reasonable to ask whether observers are more sensitive to the pattern of image motion caused by forward locomotion through the environment than to the pattern caused by backward locomotion. The distribution of sensitivities of cells in MT does show such a bias, although this bias is minimal at small eccentricities. Additionally, both locomotion-induced stimulation and the sensitivities of MT cells suggest greater sensitivity should be obtained in the lower visual field.

Previous research on this issue has usually employed frontoparallel motion in patterns presented to one side of the fixation point. Both centrifugal and centripetal biases have been obtained. In this study the stimuli present motion signals that travel radially from (or towards) the fixation point. These stimuli, which produce a strong percept of motion in depth, are an adaptation of the global-dot-motion stimulus employed by Newsome and Pare. With these stimuli we find that sensitivity to motion in depth is greater in the lower visual field than in the upper visual field, and that sensitivity is greater to centripetal motion than to either centrifugal or frontoparallel motion. This centrifugal bias in sensitivity decreases with eccentricity. The last two findings contradict the notion that the bias is produced by the visual experience induced by normal forward locomotion and also that the detection of motion in depth is subserved by MT.

Data are presented from three experiments confirming an earlier finding that the stereoscopic slant perceived may be opposite to the geometrically predicted direction of slant (Gillam 1967). The stimulus for stereoscopic slant was created by imposing a disparity gradient on a frontal plane surface. Reversals are shown to occur readily for slants around a vertical axis but rarely for slant around a horizontal axis. Reversal frequency is greater for surfaces which have a regular pattern, providing good perspective information about slant. Cue conflict cannot explain reversals because adherence to perspective information predicts a perception of zero slant rather than reverse slant. A new explanation has been proposed attributing reversals to the ambiguity of horizontal disparity gradients and disambiguation of the disparity gradient by its relationship to the perspective gradient. It is shown that for any given disparity gradient there is a physical surface which would give rise to a slant reversed with respect to that normally predicted. Such a surface is eccentric in the field of view, with eccentricity given by the difference between the slants signalled by the disparity gradient and the perspective gradient. This explains why reversal responses to disparity gradients occur in the presence of perspective. It is proposed, on the basis of this analysis and the fact that reversals occur, that, like convergence and vertical disparity, perspective is a factor contributing to the correct scaling of disparity gradients in the horizontal meridian with respect to surface eccentricity.

When observers are asked to align two rectangular stimuli oriented at 45° to the visual axis there is a slight tendency to set the more distant stimulus closer to the eye than its true coplanar position. However, when a large rectangular surface is interpolated between the two oblique stimuli and the observer, errors of alignment become relatively much larger. The displacement caused by the interpolated stimulus occurs both when the display is viewed monocularly and when it is viewed binocularly. Reducing the obliquity of the rectangles results in smaller judgment errors and increasing obliquity increases errors; this is true with and without occlusion. The addition of texture elements to the surfaces of the rectangles reduces judgment errors significantly, but only under conditions of occlusion. It is possible that misalignments recorded for three-dimensional displays have something in common with the two-dimensional Poggendorff illusion.

The relationship between mean control scores and mean experimental scores in 23 experiments on alignment illusions has been examined. Evidence is presented to show that, through the operation of the range effect, control scores are biased to a significant degree in the direction of experimental scores. The implications of this are considered, not only as regards the value of control scores in psychophysical studies, but also as further evidence of the dangers of within-subjects experimental designs when issues depend upon the values of extreme points in a range of values.

Examples of the inaccessibility of mental processes by means of verbal recall are described with particular reference to the accuracy of quantitative estimates of size, distance, and duration. Evidence is presented in support of the hypothesis that nonverbal retrieval techniques are more accurate than quantitative verbal estimates. Implications for the judicial process are considered.

The ability of clumsy children aged 9 to 13 years to transfer sequential shape information between the haptic and visual modalities was examined in a matching-to-sample task. In both modalities, spatiotemporal integration of information relevant for shape was involved and transfer was examined between them by using intramodal transfer scores as covariates. The responses of clumsy children were not different from those of nonclumsy children of similar age, sex, and intelligence in the cross-modal condition involving matching of a haptic standard to a visual shape. However, when matching a visual standard to a haptic shape they were consistently both faster and less accurate. It was concluded that a specific visual-to-haptic translation process possibly involving poor visual memory for shape distinguishes clumsy children from their nonclumsy peers.

When extended outdoor scenes are imaged with magnification of 1 in optical, electronic, or computer-generated displays, scene features appear smaller and farther than in direct view. This has been shown to occur in various periscopic and camera-viewfinder displays outdoors in daylight. In four experiments it was found that apparent minification of the size of a planar object at a distance of 3–9 m indoors occurs in the viewfinder display of an SLR camera both in good light and in darkness with only the luminous object visible. The effect is robust and survives changes in the relationship between object luminance in the display and in direct view and occurs in the dark when subjects have no prior knowledge of room dimensions, object size or object distance. The results of a fifth experiment suggest that the effect is an instance of reduced visual size constancy consequent on elimination of cues for size, which include those for distance.

Eighteen experienced tree fellers and eighteen forestry students watched video recordings of mature eucalypts being felled by a man using a chain saw, and then rated whether each tree had fallen normally or abnormally. Signal-detection analysis showed that the tree fellers were more accurate than the forestry students in predicting eventual outcome. Further, the tree fellers achieved peak accuracy in discrimination by the time the logger had completed cutting the scarf (typically several minutes before the tree hit the ground), whereas the forestry students predicted outcome most accurately only when a tree was falling (and about 1 s from hitting the ground). Study of the bases for information processing and decision making by tree fellers has implications for personnel selection and training, as well as for formulation of effective work practices.

A display in which a Kanizsa-like illusory-figure pattern of three notched circles was accompanied by several other notched circles was found to be relatively ineffective, thus confirming an important, but previously untested, suggestion. This ineffectiveness may have been due to a strengthened tendency of the visual system perceptually to ‘explain’ each edge of each of the three critical notches as belonging to one of the partial circles themselves, thus tending to preclude any other (ie illusory) ‘explanation’ of those edges.

Power and Moulden (1993) have proposed a dipole model to account for the apparent movement of gratings in apertures. This includes movement orthogonal to the orientation of the grating, and the barber pole illusion: the illusion that a grating drifting diagonally across a narrow aperture appears to be moving along it. The essence of the model is that movement is signalled by a large number of dipoles, of many orientations and lengths. These dipoles respond if, and only if, one end is stimulated, and then the other. Three experiments intended to test predictions from the model are reported here. In each case a horizontal grating drifted across an aperture and subjects fixated outside the aperture. In experiment 1 subjects fixated just above or below the aperture, and reported the motion aftereffect (MAE) shown by a set of test spots. As predicted by the model, the spots further from the fixation point showed a strong MAE. Experiment 2 combined both viewing conditions of experiment 1, so that test spots above and below the fixation point were viewed simultaneously. The predictions were confirmed, since test spots further from the fixation point exhibited a stronger MAE than test spots closer to the fixation point. In experiment 3 the fixation point in all conditions was below the aperture, and, as predicted, the MAE of a spot near the bottom of the aperture was diagonally upward, although stimulation was horizontal. Again, as predicted, the MAE of a spot in the middle of the aperture appeared to move horizontally. Finally, it was predicted that a test spot at the top of the aperture would appear to move diagonally downwards, but subjects were unable to report unequivocally the direction of motion, since the MAE was occurring too far from the fovea for clear vision. Overall, then, the predictions from the model were confirmed, although there are associated phenomena the model cannot as yet account for.

Visual motion of a physically stationary stimulus can be induced by the movement of adjacent stimuli. The frequencies of motion reports and the angular separations required to induce motion were determined for a number of stimulus configurations. A stationary stimulus was fixated in the centre of the display and the point at which induced motion was initially reported was measured. In the first experiment either one or two stationary stimuli were presented in the centre of a display and either one or two similar stimuli moved horizontally towards them. The percentage of trials on which motion was induced varied with the display configuration, being greatest with two moving and one stationary stimuli. The angular separations at which motion was reported were about 2 deg for all conditions. In the second experiment the binocular interaction of such induced motion was examined. A single static fixation stimulus was presented binocularly and a range of monocular or dichoptic conditions was examined: a single moving stimulus to one eye, two moving stimuli to one eye, or two moving stimuli dichoptically. Induced motion was reported on about 90% of the trials for the monocular and dichoptic conditions with two moving stimuli. Motion was first induced at similar angular separations by two moving stimuli, whether presented monocularly or dichoptically. Binocular interaction was further examined with a display that induced motion in the stimulus presented to one eye but not in that presented to the other: this resulted in the apparent motion in depth of the binocularly fixated stimulus.

A grey disc which exhibits a vertical gradient of shading usually appears convex if lighter above and concave if lighter below. This phenomenon was investigated by Howard et al (1990) who varied both the shading axis relative to gravity and the orientation of the head. Their results indicated that head-centric or retinocentric coordinates determined the depth effect rather than gravitational axes. However, several possible problems with their study were noted, not the least of which was the possible intrusion of response rather than perceptual factors in the task they used. Here, we attempted to use an indirect measure of the perception of depth from shading: rather than asking subjects whether discs looked convex or concave, we constructed ensembles of shaded discs which, in terms of depth from shading, were or were not bilaterally symmetrical about an horizontal axis. These stimulus displays were briefly flashed to prohibit the intrusion of conscious assumptions about direction of light sources. Subjects were never asked whether any discs looked concave or convex, merely whether the set of discs was or was not depth symmetrical. Results were generally consistent with those of Howard et al and supported the conclusion that depth from shading is largely a low-level and automatic mechanism.