Perception

Above threshold, two superimposed sinusoidal gratings of the same spatial frequency (eg 1 cycle deg⁻¹) and equal contrasts, and with orientations balanced around vertical, usually look like a compound structure containing vertical and horizontal edges. However, at large plaid angles (ie large differences between component orientations) and low plaid contrasts there is a tendency for the stimulus to appear as two overlapping gratings (component structure) with obliquely oriented edges. These dependencies of perceived spatial structure in plaids are incompatible with an edge-coding scheme that uses only circular filters to compute zero-crossings, but instead support the idea that different oriented filters can (compound percept) or cannot (component percept) be combined before edges are represented. Here, further evidence is presented in support of this hypothesis. Two-component plaid stimuli had plaid angles of 45° or 90°, and a range of plaid orientations (ie a range of orientations around which the plaid components were balanced). Observers indicated whether each stimulus was perceived as a compound or component structure for a range of plaid contrasts. In addition to angle and contrast effects, perceived spatial structure was also found to depend on plaid orientation: compound structures were perceived more often when the plaid components were balanced around the cardinal axes of the retina. It is suggested that the principles governing the combination of oriented-filter outputs might be learnt during the development of the visual system by using a Hebb-type rule: coactivated filters are more likely to combine their outputs when activated on future occasions. Given the prominence of vertical and horizontal orientations in a carpentered environment, this simple rule promotes a network that combines filters balanced around cardinal axes more readily than oblique axes, in agreement with the results.

The visual angle subtended by the frame seems to be an important determinant of the contribution of orientation contrast and illusion of self-tilt (ie vection) to the rod-and-frame effect. Indeed, the visuovestibular factor (which produces vection) seems to be predominant in large displays and the contrast effect in small displays. To determine how these two phenomena are combined to account for the rod-and-frame effect, independent estimates of the magnitude of each component in relation to the angular size subtended by the display were examined. Thirty-five observers were exposed to three sets of experimental situations: body-adjustment test (illusion of self-tilt only), the tilt illusion (contrast only) and the rod-and-frame test, each display subtending 7, 12, 28, and 45 deg of visual angle. Results showed that errors recorded in the three situations increased linearly with the angular size. Whatever the size of the frame, both mechanisms, contrast effect (tilt illusion) and illusory effect on self-orientation (body-adjustment test), are always present. However, rod-and-frame errors became greater at a faster rate than the other two effects as the size of the stimuli became larger. Neither one nor the other independent phenomen, nor the combined effect could fully account for the rod-and-frame effect whatever the angular size of the apparatus.

The haptic perception of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal orientations was studied in children (aged 7 and 9 years) and in adults. The purpose was to test the hypothesis that the haptic oblique effect results from the different scanning movements at work when one hand explores an oblique standard and the other hand sets the response rod. In experiment 1, blindfolded subjects reproduced the orientation of a standard rod presented in either the frontal, the horizontal, or the sagittal plane, and this task was achieved either ipsilaterally (the same hand explored the standard and set the response rod) or contralaterally (one hand explored the standard and the other hand set the response rod). Since, in the sagittal plane, scanning movements are analogous when the left and right hands explore oblique orientations, no oblique effect should be observed in this condition if the hypothesis is valid. Moreover, a development effect should be observed, since young children generally rely more on movement coding than do older children and adults. Results did not support these predictions: the same oblique effect appeared in the frontal and the sagittal planes both in the ipsilateral and in the contralateral condition, and the effect of age was not in the direction predicted by the hypothesis. The results were consistent with the hypothesis in the horizontal plane only. Experiments 2 and 3 provided further tests of this hypothesis but both failed to support it. Taken together, the results of these three experiments did not support the assumption and it is suggested that the haptic oblique effect may be linked to the gravitational cues provided by the arm—hand system when it acts in the three spatial planes.

Design-trained subjects sorted fourteen solid forms under either visual or haptic conditions into groups on the basis of perceived similarity of balance or along a balance continuum. After these tasks of coarse and fine discrimination, each form was rated on ten bipolar stimulus attributes. Multidimensional scaling and property-fitting analyses were performed on the results of four experiments to determine the combined contribution of stimulus attributes and level of discrimination on the visual and haptic percept of balance. A balance dimension emerged for both modalities, but only when subjects were inclined to attend globally to the structure of a form by the coarse-discrimination task. Results indicate that visual balance is a holistic property of forms which derives from the synthesis of physical stimulus information. For touch, subjects appear to have equated balance with a symmetric distribution of weight/shape about the central axis of a form. Findings are related to theoretical notions of balance.

Thresholds were measured for discrimination of direction of a step angular rotation of gratings. The addition of simultaneous phase displacements (translation) had little effect on rotation thresholds for gratings over a considerable range; discrimination of rotation is unaffected by random directional translations an order of magnitude larger. Angular rotation discrimination thresholds increased with interstimulus interval (ISI). Thus discrimination is based at short ISIs (180 ms or less) on a percept of rotary motion, but at ISIs of several seconds by a spatial strategy (comparing static component orientations) relying on visual memory. Data points for the short-ISI region fell below the best-fitting straight line, and the slope of the short-ISI region of the curve was steeper than that of the long-ISI region. However, when either compound or simple gratings with uncorrelated spatial frequencies were used in the two stimulus frames, there was no evidence for a separate function at short ISIs. Orientation-change thresholds were measured for simple gratings as a function of contrast and spatial frequency. The contrast function showed saturation and the spatial frequency function was U-shaped. Rotation sensitivity for gratings is thus similar in its spatiotemporal properties to translation sensitivity. The findings support the proposal that rotation discrimination (at short ISIs) is achieved by a template mechanism combining signals from different directional detectors, rather than by cognitive comparison of the outputs of the directional mechanisms themselves.

When a pattern that would usually produce an illusory figure was altered so as to include ‘contradictory evidence’ and was presented briefly, the frequency of that illusion first increased but then decreased with increased viewing time.

In the Munker—White effect grey target bars appear lighter when they are flanked by white bars, and darker when they are flanked by black bars. It is shown that the effect is enhanced if the patterns are presented stereoscopically so that the grey bars appear either behind the grating, in which case they are seen as a rectangle that is occluded by the white bars of the grating, or in front of the grating, so that they form a transparent rectangle. These results are explained in terms of object perception: contrast enhances differences between an object and its surroundings, whereas assimilation reduces differences within an object.

For 100 years Benham's top has been a popular device demonstrating pattern-induced flicker colours (PIFCs). Results of early and recent investigations on PIFCs are reported and show that the phenomenon originates in phase-sensitive lateral interactions of modulated neural activity in the retina followed by additional spatial interactions in the visual cortex behind the locus of binocular fusion. Colour matches with normal colour stimuli indicate that S/(M + L) opponent neurons are involved. Dichromats do not find matching stimuli for all PIFCs. PIFCs may become useful in medical diagnosis. The phenomenon is interpreted as a side effect of a neural mechanism providing colour constancy under normal stimulus conditions.