The glare effect is an illusion in which a region appears self-luminous when flanked by gradients that decrease in luminance with distance from the region (Zavagno, 1999 Perception28 835–838). This region also appears brighter than a surface of the same luminance. We investigated, using the paradigm of afterimages, whether a low-level mechanism at the level of the retina or LGN could account for this apparent brighter sensation. We first replicated the result from the literature that brighter and longer-lasting physical stimuli generate longer-lasting afterimages. We then compared the glare-effect stimuli with their counterpart controls, and found that the glare-effect stimuli did not give rise to longer-lasting afterimages. This suggests that the apparent brighter sensation of the glare effect is not due to a retinal or LGN mechanism, but must have a cortical origin.
References
1.
AnstisS MRogersB JHenryJ, 1978“Interactions between simultaneous contrast and coloured afterimages”Vision Research18899–911
2.
BonatoFCataliottiJ, 2000“The effects of figure/ground, perceived area, and target saliency on the luminosity threshold”Perception & Psychophysics62341–349
3.
BonatoFGilchristA L, 1994“The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations”Perception23991–1006
4.
BonatoFGilchristA L, 1999“Perceived area and the luminosity threshold”Perception & Psychophysics61786–797
5.
BrindleyG S, 1959“The discrimination of after-images”Journal of Physiology147194–203
6.
CraikK J W, 1940“Origin of visual after-images”Nature145512
7.
De ValoisR L, 1960“Color vision mechanisms in monkey”Journal of General Physiology3115–128
8.
FeinbloomW, 1938“A quantitative study of the visual after-image”Archives of Psychology (Columbia University)23346
9.
GranitRHohenthalTUotiA, 1930“On the latency of negative after-images in relation to brightness of stimulus”Acta Ophthalmologica8137–154
10.
LeonardsUIbanezVZavagnoDSeghierMTrosciankoT, 2003“A cortical region for luminosity perception—An fMRI study”Journal of Vision3425a; http://journalofvision.Org/3/9/425 [abstract]
11.
LoomisJ, 1972“The photopigment bleaching hypothesis of complementary after-images: a psychophysical test”Vision Research121587–1594
12.
NagamataH, 1951“Contribution to the knowledge of after-images”Acta Societatis Ophthalmologicae Japonicae55802–806
13.
ShimojoSKamitaniYNishidaS, 2001“Afterimage of a perceptually filled-in surface”Science2931677–1680
14.
SvaetichinG, 1956“Spectral response curves from single cones”Acta Physiologica Scandinavica Supplementum13417–46
15.
UllmanS, 1976“On visual detection of light sources”Biological Cybernetics21205–212
16.
VirsuVLaurinenP, 1977“Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation”Vision Research17853–860
17.
ZavagnoD, 1999“Some new luminance-gradient effects”Perception28835–838
18.
ZavagnoDAnnanVCaputoG, 2004“The problem of being ‘white’: Testing the highest luminance rule”Vision16149–159
19.
ZavagnoDCaputoG, 2001“The glare effect and the perception of luminosity”Perception30209–222
20.
ZavagnoDCaputoG, 2005“Glowing greys and surface-white: The photo-geometric factors of luminosity perception”Perception34261–274
