A Unified Micromechanical Model for the Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials. Part III: Strength Behavior

Abstract

This series of papers reports a new, general, and unified micromechanical model for estimating the three-dimensional mechanical properties of a composite made from two constituent materials, i.e., continuous fiber and matrix. The linear elastic and elasto-plastic behaviors have been studied in Parts I and II respectively. The present paper investigates the tensile strength and failure mode of the composite. The tensile strength of the composite is predicted based on the ultimate stresses in the constituent phases, as the states of stresses in both phases are explicitly represented as the function of the applied overall stress field. The maximum normal stress theory for isotropic materials is incorporated with this prediction. As long as the maximum normal stress in either the fibers or the matrix attains its ultimate value, the composite is considered to fail, and the corresponding strength and failure mode are thus automatically defined. This makes determination of the composite strength as well as the failure mode extremely general, yet particularly easy. The composite can be subjected to any kind of load combination, whereas the corresponding strength behavior is determined through the same simple procedure. Comparisons between predicted and measured tensile strengths for several unidirectional composites under off-axial loads and for a plain weft-knitted fabric-reinforced composite under different uniaxial loads confirm that the present micromechanical strength theory is very efficient.

Keywords

fiber composite materials failure theories unified micromechanical model tensile strengths failure modes

References

1. Huang, Z. M. , A Unified Micromechanical Model for the Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials. Part I: Elastic Behavior, J. Thermoplastic Composite Materials, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2000, pp. 252-271.

2. Huang, Z. M. , A Unified Micromechanical Model for the Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials. Part II: Plastic Behavior, J. Thermoplastic Composite Materials, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2000, pp. 344-362.

3. Tsai, S. W. and Wu, E. M. , 1971, A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials, J. of Comp. Mater., Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 58-80.

4. Rowlands, R. E. , 1985, Strength (Failure) Theories and Their Experimental Correlation, in G. C. Sih and A. M. Skudra eds., Failure Mechanics of Composites, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 71-125.

5. Nahas, M. N. , 1986, Survey of Failure and Post-Failure Theories of Laminated Fiber-Reinforced Composites, J. Comp. Tech. & Res., Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 138-153.

6. Labossiere, P. and Neal, K. W. , 1987, Macroscopic Failure Criteria for Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials, Solid Mech. Arch., vol. 12, pp. 439-450.

7. Echaabi, J. , Trochu, F. and Gauvin, R. , 1996, Review of Failure Criteria of Fibrous Composite Materials, Polymer Composites, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 786-798.

8. Benzeggagh, M. L. , Khellil, K. and Chotard, T. , 1995, Experimental Determination of Tsai Failure Tensorial Terms Fij for Unidirectional Composite Materials, Comp. Sci. & Tech., Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 145-156.

9. Skudra, A. M. , 1985, Micromechanics of Failure of Reinforced Plastics, in G. C. Sih and A. M. Skudra eds., Failure Mechanics of Composites, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1-69.

10.

10. Pindera, M. J. , 1993, Micromechanical Aspects of Yielding and Failure Criteria of Composites, in Failure Criteria of Structured Media, J. P. Boehler ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 121-141.

11.

11. Beaumont, P. W. R. and Schultz, J. M. , 1990, Micromechanisms of Fracture in Continuous Fiber Composites—Part I: Theory, Failure Analysis of Composite Materials, P. W. R. Beaumont , J. M. Schultz , and K. Friedrich eds., Delaware Composites Design Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

12.

12. Subramanian, S. , Reifsnider, K. L. and Stinchcomb, W. W. , 1994, Micromechanics Model for the Prediction of Static Strength of Off-axis Unidirectional Laminates, Appl. Comp. Materials, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 75-79.

13.

13. Subramanian, S. , Reifsnider, K. L. and Stinchcomb, W. W. , 1995, Tensile Strength of Unidirectional Composites: The Role of Efficiency and Strength of Fiber-Matrix Interface, J. Comp. Tech. & Res., Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 289-300.

14.

14. Aboudi, J. , 1988, Micromechanical Analysis of the Strength of Unidirectional Fiber Composites, Comp. Sci. & Tech., Vol. 33, pp. 79-96.

15.

15. Cooper, G. A. , 1974, Micromechanics Aspects of Fracture and Toughness, Composite Materials, Vol. 5, Brontman and Krock , eds., Academic Press, p. 415.

16.

16. Pipes, R. B. and Cole, B. W. , 1973, On the Off-axis Strength Test for Anisotropic Materials, J. Comp. Materials, Vol. 7, pp. 246-256.

17.

17. Hashin, Z. and Rotem, A. , 1973, A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials, J. Comp. Materials, Vol. 7, pp. 448-464.

18.

18. Becker, W. , Pindera, M. I. and Herakovich, C. T. , 1987, Mechanical Response of Unidirectional Boron/Aluminium under Combined Loading, CCMS-87-06, VPI-E-87-17, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

19.

19. Ramakrishna, S. , 1997, Characterization and Modeling of Tensile Properties of Plain Knitted Fabric Reinforced Composites, Comp. Sci. & Technol., Vol. 57, pp. 1-22.