Using the Delphi Technique to Examine the Content Validity of Nursing Diagnoses

Abstract

Official labeling of phenomena that nurses diagnose and treat requires that researchers validate the existence of proposed diagnoses. One part of the validation process is the examination of content validity. The Delphi technique is a useful methodologic technique for such an examination. This article describes the characteristics, background, advantages, and disadvantages of the Delphi technique, as well as suggested strategies for using it to validate nursing diagnoses. In discussing strategies for using the Delphi technique to validate nursing diagnoses, the format, essential components, and steps of each round of the traditional and modified Delphi procedure are addressed. Round I of the traditional Delphi technique involves selection of a panel of content experts, developing and mailing questionnaires and content analysis, and generating a list of defining characteristics and operational definitions for a nursing diagnosis. Round II involves developing and mailing questionnaires, determining percentage of agreement, and providing statistical analysis. Round III includes developing and mailing questionnaires and providing statistical analysis of data. Round IV consists of developing and mailing the final report, which includes a statistical summary of individual and grouped responses in round III, as well as a minority report. The format and statistical analysis of the modified Delphi procedure is similar to rounds II, III, and IV of the traditional Delphi technique, except the modified technique usually will require only three rounds.

Keywords

content validity Delphi technique nursing diagnosis research methodology validation studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Nurses Association Commission on Nursing Research . (1976). Priorities for research in nursing. Kansas City, MO: Author.

American Nurses Association Commission on Nursing Research . (1981). Research priorities for the 1980s: Generating a scientific basis for nursing practice. Kansas City, MO: Author.

Armstrong

(1986). Computer competence for nurse educators. Image, 18, 155–160.

Churchman

(1948). Theory of experimental inference. New York: MacMillan.

Dalkey

(1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Dalkey

(1972). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. In Dalkey

(Ed.), Studies in the quality of life. Delphi and decisionmaking (p. 13). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Dalkey

Helmer

(1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458–467.

Enzer

Boucher

Lazer

(1971). Futures research as an aid to government planning in Canada: Four workshop demonstrations. Middletown, CT: Institute for the Futures.

Fehring

(1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart & Lung, 16, 625–629.

10.

Frenn

Jacobs

Lee

Sanger

Strong

(1987). Delphi survey to gain consensus on wellness and health promotion nursing diagnoses. In McLane

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 154–159). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

11.

Gershan

Jiricka

Smeykal

Freeman

Greenlee

Brukwitzi

Ross

Johnson

Balistrier

(1987). Content validation of the nursing diagnosis fluid volume deficit related to active isotonic loss. In McLane

A.M.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 229–233). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

12.

Gordon

Helmer

(1964). Report on a long range forecasting study (Publication No. [P]-2982). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

13.

Gordon

Sweeney

M.A.

(1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnosis. Advances in Nursing Science, 2(1), 1–15.

14.

Grant

Kinney

(1990). Altered level of consciousness: Validity of a nursing diagnosis. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 403–410.

15.

Helmer

Quade

(1963). An approach to the study of a developing economy by operational gaming (Publication No. 2718). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

16.

Hill

(1984) A Delphi application health care, practice, education and education administration: Circa 1992. Image, 16, 6–8.

17.

Johnson

(1989). Alteration in temperature regulation: Hypothermia. In Carroll-Johnson

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 275–283). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

18.

Jones

Twiss

(1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New York: Petrocelli Books.

19.

Judd

(1972). Forecasting to consensus gathering, Delphi grows up to college needs. College and University Business, 53, 35–38, 43.

20.

Kelly

(1989). The identification and clinical validation of the defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis alteration in tissue perfusion: cardiac. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

21.

Kim

M.J.

(1989). Nursing diagnoses. In Fitzpatrick

Taunton

Benoliel

(Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Research. New York: Springer.

22.

Lackey

(1986). Use of the Q methodology in validating defining characteristics of special nursing diagnoses. In Hurley

M.E.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 191–196). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

23.

Lackey

(1989). Use of the object content test to derive defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses. In Carroll-Johnson

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (p. 421). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

24.

Langlois

P.R.

(1987). Potential for infection related to invasive intravascular devices in the shock patient. In McLane

A.M.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (p. 277). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

25.

Lewandowski

Kositsky

(1983). Research priorities for critical care nursing: A study by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Heart & Lung, 12, 35–44.

26.

Lindeman

C.A.

(1975). Delphi survey of priorities in clinical nursing research. Nursing Research, 24, 434–441.

27.

Linstone

Turoff

(Eds.). (1977). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

28.

MacLean

(1989). Activity intolerance: Cues for diagnosis. In Carroll-Johnson

, (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 320–327). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

29.

Monograph of the invitational conference on research methods for validating nursing diagnoses. (1990). St. Louis, MO: NANDA.

30.

Notter

L.E.

(1983). Essentials of nursing research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

31.

Oberst

(1979). Priorities in cancer nursing research. Cancer Nursing, 8, 281–290.

32.

Parker

Taylor

(1980). The Delphi survey. Belmont, CA: Fearon-Pitman.

33.

Pill

(1970). The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. (Technical Memorandum No. 183). Cleveland: Operations Research Department, School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.

34.

Polit

Hungler

(1987). Nursing research: Principles and methods (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

35.

Shoemaker

(1984). Essential features of a nursing diagnosis. In Kim

M.J.

McFarland

G.K.

McLane

A.M.

(Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 104–112). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

36.

Tanner

Lindeman

(1987). Research in nursing education: Assumptions and priorities. Journal of Nursing Education, 26(2), 50–59.

37.

Tersine

Riggs

(1976). The Delphi technique: A long range planning tool. Business Horizons, 19, 51.

38.

Whitehead

(1925). Science and the modern world. New York: MacMillian.