The purpose of this study was to reduce the defining characteristics for the nursing diagnoses anxiety and fear into sets of smaller, more manageable and meaningful variables for clinical use and further investigation. A sample of 233 nurse experts rated defining characteristics of anxiety and fear on three study instruments; a sample of 69 hospitalized clients rated defining characteristics of anxiety on one study instrument. Results of principle components analyses identified patterns within defining characteristics and provided consolidation of characteristics into meaningful and usable sets.
CastlesM. (1982). Interrater agreement in the use of nursing diagnosis. In KimM.MoritzD. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 153–158). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
DoughertyC.JankinJ.LunneyM.WhitleyG. (1993). Conceptual and research-based validation of nursing diagnoses: 1950–1993. Nursing Diagnosis, 4, 156–165.
3.
FehringR. (1986). Validating diagnostic labels: Standardized methodology. In HurleyM. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 183–190). St. Louis: Mosby.
4.
FehringR. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung, 16, 625–629.
5.
FrennM.JacobsC.LeeH.SangerM.StrongK. (1987). Delphi survey to gain consensus on wellness and health promotion nursing diagnoses. In McLaneA. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 154–159). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
6.
GordonM.SweeneyM. (1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnosis. Advances in Nursing Science, 2, 1–15.
7.
GrantJ.KinneyM. (1992). Using the Delphi technique to examine the content validity of nursing diagnoses. Nursing Diagnosis, 3, 12–21.
8.
GuzzettaC.KinneyM. (1989). Magnitude estimation scaling as an instrument strategy for validating nursing diagnoses. In Carroll-JohnsonR. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 419–420). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
9.
HoskinsL. (1989). Clinical validation methodologies for nursing diagnosis research. In Carroll-JohnsonR. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 126–131). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
10.
HoskinsL. (1995). NANDA news: From the president. Nursing Diagnosis.6, 53–54.
11.
JonesP. (1982). The revision of nursing diagnosis terms. In KimM.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 285–290). St Louis: Mosby.
12.
JonesP.JacobD. (1984). Anxiety revisited: From a nursing perspective. In KimM.McFarlaneC.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 285–290). St. Louis: Mosby.
13.
KimM.AmorosoR.GulanickM.MoyerK.ParsonsE.ScherbelJ.StaffordM.SuhaydaR.YocumC. (1982). Clinical use of nursing diagnosis in cardiovascular nursing. In KimM.MoritzD. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 184–190). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
KimM.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), (1984). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (p. 472). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
15.
KinneyM.GuzzettaC. (1989). Testing a measuring technique to study nursing diagnosis. In Carroll-JohnsonR. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (p. 419). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
16.
LevinR.KrainovichB.BahrenburgE.MitchellC. (1989). Diagnostic content validity of nursing diagnosis. Image21, 40–44.
17.
MatsukiM.OtaniE. (April, 1994). Diagnostic content validation for anxiety, hopelessness, and ineffective airway clearance in ICU in JapanPoster presented at the Eleventh Conference of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, Nashville, TN.
18.
McKeehanK.GordonM. (1982). Utilization of accepted diagnoses. In KimM.MoritzD. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 190–196). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
MetzgerK.HiltunenE. (1987). Diagnostic validity of ten frequently reported nursing diagnoses. In McClaneA. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh national conference (pp. 144–153). St. Louis: Mosby.
20.
McLaughlinF.MarascuiloL. (1990). Advanced nursing and health care research: Quantification approaches (pp. 254–264). Philadelphia: Saunders.
21.
PolitD.HunglerB. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods (5th ed., pp. 464–467). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
22.
SchroederP. (1989) Tool development: Validity related to nursing diagnosis, Monograph of the invitational conference on research methods for validating nursing diagnoses (pp. 147–165). Philadelphia: NANDA.
23.
ShoemakerJ. (1984). Essential features of a nursing diagnosis. In KimM.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 104–112). St. Louis: Mosby.
24.
SgroiS.HollandJ.SolkoffN. (1970). Development of an anxiety-depression scale for use with medically ill patients. Buffalo, NY: Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, State University of New York.
25.
Steering committee on databases discusses information projects. (1995). The American Nurse, p. 27.
26.
Taylor-LoughranA.OBrienM.LaChapelleR.RangelS. (1989). Defining characteristics of the nursing diagnoses fear and anxiety: A validation study. Applied Nursing Research, 2, 178–186.
27.
WalkerL.AvantK. (1988). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (2nd ed., pp. 35–51). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
28.
WhitleyG. (1992a). Concept analysis of anxiety. Nursing Diagnosis, 3, 107–116.
29.
WhitleyG. (1992b). Concept analysis of fear. Nursing Diagnosis, 3, 155–161.
30.
WhitleyG. (1994). Expect validation and differentiation of the nursing diagnoses anxiety and fear. Nursing Diagnosis, 5, 143–150.
