Department of the
Solicitor General, Canada (1973) News
release, October 24.
2.
EvjenV. H. (1962), “Current thinking
on parole prediction tables.” Crime and
Delinquency, 8:
215–238.
3.
GlaserD. (1955), “The efficacy of
alternative approaches to parole prediction.”
American Sociological Review, 20:
283–287.
4.
GlaserD. (1962), “Prediction
tables as accounting devices for judges and parole
boards.” Crime and Delinquency,
8:
239–258.
5.
GlaserD.O'LearyV. (1963), Personal Characteristics and Parole
Outcome, United States Department of Health Education and
Welfare.
6.
HaynerN. S. (1958), “Why do parole
boards lag in the use of prediction scores?”
{trPacific Sociological Review}, 1:
73–76.
7.
HughesR. J. (1973), “American Bar
Association's Parole Volunteer Program.”
American Journal of Correction, 35:
20–21 and 25.
8.
InciardiJ.BabstD. V.KovalM. (1973), “Computing Mean
Cost Ratings (MCR).” Journal of Research
in Crime and Delinquency, 10:
22–28.
9.
MannheimH.WilkinsL. T. (1955), Prediction Methods in Relation to
Borstal Training, H.M.S.O.,
London.
10.
NormandeauA. (1970), “A Crime Index
for England and 10 Other Countries.”
Criminologist, 5:
63–71.
11.
O'LearyV.NuffieldJ. (1972), “Parole Decision
Making Characteristics: Report of a National
Survey.” Criminal Law Bulletin,
8:
651–680.
12.
President's Commission
on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice
(1967), Task Force Report on Corrections,
U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.
13.
SimonF. H. (1971), Prediction Methods in
Criminology, H.M.S.O.,
London.
14.
Social Welfare
Department, Victoria (1963), A Follow Up Study
of Parole. A. D. Green, Research and Statistics
Division.
15.
Social Welfare
Department, Victoria (1964), A Follow Up Study
of Parole and Criminality Patterns for Parolees Released in the Year
1958/59. F. Pavlin, Research and Statistics
Division.
16.
Social Welfare
Department, Victoria (1965), A Follow Up Study
of Parole, for Parolees Released in the Year 1959/60. P.
Penry-Williams, Research and Statistics Division.
17.
WardP. G. (1968), “The comparative
efficiency of differing techniques of prediction
scaling.” Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Criminology, 1:
109–112.
