The authors review three theoretical approaches to strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR), which can be defined as voluntary CSR actions that enhance a firm’s competitiveness and reputation. The end result of such activities should be an improvement in financial and economic performance. Based on an overview of recent empirical evidence, the authors conclude that economic theories of strategic CSR have the greatest potential for advancing this field of inquiry, although theories of strategic leadership should also be incorporated into this perspective. In the remainder of the article, they provide focused summaries of the articles presented in this special issue and outline an agenda for future research on strategic CSR and environmental sustainability.
Abrahamson, E. ( 1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254-285.
2.
Adair, R.K. ( 1982). A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci’s peer-review study. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 196.
3.
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. ( 2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 45-62.
4.
Arrow, K.J. ( 1973). Social responsibility and economic efficiency. Public Policy, 21, 303-317.
5.
Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., & May, D.R. ( 2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
6.
Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A., & Heiner, K. ( 2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292-318.
7.
Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. ( 2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 419-445.
8.
Banerjee, S. ( 2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
9.
Barnett, M.L. ( 2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794-816.
10.
Barnett, M.L., & Salomon, R.M. ( 2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1101-1122.
11.
Barney, J. ( 1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 771-792.
12.
Baron, D.P. ( 2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy , 10, 7-45.
13.
Beckerman, W. ( 1994). Sustainable development-Is it a useful concept? Environmental Values, 3, 191-209.
14.
Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. ( 2007). Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1645-1663.
15.
Beyer, J.M. ( 1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 68-88.
16.
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. ( 2003). Strategy and human resource management. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
Brown, J.R. ( 2001). Who rules in science? An opinionated guide to the wars . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Camerer, C.F. ( 1985). Redirecting research in business policy and strategy . Strategic Management Journal, 6, 1-15.
19.
Cannella, A.A., Jr. , & Paetzold, R.L. (1994). Pfeffer’s barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19, 331-341.
20.
Carmeli, A., Gilat, A., & Waldman, D.A. ( 2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 972-992.
21.
Carroll, A.B. ( 1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-506.
22.
Carroll, A.B. ( 1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
23.
A change in climate: The greening of corporate responsibility. ( 2008, January 17). The Economist (Online ed.). Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/10491154?story_id=10491154
24.
Chatterji, A.K., & Levine, D. ( 2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29-51.
25.
Chatterji, A.K., Levine, D., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169.
26.
Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford University handbook of CSR. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Crouch, C. ( 2006). Modelling the firm in its market and organizational environment: Methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27, 1533-1551.
28.
DesJardins, J.R. ( 2007). Business, ethics, and the environment: Imagining a sustainable future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
29.
DiMaggio, P.J. ( 1997). Culture and cognition. In J. Hagan & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Annual review of sociology (Vol. 23, pp. 263-287). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
30.
Donaldson, L. ( 1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. ( 1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
32.
Edwards, J.R. ( 2003). Construct validation in organizational behavior research . In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 327-371). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
33.
Entine, J. ( 2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practices and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16, 352-368.
34.
Flynn, F.J., & Staw, B.M. ( 2004). Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 309-330.
Friedman, M. ( 1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.
37.
Gans, J.S., & Shepherd, G.B. (1994). How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 165-179.
38.
Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., & Krause, T.-S. ( 1995). Shifting paradigms for unsustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
39.
Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. ( 2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society , 39, 254-280.
40.
Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. ( 1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5-31.
41.
Hart, S.L. ( 1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.
42.
Harter, J., Schmidt, F.L., & Hayes, T.L. ( 2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
43.
Hedges, L.V. ( 1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist , 42, 443-455.
44.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. ( 1980). Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359-369.
45.
Hosmer, L.T. ( 1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379-403.
46.
Hunt, M. ( 1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
47.
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. ( 1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Husted, B.W., & Salazar, J.D.J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75-91.
49.
Jensen, M.C. ( 2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235-256.
50.
Jones, T.M. ( 1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
51.
King, A. ( 2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review , 32, 889-900.
52.
Kotchen, M. ( 2006). Green markets and private provision of public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 816-834.
53.
Levitt, T. ( 1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 38-44.
54.
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. ( 2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115-136.
55.
Lodahl, J.B., & Gordon, G. ( 1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57-72.
56.
Macher, J.T., & Richman, B.D. ( 2008). Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Business and Politics, 10(1), 1-63.
57.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. ( 2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817-835.
58.
Marcus, A.A., & Fremeth, A.R. ( 2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26.
59.
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. ( 2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60.
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. ( 2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
61.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. ( 2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. Academy of Management Review , 33, 404-424.
62.
McKinley, W. ( 1996). What’s hot and what’s not. Academy of Management Review, 21, 614-616.
63.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. ( 2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal , 21, 603-609.
64.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. ( 2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
65.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. ( 2002). Additional reflections on the strategic implications of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 15-16.
66.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Teoh, S.H. ( 1999). Issues in the use of event study methodology: A critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 340-365.
67.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, P.M. ( 2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications . Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
68.
McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D.D., & Cory, K.D. ( 2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707-724.
69.
Mone, M.A., & McKinley, W. ( 1993). The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 284-296.
70.
Moon, J., & Vogel, D. ( 2008). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten , J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 303-323). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71.
Nordhaus, W.D. ( 2008). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
72.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
73.
Orlitzky, M. ( 2001). Does organizational size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 167-180.
74.
Orlitzky, M. ( 2006). Links between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Theoretical and empirical determinants. In J. Allouche (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility , Vol. 2: Performances and stakeholders (Vol. 2, pp. 41-64). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
75.
Orlitzky, M. ( 2008). Corporate social performance and financial performance: A research synthesis. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten , J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 113-134). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76.
Orlitzky, M. (in press). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance . Business Ethics Quarterly.
77.
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J.D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society , 40, 369-396.
78.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. ( 2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis . Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
79.
Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D.L. ( 2008). Toward integrative corporate citizenship: Research advances in corporate social performance. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
80.
Orlitzky, M., & Whelan, G. ( 2007). On the effectiveness of social and environmental accounting . Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1, 311-333.
81.
Perrow, C. ( 1994). Pfeffer slips. Academy of Management Review, 19, 191-194.
82.
Peters, D.P., & Ceci, S. ( 1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-195.
83.
Pfeffer, J. ( 1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
84.
Pfeffer, J. ( 1995). Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science, 6, 681-686.
85.
Pfeffer, J., Leong, A., & Strehl, K. ( 1977). Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces, 55, 938-951.
86.
Piga, C. ( 2002). "Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective." A few comments and some suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 27, 13-15.
87.
Quelch, J., & Jocz, K.E. ( 2009). Executive Forum: Can corporate social responsibility survive recession?Leader to Leader, 53, 37-43.
88.
Reinhardt, F.L. ( 1999). Bringing the environment down to earth. Harvard Business Review, 77, 149-157.
89.
Schmidt, F.L. ( 1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist , 47, 1173-1181.
90.
Schwab, D.P. ( 1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3-43). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
91.
Siegel, D.S. ( 2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/ strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5-16.
92.
Siegel, D., & Vitaliano, D. ( 2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17, 773-792.
93.
Stern, N. ( 2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. London, UK: HM Treasury Cabinet Office.
94.
Steverman, B. ( 2010). BPdisaster vexes socially responsible investors [Electronic version]. Bloomberg Businessweek (Online ed.). Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jun2010/pi2010062_229025.htm
95.
Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N.T., Waldman, D.A., & House, R.J. ( 2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 626-654.
96.
Swanson, D.L. ( 1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64.
97.
Thornton, P.H. ( 2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81-101.
98.
Turban, D.B. ( 2001). Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campuses: An examination of the applicant population. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 293-312.
99.
Turban, D.B., Forret, M.L., & Hendrickson, C.L. (1998). Applicant attraction to firms: Influences of organization reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 24-44.
100.
Turban, D.B., & Greening, D.W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
101.
Ullmann, A. ( 1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540-577.
102.
Van Maanen, J. ( 1995a). Style as theory. Organization Science , 6(1), 133-143.
103.
Van Maanen, J. ( 1995b). Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science, 6, 687-692.
104.
Van Oosterhout, J., & Heugens, P.P.M. A. R. (2008). Much ado about nothing: A conceptual critique of corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams , D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 197-223). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
105.
Vogel, D. ( 2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
106.
Waldman, D.A., & Siegel, D. ( 2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 117-131.
107.
Waldman, D., Siegel, D.S., & Javidan, M. ( 2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1703-1725.
108.
Walsh, J.P. ( 2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management . Academy of Management Review, 30, 426-438.
109.
Welch, J., & Welch, S. ( 2009, May 20). Corporate social responsibility in a recession [Electronic version]. Bloomberg Business Week (Online ed.). Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_22/b4133000801325.htm
110.
Windsor, D. ( 2001). "Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective"- Some comments. Academy of Management Review , 26, 502-504.
111.
Wood, D.J., & Jones, R.E. ( 1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
