This study compares task outcome and various dialogue parameters between situations in which task participants either could or could not see each other. The results establish that the visibility of one's conversational partner improves information transfer and the management of turn taking in a transactional problem solving task. The greater efficiency of the dialogues between participants who could see each other was attributed to the exchange of visually transmitted, non-verbal signals. attempting to compensate for the lack of this additional channel of communication, pairs of subjects who could not see each other demonstrated flexibility and versatility in communicating. They interrupted their partners more frequently and used more back channel responses to provide their partners with increased verbal feedback. The analysis of one specific non-verbal behaviour, gaze, for a subsample of the dialogues, suggested that gaze plays a role in aiding communication.
ANDERSON, A. H., BADER, M., BARD, E. G., BOYLE, E., DOHERTY, G., GARROD, S., ISARD, S., KOWTKO, J., McALLISTER, J., MILLER, J., SOTILLO, C., THOMPSON, H., and WEINART, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech, 34, 351–366.
2.
ANDERSON, A., CLARK, A., and MULLIN, J. (1991). Introducing information in dialogues: How young speakers refer and how young listeners respond. Journal of Child Language, 18, 663–687.
3.
ARGYLE M. (1984). The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. London: Penguin Books.
4.
ARGYLE, M., and COOK, M. (1976). Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ARGYLE, M., and COOK, M. (1977). Gaze and mutual gaze in social encounters. American Scientist, 65, 328–333.
6.
ARGYLE, M., and DEAN, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
7.
ARGYLE, M., and INGHAM, R. (1972). Gaze, mutual gaze and distance. Semiotica, 6, 32–49.
8.
ARGYLE, M., LALLJEE, M., and COOK M. (1968). The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations, 21, 3–17.
9.
AUSTIN, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
BEATTIE, G. W. (1978). Floor apportionment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 7–16.
11.
BEATTIE, G. W. (1980). The role of language production processes in the organisation of behaviour in face-to-face interaction. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production (Vol. 1) (pp. 69–107). London: Academic Press.
12.
BEATTIE, G. W. (1981). The regulation of speaker turns in face-to-face conversation: Some implications for conversation in sound-only channels. Semiotica, 34, 55–70.
13.
BEATTIE, G. W., and BARNARD, P. J. (1979). The temporal structure of natural telephone conversations (directory enquiry calls). Linguistics, 17, 213–230.
14.
BENNETT, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4, 171–188.
15.
BIRDWHISTELL, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
BROWN, G., ANDERSON, A. H., YULE, G., and SHILLCOCK, R. (1984). Teaching Talk. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BROWN, G., and YULE, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BUTTERWORTH, B., HINE, R. R., and BRADY, K. D. (1977). Speech and interaction in sound- only communication channels. Semiotica, 20, 81–99.
19.
CHAPANIS, A. (1971). Prelude to 2001: Explorations in human communication. American Psychologist, 26, 949–961.
20.
CHAPANIS, A. (1986). Interactive human communication. In I. Grief (Ed.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings (pp. 127–140). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc..
21.
CHAPANIS, A., OCHSMAN, R. B., PARRISH, R. N., and WEEKS, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: 1. The effects of four communication modes on the behaviour of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 14, 487509.
22.
CHAPANIS, A., and OVERBEY, C. M. (1974). Studies in interactive communication: 3. Effects of similar and dissimilar communication channels and two interchange options on team problem solving. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 343–374.
23.
CLARK, H. H., and BRENNAN, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
24.
CLARK, H. H., and SCHAEFER, E. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 19–41.
25.
CLARK, H. H., and SCHAEFER, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
26.
CLARK, H. H., and WILKES-GIBBS, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
27.
COOK, M., and LALLJEE, M. (1972). Verbal substitutes for visual signals in interaction. Semiotica, 6, 212–221.
28.
CUTLER. A., and PEARSON, M. (1986). On the analysis of prosodic turn taking cues. In C. Johns-Lewis (Ed.), Intonation in Discourse (pp. 139–155). London: Croom Helm.
29.
DABBS, J.M. (1985). Temporal patterns of speech and gaze in social and intellectual conversation. In H. Giles and R. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent Advances in Language, Communication and Social Psychology (pp. 182–198). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
DITTMAN, A. T. (1972). The body movement/speech rhythm relationship as a cue to speech encoding. In A. W. Siegman and B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in Dyadic Communication ( pp. 135–151). New York: Pergamon.
31.
DITTMAN., A. T., and LLEWELLYN, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 79–84.
32.
DUNCAN, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283–292.
33.
DUNCAN, S. (1973). Towards a dyadic grammar for conversation. Semiotica, 1, 29–47.
34.
DUNCAN, S., and FISKE, D. W. (1977). Face-to-Face Interaction: Research Methods and Theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
EDELSKY, C. (1981). Who's got the floor?Language in Society, 10, 383–421.
36.
ELLIS, A., and BEATTIE, G. (1986). The Psychology of Language and Communication. Hills-dale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
EXLINE, R. V., and WINTERS, L. C. (1965). Affective relations and mutual glances in dyads. In S. S. Tomkins and C. E. Izard (Eds.), Affect, Cognition and Personality (pp. 319–350). New York: Springer.
38.
FERGUSON, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295–302.
39.
GALE, S. (1990). Human aspects of interactive multimedia communication. Interacting with Computers, 2, 175–189.
40.
GOODWIN, C. (1981). Conversational Organisation: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
41.
GRAHAM, J. A., and HEYWOOD, S. (1975). The effects of elimination of hand gesture and of verbal codability on speech performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 189–195.
42.
JAFFE, J., and FELDSTEIN, S. (1970). Rhythms of Dialogue. New York: Academic Press
43.
JEFFERSON, G. A. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–9
44.
KASL, S. V., and MAHL G.F. (1965). The relationship of disturbance and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 425–433.
45.
KENDON, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.
46.
KLEINKE, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.
47.
KLEINKE, C. L., STANESKI, R. A., and BERGER, D. E. (1975). Evaluation of an interviewer as a function of interviewer gaze, reinforcement of subject gaze and interviewer attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 7–12.
48.
KRAUSS, R. H., and GLUCKSBERG, S. (1969). The development of communication. Child Development, 40, 255–266.
49.
McLAUGHLIN, M. L. (1984). Conversation: How Talk is Organised. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
50.
MISHLER, E. G., and WAXLER, N. E. (1968). Interaction in Families. An Experimental Study of Family Processes and Schizophrenia. New York: Wiley.
51.
O'CONNELL, D. C., KOWAL, S., and KALTENBACHER, E. (1990). Turn-taking: A critical analysis of the research tradition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 345–373.
52.
ORESTROM, B. (1983). Turn-taking in English Conversation. Lund, Sweden: Liber.
53.
POWER, R. (1979). The organization of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics, 17, 107–152.
54.
ROGER, D. (1989). Experimental studies of dyadic turn taking behaviour. In D. Roger and P. Bull, (Eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 75–95). Clevedon, U.K. :Multilingual Matters Ltd.
55.
ROSENFELD, H. M. (1987). Conversational control functions of nonverbal behaviour. In A. Siegman and S. Feldstein (Eds.), Non-verbal Behavior and Communication (pp. 563–601). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
56.
RUSSO, N. F. (1975). Eye contact, interpersonal distance and the equilibrium theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 497–502.
57.
RUTTER, D. R., and STEVENSON, G. M. (1977). The role of visual communication in synchronising conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 29–37.
58.
RUTTER, D. R., and STEVENSON, G. M. (1979). The functions of looking: Effects of friendship on gaze. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 38, 203–205.
59.
RUTTER, D. R., STEVENSON, G. M., AYLING K., and WHITE, P. A. (1978). The timing of looks in dyadic conversation. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 17–21.
60.
SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E. A., and JEFFERSON, G. A. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
61.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A., and SACKS, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
62.
SCHOBER, M., and CLARK, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232.
63.
SEARLE, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SHORT, J. A. (1974). Effects of medium of communication on experimental negotiation. Human Relations, 27, 225–234.
65.
SINCLAIR, J. M., and COULTHARD, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. The English used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
66.
WEEKS, G. D., and CHAPANIS, A. (1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem solving in three telecommunication modes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 487–917.
67.
WILKES-GIBBS, D., and CLARK, H.H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 183–194.
68.
WILLIAMS, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963–976.
69.
YNGVE, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Linguistics Department.
