This study investigates differences among four decision-making groups and describes the patterns of communication unique to two groups. In the first part of the investigation, four decision-making groups are given either competitive or cooperative inducements and are compared on two measures: competition and satisfaction. The two groups given the competitive inducement (Groups I and III) were found to have significantly higher competition and lower satisfaction than the groups given cooperative inducements (Groups II and IV). In the second part of the study a lag sequential analysis is conducted on the coded communicative sequences in the highest and lowest competition groups (I and II, respectively). This analysis yields patterns to decision-making unique to each sample group. Group I's communication is characterized by highly probable (above-chance) sequences of disagreement messages and few probable agreement messages. Group II's communication patterns consist of highly probable sequences of decision development and probable agreement/support messages throughout the group interaction.
References
1.
AndersonL.AgerJ. (1978) “Analysis of variance in small group research.” Personality and Social Psychology Bull.4: 341–345.
2.
BackK. (1951) “Influence through social communication.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology46: 9–23.
3.
BakemanR. (1978) Untangling streams of behavior: sequential analyses of observation data, in SackettG. (ed.) Observing Behavior Volume II: Data Collection and Analysis Methods. Baltimore: University Park Press.
4.
BakemanR. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
BalesR. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BalesR.StrodtbeckF. (1951) “Phases in group problem-solving.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology46: 485–495.
7.
BerkowitzL. (1957) “Effects of perceived dependency relationships upon conformity to group expectations.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology55: 350–354.
8.
BochnerA. (1978) Forming warm ideas. Presented at the Asilomar conference, Asilomar.
9.
BorgottaE. (1963) “Some task factors in social interaction.” Sociology and Social Research48: 5–12.
10.
Bozivich.H.BancroftT.HartleyH. (1956) “Power of analysis of variance test procedures for certain incompletely specified models.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics69: 439–440.
11.
CrowellL.ScheidelT. (1961) “Categories for analysis of idea development in discussion groups.” J. of Social Psychology54: 155–168.
12.
DeutschM. (1973) The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DeutschM. (1969a) “Conflicts: productive and destructive.” J. of Social Issues25: 7–41.
14.
DeutschM. (1969b) “Socially relevant science: reflections on some studies of interpersonal conflict.” Amer. Psychologist24: 1076–1092.
15.
DeutschM. (1962) “Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes.” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation10: 275–319.
16.
DeutschM. (1949) “An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process.” Human Relations2: 199–231.
17.
DruckmanD. (1971) “The influence of the situation in interparty conflict.” J. of Conflict Resolution00: 523–554.
18.
EllisD.FisherB.A. (1975) “Phases of conflict in group development.” Human Communication Research1: 195–212.
19.
FisherB.A. (1974) Small Group Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
FisherB.A. (1970) “Decision emergence: phases in group decision-making.” Speech Monographs37: 53–66.
21.
FisherB.A.DreckselG.WerbelW. (1977) “Social information processing analysis.” Unpublished coding manual.
22.
GerardH. (1953) “The effect of different dimensions of disagreement on the communication process in small groups.” Human Relations7: 313–325.
23.
GottheilE. (1955) “Changes in social perception contingent upon competing or cooperating.” Sociometry18: 132–137.
24.
GottmanJ. (1979) Marital Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
25.
GottmanJ.MarkmanH.NotariusC. (1977) “The topography of marital conflict: a sequential analysis of verbal behavior.” J. of Marriage and the Family00: 461–478.
26.
GrossackM. (1954) “Some effects of cooperation and competition on small group behavior.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology49: 341–348.
27.
GuetzkowH. (1950) “Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data.” J. of Clinical Psychology6: 47–58.
28.
GurmanE.BassB. (1961) “Objective compared with subjective measures of the same behavior in groups.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology63: 368–374.
29.
HawesL.FoleyJ. (1976) Group decisioning: testing a finite stochastic model, in MillerG. (ed.) Explorations in Interpersonal Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
KelleyH.ThibautJ. (1954) Experimental studies of group problem solving and process, in LindzeyG. (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31.
KirkpatrickS. [ed.] (1976) Political decision-making: interdisciplinary developments from a microanalytic perspective. Amer. Behavioral Scientist20.
32.
KirkpatrickS. [ed.] DavisD.RobertsonR. (1976) “The process of political decision-making in groups: search behavior and choice shifts.” Amer. Behavioral Scientist20: 33–64.
33.
KruegerD.L. (1979) “A stochastic analysis of communication development in self-analytic groups.” Human Communication Research5: 314–324.
34.
LevyS. (1953) “Experimental study of group norms: the effects of group co-hesiveness upon social conformity.” Ph.D. dissertation. New York University.
35.
MintzA. (1951) “Non-adaptive group behavior.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology46: 150–159.
36.
MizuharaT.TamariS. (1952) “Experimental studies of cooperation and competition.” Japanese J. of Psychology22: 124–127.
37.
MortensenC.D. (1970) “The status of small group research.” Q. J. of Speech00: 304–309.
38.
NunnallyJ. (1967) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
RavenB.EachusH. (1963) “Cooperation and competition in means-interdependent triads.” J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology67: 307–316.
40.
RogersL E.FaraceR. (1975) “Analysis of relationship communication . in dyads: new measurement procedures.” Human Communication Research1: 222–239.
41.
RubinJ.BrownB. (1975) The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
42.
SackettG. (1979) The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research, in OsofskyJ. (ed.) Handbook of Infant Development. New York: John Wiley.
43.
SackettG. (1978) “The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research.” Unpublished manuscript.
44.
ScheidelT.CrowellL. (1964) “Idea development in small discussion groups.” Q. J. of Speech50: 140–145.
45.
StechE. (1979) “A grammar of conversation with a quantitative empirical test.” Human Communication Research5: 158–170.
46.
SteinfattT.MillerG. (1974) Communication in game theoretic models of conflict, in MillerG.SimonsH. (eds.) Perspectives on Communication in Social Conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47.
SwinthR.TuggleF. (1971) “A complete dyadic process model of four-man group problem-solving.” Org. Behavior and Human Performance6: 517–549.
48.
ThomasE. (1957) “Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioning.” Human Relations10: 347–366.
49.
TuckmanB. (1965) “Developmental sequence in small groups.” Psych. Bull.63: 384–399.
50.
WeissR.HopsH.PattersonG. (1973) A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict: a technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it, in HammerlynckL.HandyL.MarshE. (eds.) Behavior Change: The Fourth Banff Conference on Behavior Modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
