Examining the validity of self-report: middle-level singers’ ability to predict and assess their sight-singing skills

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine choral students’ ability to predict and evaluate their sight-singing skills. Participants were asked to assign a rating based on how well they predicted they would sight-sing five musical examples. Following the singing of each example, participants were asked to evaluate their sight-singing performances using the same rating scale. Two middle-level choral directors were asked to evaluate the participants’ performances using an evaluation form designed to parallel the subject’s prediction and evaluation questionnaires. Findings indicate that students were reasonably accurate at predicting their sight-singing performance; however, they were more accurate at evaluating their performance. Older students were generally more able to predict and assess their sight-singing performances, as were students who had participated in a musical ensemble. The data suggest that the dependability and usefulness of student self-report is promising and should be further examined by music educators.

Keywords

choral middle school music evaluation predictive validity

References

Agee, D. (1991). Double-barrelled assessment: Teachers and students as partners . Adult Learning, 2(7), 7-9 .

Andersen, H. O. (1972). The supervisor as a facilitator of self-evaluation . School Science and Mathematics, 7, 603-616 .

Combs, A. W. (1979). Myths in education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon .

Daniels, R. D. (1988). Sight-reading instruction in the choral rehearsal . Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 6(2), 22-24 .

Darrow, A. A. , Johnson, C. M. , Miller, A. , & Williamson, P. (2002). Can students accurately assess themselves?: Predictive validity of student self report . Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 8-11 .

Demorest, S. M. (1998). Sightsinging in the secondary choral ensemble: A review of the research . Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 137, 1-15 .

Diez, M. E. (1997). Assessment as a lever in educational reform . National Forum, 77(1), 27-30 .

Hales, B. (1961). A study of music reading programs in high school choruses in the Rocky Mountain states. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene. Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 2416.

Hartman, C. L. (1978). A longitudinal look at self-appraisal strategies . Journal of Teacher Education, 29(5), 11-12 .

10.

Henry, M. , & Demorest, S. M. (1994). Individual sight-singing achievement in successful choral ensembles: A preliminary study . Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13(1), 4-8 .

11.

Johnson, G. J. B. (1987). A descriptive study of the pitch-reading methods and the amount of time utilized to teach sight-singing by high school choral teachers in the north central region of the American Choral Directors Association. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

12.

Kusnic, E. , & Finley, M. L. (1993). Student self-evaluation: An introduction and rationale . New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 56, 5-13 .

13.

Lohmann, K. T. , & Marsh, K. R. (1998). A comparison of junior high choral students’ self-perception of sight-singing ability to actual sight-singing test results. Unpublished undergraduate research paper, University of Kansas, Lawrence .

14.

Music Educators National Conference (1994). National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: MENC .

15.

Rodgers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin .

16.

Szabo, C. E. (1992). A profile of ten high school choral directors and their activities during one week. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, OH, Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 2730A.