Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Simulation-based learning is frequently used for medical education and skills training, especially in areas where complex teamwork is required, such as the management of patients with extracorporeal support.1,2 The aim of such learning is to recreate specific clinical situations in a controlled environment where candidates can rehearse their responses without any negative consequences related to human error. 3 The Educational Corner, an area dedicated to active learning and training, has been an integral part of the EuroELSO annual congress since the first meeting in Rome during 2012. It provides an opportunity for delegates who want to improve their extracorporeal life support (ECLS) knowledge during the congress to learn about dedicated topics and expand to new teaching topics. All of the workshops of the 8th edition of the EuroELSO congress have been fully sold out, highlighting the high demand and interest among ECLS users. Experienced trainers deliver repeated dedicated sessions on fundamental aspects of ECLS management. The Educational Corner was originally conceived to deliver education, training and hands-on facilities taking advantage of the congress participation and instituted to provide the registered attendees with a near-authentic, almost one-to-one training and enhanced learning experience through the use of simulations focusing on the acquisition of both technical and behavioural skills.4–7
This publication should help to offer training, carry out feedback, debriefing and continuously development. 8 The article is aimed towards responsible ECLS programme directors, coordinators and all healthcare professionals (e.g. physicians, ECLS specialists, perfusionists, nurses, respiratory therapists) involved in ECLS training. The active learning can be turned into effective improvements in the workplace and into beneficial changes in the methods for cannulating and managing patients on ECLS.4–6
Methods
Access to the simulation sessions of the Educational Corner was only possible for delegates of the 8th EuroELSO Congress held in 2019 in Barcelona. To continuously improve the quality of the simulations provided to the delegates and to expand on new teaching topics, the learning experiences of all attendees during the 8th edition of the EuroELSO Congress were evaluated. The topics for the simulations were advertised in advance on the EuroELSO website with outlined learning objectives, allowing the congress delegates to select and sign up for specific simulations. The learning objectives included management of the patient on ECLS, indications and contraindications for respiratory and cardiac ECLS, cannulation strategies and techniques, cardiac physiology, patient-circuit interactions and anticoagulation. The learning objectives were also explained at the beginning of each session to ensure a high level of fidelity and attention to details for the attendees.
The sessions lasted between 60 and 90 minutes and covered one or two topics. They were built to cover not only technical skills but also behavioural skills (maintain professional behaviour, call for help, properly use all resources available etc.). All the simulations were prepared using the principle of the suspension of disbelief to help the attendees learn using scenarios similar to their clinical practice but in a controlled environment without any consequences for the patients.7,9–11 At the end of each session, a debriefing was performed with the attendees to fix any concerns and improve both their technical and behavioural skills. Participant examination was not performed due to the lack of time. However, a questionnaire evaluating the quality of the simulation session was prepared by the Working Group for Education of the EuroELSO. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the impact of this learning strategy on the attendees using a dedicated questionnaire after each simulation session. The questionnaire (Table 1) included three open-ended questions (with an option for a free response for suggestions and ideas) and five closed-ended questions with response options of ‘yes’, ‘somewhat’ or ‘no’, referring to the educational goals that were set and achieved. After each session, all the data from the completed questionnaires were evaluated using an Excel form (Microsoft™ Office Standard Excel version 2016).
The content of the questionnaire.
ECLS: extracorporeal life support.
Results
In total, 395 conference delegates, from an overall attendance of approximately 1,500 delegates, participated in the Educational Corner’s activities. Five teams provided simulations covering five different topics (Table 2). Each topic was repeated four times (Figure 1). All the simulation sessions were conducted in English except one, which was held in Spanish (Fisiología del ECLS – Simulación para enfermeras/os). A total of 327 attendees participated at the simulation sessions, but only 140 (42.8%) participants completed the questionnaire. The distribution of the responses according to each session is illustrated in Figure 1.
Educational content with aims and learning goals.
CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy; ECLS: extracorporeal life support; VA: venous arterial; LV: left ventricular; VV: venous venous.

Number of the participants in each workshop and survey participants.
A total of 100% of the responding participants considered the Educational Corner to be an important part of the EuroELSO annual meeting, as it provides a practical approach to ECLS-related techniques. More than 90% of responders indicated that they would recommend the workshop to their colleagues and that they received useful information during the workshops (Figure 2). Over 85% of the responders (85-97%) indicated that the workshops met the set educational goals and objectives. There were, however, differences in responders’ opinions about the impact of the simulation sessions on their clinical practice. A total of 45-70% of responders indicated that the simulation sessions would have a positive impact on their daily practice (Figure 2). The data showed that two workshops, ‘Trouble-Shooting in Paediatric ECLS’ and ‘ECPR in OHCA and IHCA’, were thought to change daily practice in less than 50% of responders (Figure 3).

Number of positive answers to the five closed-ended questions.

Percentage of each answer to the question of whether the workshop will change the current practice of the participants.
The results from the analysis of evaluation questionnaires prepared for the 8th edition of EuroELSO showed how this modality of training is a possible way to improve attendees’ knowledge about ECLS using an active learning environment.
Discussion
Education about ECLS has been developed in parallel to bedside clinical practice with dedicated courses. Many of these courses, however, overemphasize factual knowledge and underemphasize technical and behavioural skills. Simulation-based training has emerged as a valuable tool in critical care education, offering the opportunity to improve technical skills and reduce the risk of human errors.3,4 High-fidelity simulation training has gained popularity at scientific conferences and has been a constant element of the EuroELSO conferences since 2012. The results from the analysis of the evaluation questionnaires showed how this modality of training is an excellent way to improve attendees’ motivation and knowledge about ECLS using an active learning environment. Among all the sessions, those covering the practical aspects of ECLS management with simulations (circuit emergencies, cardiac physiology etc.) were the most recognized (90-100%).
Differences in the participants’ opinions about the impact of the simulation sessions on their clinical practice should be addressed. Changing practice takes time, and challenges and limitations remain that limit the universal adoption of key interventions. Both medical leadership and staff need to work together to achieve the effective implementation of changes. Quality improvement programmes that focus on processes and human factors lead to culture change, which, in turn, leads to demonstrable qualitative and quantitative results.4,5,7
One of the challenges with delivering such training in a conference setting is making it accessible for as many attendees as possible. The EuroELSO Conference uses a model of short educational sessions repeated multiple times. This short exposure time presents problems with delivering meaningful training and education. This is overcome by writing concise educational aims and objectives for each session, enabling both the participants and the trainers to achieve effective training in the short time available. The survey confirms that the attendees identified the objectives and felt that those objectives were met during the training session.
The attendees reported the most positive feedback from the sessions about problem-solving and emergency management. This highlights the benefit of using simulation and experiential learning in a safe environment to explore and gain experiences. Adequate debriefing with feedback, the opportunity for reflection and the identification of learning points are the key to simulation-based training.
The results coming from this evaluation provided feedback for improving the efficacy of the workshops. The majority of the delegates expressed the wish to extend the duration of the offered simulation framework in order to demonstrate more types of circuits and their components, set up the scenarios and increase the number of scenarios. However, time-limited workshops are a compromise in providing as broad an educational offer to as many delegates as possible. It is important for organizers to be open with participants about the fact that the Educational Corner provides a compact focused outline and an introduction to the topic. The sessions cannot replace a full-day workshop. Furthermore, there needs to be a balance between small group workshops and the remainder of the educational offerings within the congress programme in its entirety. New topics suggested for future Educational Corners included anticoagulation in ECLS, training on communication with families and patients on ECLS and additional troubleshooting scenarios. Simulations and practical training are faculty-intensive, requiring one to two faculty members for every five to six participants, and often require industry support, raising the potential for conflicts of interest. Given the current focus on reducing potential conflicts of interest, particularly in Europe, the viability of sessions that are clearly thought to be valuable for participants is potentially at risk.
The data described above produced by the questionnaire are useful for programme designers and workshop providers. The participants did, however, report a low likelihood that current practice will change and the data do not give a clear reason for why this is the case. This standardized survey should continue to be administered annually at the upcoming annual congress to evaluate the needs and input of delegates as well as to record the quality of the conference.
Limitations
The main limitation of this study was the low response rate of 43%. Although this is a reasonable response rate in comparison with other types of studies, unfortunately, 57% of attendees did not share their thoughts on the workshops. The low return rate may have been due to the short time between sessions, overlap with activities in the main congress or the paper-based nature of the assessment form. We will endeavour to simplify the evaluation at future congresses, and we may link it to the receipt of a certificate of attendance.
Such workshops need to be led by both clinical and educational specialists to achieve high-quality training. An important limitation is the difficulty in linking these sessions with improved clinical practice or other outcomes.
Organizing such workshops is also very demanding with regard to logistics, as a substantial amount of educational and ECLS equipment, as well as preparation time, is required on site. Hence, support from the industry and congress organizers is indispensable in setting up an Educational Corner.
Conclusion
The Educational Corner during the EuroELSO Congress has achieved great popularity, as shown by the number of attendees participating each year, and gives an impulse to expand the knowledge in further full-day courses to improve their technical and behavioural skills.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Victoria Schmitt and Christian Reim (both INTERPLAN, Congress, Meeting & Event Management AG, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Strasse 93, 20355 Hamburg, Germany), who distributed the survey form during the 8th EuroELSO Congress in 2019 in Barcelona and then carried out the statistical processing of the forms. The Educational Corner has been supported over the years by many trainers who performed excellent simulations during the past eight conferences free of any honorarium.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: J.S. received ECLS equipment and disposables from Maquet and Biomed Simulation. L.V. received ECLS equipment and disposables from Xenios, Maquet and Medtronic, and the Califia ECLS simulator from Biomed.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The shipment of institutional educational equipment was supported by EuroELSO.
