This case study outlines the use of client-sponsored research projects in a quantitative postgraduate marketing research subject conducted in a 12-week semester in a research-intensive Australian university. The case study attempts to address the dearth of recent literature on client-sponsored research projects in the discipline of marketing. Evaluation results provided from students in a 3-year period indicate support for the use of client-sponsored projects because they provide a number of benefits. In particular, students feel that such projects give invaluable opportunities to develop consulting and research skills that are highly sought after by industry. However, despite the advantages of the client-sponsored research projects, the quantitative nature of the marketing research subject is still an impediment to attaining high student quality teaching scores. Furthermore, there can be problems if students lack basic statistical knowledge, do not practice SPSS outside of class, and segment project tasks within the team. Finally, although client-sponsored marketing research projects can improve the profile of marketing research courses, they demand high levels of energy by the lecturer, a small class size (up to 35 students), and are dependent on a strong degree of client commitment.
Ahmadi, M., & Brabston, M. ( 1997-1998). MIS education: Differences in academic practice and business managers’ expectations. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 38(2), 18-24.
2.
Aiken, M.W., Martin, J.S., & Paolillo, G.P. (1994). Requisite skills of business school graduates: Perceptions of senior corporate executives. Journal of Education for Business, 69, 159-162.
3.
American Marketing Association. (2008). Definition of marketing. Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx
4.
Bandura, A. ( 1989). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 69-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Barr, T.F., & McNeilly, K.M. (2002). The value of students’ classroom experiences from the eyes of the recruiter: Information, implications and recommendations for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 168-173.
6.
Braskamp, L.A., & Ory, J.C. ( 1994). Assessing faculty work: enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
7.
Bridges, E. ( 1999). Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education , 21, 51-59.
8.
Browne, W.G. ( 1979). Using corporate sponsored marketing management projects . Journal of Marketing Education, 1, 39-47.
9.
Burns, A.C. ( 1990). The use of live case studies in business education: Pros, cons, and guidelines. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 201-215). London: Kogan Page.
10.
Burns, A.C., & Bush, R.F. ( 2006). Marketing research & SPSS 13.0. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Calver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. ( 1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Cashin, W.E. ( 1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently . In M. Theall & J. Franklin (Eds.), Students ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice: New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 113-121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Centra, J.A. ( 1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671-684.
15.
Day, G.S. ( 1979). When do the interests of academics and managers converge ? Business Horizons, 22(3), 49-50.
16.
de los Santos, G., & Jensen, T.D. ( 1985). Client-sponsored projects: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Journal of Marketing Education, 7, 45-50.
17.
Dommeyer, C.J. ( 1986). A comparison of the individual proposal and the team project in the marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education, 8, 30-38.
18.
Easterling, D., & Rudell, F. ( 1997). Rationale, benefits and methods of service-learning in marketing education. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 58-61.
19.
Elam, E.L.R., & Spotts, H.E. ( 2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 50-65.
20.
Entwistle, N., & Waterston, S. ( 1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 258-265.
21.
Feldman, K.A. ( 1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Research in Higher Education, 9(3), 199-242.
22.
Goodall, P.W., & Kraft, F.B. ( 1991). Issues on the use of "client" projects in marketing education . Marketing Education Review, 1(4), 32-44.
23.
Gremler, D.D., Douglas Hoffman, K., Keaveney, S.M., & Wright, L.K. ( 2000). Experiential learning exercises in services marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 35-44.
24.
Gribbin, D.W., Karnes, A., & King, J. ( 1995). Accounting practitioner’s views of the relative importance of teaching and research in accounting education. Journal of Education for Business, 70, 215-219.
25.
Haas, R.W., & Wotruba, T.R. ( 1990). The project approach to teaching the capstone marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 37-48.
26.
Hafer, J.C. ( 1984). A comparison of the effectiveness of the small business institute case method. Journal of Marketing Education, 6(Spring), 43-49.
27.
Henke, J.W. ( 1985). Bridging reality to the introductory marketing student . Journal of Marketing Education, 7, 59-71.
28.
Hershey, L., & Smith, P. ( 1991). Client sponsored versus academically oriented projects: Integrating decision technologies into the undergraduate marketing research class. Proceedings of the Midwest Decision Sciences Institute, 188-190.
29.
Holyoak, K.L. ( 1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Hoover, J.D. ( 1977, April). A live case approach to the business and society course. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Wichita, KS.
31.
Humphreys, M.A. ( 1981). Client-sponsored projects in a marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 3, 7-12.
32.
Jones, A.D. ( 1982). Student research in marketing. Journal of Business Education, 57(2), 60-62.
33.
Kennedy, E.J., Lawton, L., & Walker, E. ( 2001). The case for using live cases: Shifting the paradigm in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 145-151.
34.
Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt, E.J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Levenburg, N.M. ( 1996). General management skills: Do practitioners and academic faculty agree on their importance? Journal of Education for Business, 72(1), 47-51.
36.
Lewis, D.A., & Ducharme, R.E. (1990). The education of business undergraduates: A gap in academic/practitioner expectations? Journal of Education for Business, 72(1), 47-51.
37.
Linrud, J.K., & Hall, M.C. ( 1999). Integrating the business practitioner into marketing coursework. Marketing Education Review, 9(2), 15-21.
38.
Lopez, T.B., & Lee, R.G. ( 2005). Five principles for workable client-based projects: Lessons from the trenches. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 172-188.
39.
MacKay, D.B. ( 1979). Professors of marketing: Necessary luxuries? Business Horizons, 22(3), 42-47.
40.
Marsh, H.W., & Dunkin, M. ( 1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multi-dimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook on theory and research (pp. 143-234). New York: Agathon.
41.
Marshak, S., & De Groot, J. ( 1978). Marketing: Who should teach what to whom? Journal of Advertising Research, 18(2), 17-20.
42.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: Author, National Academy Press.
43.
Neumann, R. ( 2000). Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: Rating interpretation guides (RIGs). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 121-134.
44.
The Online Tutor. (2008). Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://tlu.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/online/tools/online_tutor.html
45.
Osthiemer, R.H. ( 1977). The two worlds of marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 17(1), 7-11.
46.
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Peters, W.H. ( 1980). The marketing professor-practitioner gap: A possible solution. Journal of Business Education, 2(2), 4-11.
48.
Ramocki, S.P. ( 1987). Measured effectiveness of client-sponsored consulting . Journal of Marketing Education, 9, 24-30.
49.
Razzouk, N.Y., Seitz, V., & Rizkallah, E. ( 2003). Learning by doing: Using experiential projects in the undergraduate marketing strategy course. Marketing Education Review, 13(2), 35-41.
50.
Richardson, N., & Raveed, S. ( 1980). A live-case program for teaching marketing research. Journal of Marketing Education, 2, 38-42.
51.
Sixbury, G.R., & Cashin, W.E. ( 1995a). Description of database for the IDEA Diagnostic Form . In Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, IDEA paper, vol. 9. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
52.
Sixbury, G.R., & Cashin, W.E. ( 1995b). IDEA technical report 10: Comparative data by academic field. Manhattan: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
53.
Stern, B.L., & Tseng, P.D. ( 2002). Do academics and practitioners agree on what and how to teacher the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 225-232.
54.
Strong, J.T., & Anderson, R.E. (1990). Free riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61-67.
55.
Ward, J., & Rudelius, W. ( 1987, November). Using discovery techniques to teach marketing: Evaluation and prospects. Paper presented at the conference of the American Marketing Educators, Toronto .
56.
Wiggins, G. ( 1998). Effective assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
