Receptor Visionaries

Abstract

Sensory receptors were described and illustrated after they had been observed with the aid of microscopes. Most descriptions were made in the 19th century after the introduction of achromatic lenses in microscopes. In some senses (like vision), receptors were named according to their morphology whereas in others (like touch), they are known by the names of those who initially described them. Illustrations of the receptors from original sources are here combined with portraits of their originators.

Keywords

senses receptors microanatomy anatomists ‘perceptual portraits’

Introduction

Cells were described soon after the first microscopes were focused on animal matter (see Lancaster, 2014). Hooke (1665) gave them their name and identified plant cells. The senses also came under similar early microscopic scrutiny. The application of microscopes to biological specimens was a huge leap assisting understanding, but the microscopes themselves were neither powerful nor free from optical aberrations; the techniques for preparing specimens for observation were also wanting (Turner, 1998). The gross features of the nervous system had been examined with the naked eye, but a new world was exposed by the microscope, and this world was examined by Malpighi (1665). As a consequence of the many biological structures he examined microscopically (both plant and animal), Malpighi is often regarded as the first histologist. In addition to chick embryos, where he provided one of the first accurate descriptions of development in the nervous system, he examined the brain (including the optic nerve), the skin (which now has a Malpighian layer) and the tongue. He applied to the interpretations of physiology the mechanistic concepts derived from the Galilean school; microscopic organization of living tissues was seen as based on the functioning of a multitude of minute machines. The type of microscope Malpighi used is not known (Motta, 1998) unlike Hooke (1665) who gave textual detail and illustrated his compound microscope; Hooke also described a more powerful simple microscope (Ford, 2007). It was with such a device that van Leeuwenhoek (1675) observed a variety of animal cells, including nerve fibres. Microscopes improved in design and in the quality of lenses within them during the 18th century (for a survey of early microscopes, see Mayall, 1886) but interest in focusing the instruments on sensory receptors was not at the forefront.

The microscopic world was transformed by the introduction of powerful achromatic instruments in the 1830s, and rapid advances were made thereafter (Harris, 1999; Schickore, 2007). Among those who combined the achromatic microscope with remarkable observational skills was Purkinje (1837). In 1832, Purkinje obtained an achromatic microscope (Chvátal, 2017) and directed it at the large cells in the cerebellum, thereby identifying the cells that bear his name. His microscopic observations were made before any adequate staining methods had been developed. Purkinje used alcohol to fix his preparations, and he made thin sections so that they could be examined microscopically. Purkinje’s laboratory at Breslau (present-day Vroclaw) has been described as the cradle of histology, and it was matched only by that in Berlin, established by Johannes Müller (Otis, 2007). The cell doctrine was most clearly articulated by Schleiden (1838) for plants and Schwann (1839) for animals and it is associated with their names. At the end of the century, Waldeyer (1891) extended the doctrine to nerves. He named the nerve cell body, its fibres and arborisations as a ‘Neurone’ and supported the theory that neurons were the fundamental structural and functional units of the nervous system. Some of these cell visionaries are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Cell visionaries by Nicholas Wade. Upper left, cork cells as illustrated by Robert Hooke (1635–1703; Hooke, 1665) contain portraits of Matthias Schleiden (1804–1881) and Theodor Schwann (1810–1882). Upper right, Antonius van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723) together with the simple microscope through which he viewed biological tissues. Lower left, Wilhelm von Waldeyer (1836–1921) combined with an illustration of neurons. Lower right, a portrait of Jan Evangelista Purkinje (1787–1869), a Plössl achromatic microscope of the type he used and the illustration of the large cerebellar cells (derived from Purkinje, 1837) that bear his name.

Among the microscopic structures that were isolated and described after the cell doctrine had been enunciated were specialized sensory cells, called receptors, and they could be related to the stimuli that excited them. Those located in well-defined sense organs were named on the basis of their morphology (rods, cones, hair cells, etc.), whereas the receptors in or beneath the surface of the skin were generally named after those who first described them (e.g. Golgi tendon organs, Krause end-bulbs, Meissner corpuscles, Merkel discs, Pacinian corpuscles and Ruffini cylinders). It is clear that there are many specialised sensory cells. They will be examined here with regard to the retina, inner ear, papillae on the tongue, olfactory cells and receptors in the skin, muscles and tendons. Illustrations of cell microanatomies as illustrated by those who described them will be combined with portraits of the scientists who drew attention to them. I call these ‘perceptual portraits’ (see Wade, 1995, 2006, 2016, 2017).

Retina

The concept that there were specialised receptors arrived relatively late on the sensory scene. In the 17th century, when Descartes (1637/1902) was discussing the eye, he considered that the retina consisted of nerve endings and that their dimensions defined the limits of visual resolution (see Wade, 2004). As these were of a particular size, he argued that no object smaller than a fibre ending could be resolved. This relationship was maintained even when the microanatomy of the retinal cells was better understood. Treviranus (1837, Figure 2) presented drawings based on vertical and horizontal microscopic sections of cells in the visual systems of many species. His diagram of the crow’s retina indicated a wider variation in retinal structure than had previously been represented, and the layers within it are clearly shown. The papillae were directed towards the incoming light rather than away from it. In this regard, Treviranus was reflecting Descartes’ idea that the terminations of the optic nerves were the receptive elements in the retina, and that they were directed towards the lens. The years following 1840 saw rapid advances in fixing, sectioning and staining microscopic preparations (Finger, 1994; Harris, 1999; Schickore, 2007). Nonetheless, Treviranus described and illustrated cylindrical cells in the retinas of a variety of animals, and opened the way for others to examine the microscopic structure of the retina in more detail. As Polyak (1957) remarked: ‘The work of Treviranus, though erroneous in almost every point, was beneficial because it stimulated an immediate series of investigations’ (p. 48). Treviranus was a comparative zoologist who did much to establish biology as an independent discipline within Germany, and to provide support for the cell doctrine. The correct anatomical orientation of the retinal elements was described shortly after Treviranus by Bidder (1839); the terminations of the optic nerve structures were directed towards the choroid rather than the lens. A decade later, Bowman (1847/1849) provided a diagram of the retina, which distinguished between what he called rods and bulbs (Figure 2). Bowman described the constituents of the retina in the following way: ‘The elements peculiar to the retina are … of two kinds – Columnar particles, or rods, arranged vertically in a single series; and Bulbous particles, interspersed at regular intervals among the former’ (p. 80). He drew attention to the disagreements about the interpretations of the terminal structures of the retina, and to the difficulties of obtaining good specimens for microscopical study. Bowman described differences in the numbers of rods and bulbs in different species, but no generalization was drawn from this.

Figure 2.

The retinas of Treviranus, Bowman, Kölliker and Schultze by Nicholas Wade. Upper left, Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus (1776–1837) is shown in his diagram of the crow retina in his posthumously published volume on the inner structure of the retina (derived from Treviranus, 1837). Upper right, William Bowman (1816–1892) is portrayed within the diagram of the human retina derived from Bowman (1847/1849). Lower left, Alfred Kölliker (1817–1905) can be seen in his representation of the retina (derived from Kölliker, 1854). Lower right, Max Schultze (1825–1874) and his illustration of retinal structure, flanked by his diagrams of an isolated rod and cone (derived from Schultze, 1866).

Helmholtz drew upon the burgeoning histological research that was emerging from German laboratories. The authorities on retinal structure were Kölliker (Figure 2) and his collaborator Heinrich Müller. The figure Helmholtz (1867) used to illustrate retinal structure in the first volume of his Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik was from Kölliker (1850), but he changed it in the second edition (Helmholtz, 1896) to that by Schultze (Figure 2), together with Schultze’s (1866) diagram of a single rod and cone. The numerical ordering of the layers in the retina was reversed, too (see Wade, 2007). For Kölliker’s diagram, the sequence started with the rod and cone layer; for Schultze’s diagram, the number of layers was extended to 10, and the sequence terminated with the choroid. The English translation of Helmholtz (1924) confounds the two accounts; the text is taken from the first edition, but Schultze’s diagram from the second edition replaces that of Kölliker. The third German edition (and therefore the English translation) is based on the text of Helmholtz’s first edition, and so contains this conflation.

Schultze succeeded Helmholtz in the chair of anatomy at Bonn in 1859, when Helmholtz moved to Heidelberg. In the first volume of his Handbuch, Helmholtz (1924) was able to state that ‘The retina is composed partly of the microscopical components of the nervous system (nerve fibres, ganglion cells and nuclei), and partly of certain characteristic elements, the so-called rods (bacilli) and cones (coni)’ (p. 24). Only cones were present in the fovea. Schultze (1866) also examined the complement of rods and cones in a variety of animals, and was able to suggest that rods and cones function under different levels of illumination – duplicity theory.

Bowman (1847/1849) referred to ‘rods’ and ‘bulbs’ as the two cell types in the retina but Hannover’s (1844) ‘cônes’ was the name for the latter that was generally adopted. In German, they were called Zapfen, and this is the term used by Helmholtz (1867).

Schultze’s (1866) suggestion of different functions for rods and cones instigated a search for differences in their chemical compositions that could account for them. Heinrich Müller (1851, Figure 3) observed the colours of the retinas of frogs: ‘The rods of frogs appear somewhat reddish, where they lie in a sufficient density over one another, and one can see single rods alternatively colourless or coloured, depending upon whether they are lying or upright’ (p. 236). Müller’s discovery of the coloured retinal receptors was not actively pursued for another two decades when his pioneering observation was acknowledged by Boll (1876, Figure 3). Boll (1877/1977) referred to the colour of the dark-adapted retina as ‘intense purple-red’ but he revised this in his second, longer publication to ‘visual red’ and this reddish colour became paler when exposed to light (see Baumann, 1977; Wade, 2008a). Kühne (1879/1977, Figure 3) extended Boll’s work but referred to the unbleached retinal chemical as ‘visual purple’ (see Wade, 2008b). Kühne extracted rhodopsin from the rods of frogs and rabbits and showed that the rate of bleaching was dependent not only on the intensity of light but also on its wavelength. The visual purple was confined to rods and was not seen in the foveas of humans. Most significantly, Kühne established the ‘visual cycle’: Visual purple in the rods is bleached by light to form visual yellow which in turn is transformed to visual white.

Figure 3.

The red retinas of Müller, Boll and Kühne by Nicholas Wade. Left, Heinrich Müller (1820–1864) described the red retina and also investigated the Purkinje tree. Centre, a portrait of Franz Boll (1849–1879) is contained within a motif of retinal rods (modified from a detail of an illustration in Boll, 1877/1977). Right, the visage of Willy Kühne (1837–1900) is combined with diagrams of the retinal rods of dark adapted frogs (derived from a figure in Kühne, 1879/1977).

Inner Ear

The location of the inner ear within the bony labyrinth made it difficult to dissect and delayed investigation into its structure. In one of the earliest books dedicated to the ear and hearing, Du Verney (1683) lamented the state of studies of that sense:

Of all the Organs assign’d to the Use of Animals, we have the least Knowledge of those of the Senses; but there is none more obscure than that of Hearing: the Minuteness and Delicacy of the Parts which compose it, being inclos’d by other Parts, (which by reason of their Hardness, are scarcely penetrable) render the Enquiries into them more difficult, and their Structure something so intricate, that there is as much Trouble in explaining, as there is in discovering them. (1737, p. vii)

Despite these difficulties, Scarpa (1789; Figure 4) provided detailed diagrams of the cochlear and vestibular system. This paved the way for his fellow countryman, Corti (1851; Figure 4), to provide some detail of the microanatomy of the cochlea.

Figure 4.

The inner ears of Scarpa, Corti, Deiters, Retzius, Held and Wersäll by Nicholas Wade. Upper left, Antonio Scarpa (1752–1832) produced detailed grey-scale representations of the cochlea and vestibular apparatus as well as outline drawings, both of which are shown (derived from Scarpa, 1789). Upper right, Alfonso Corti (1822–1876) can be seen within his coloured illustration of the structure and hair cells on the basilar membrane of the cochlea (derived from Corti, 1851); the plate was folded in the journal which accounts for the differences in the intensity of the background. Centre left, Otto Deiters (1834–1863) illustrated the cells (f in the illustration) supporting the hair cells (derived from O. Deiters, 1859). Centre right, one of the diagrams by Gustaf Retzius (1842–1919) of the structure of the organ of Corti (derived from Retzius, 1884) together with his portrait. Lower left, a portrait of Hans Held (1866–1942) and figures from Held (1909) illustrating cells in the saccule of rabbits and pigeons. Lower right, Jan Wersäll (1930–2017) and his schematic illustration of Type I and Type II cells from the ampulla of guinea pig (derived from Wersäll, 1956).

Scarpa added greatly to knowledge of the anatomy of the senses as well as of the brain (Grzybowski & Sak, 2013). He made important discoveries on the anatomy of the internal ear and of the vestibular system (as attested by Scarpa’s ganglion). He described accurately the innervation of the heart, correcting the commonly held error that the heart lacked nerves. He was also a great surgeon and he developed new surgical approaches particularly in the treatment of urinary bladder stones. His skills as an artist are evident in the anatomical drawings that are produced from copper plates in his books. Scarpa was a friend of the Corti family and as a medical student in Pavia, Corti was greatly influenced by Scarpa’s anatomical studies. After graduating in medicine from Vienna, Corti studied histology under Kölliker in Würzburg where he worked on the retina before turning to the cochlea (Kley, 1986). There are many named features of structures in the inner ear (Mudry, 2001) but that of Corti stands out. His involvement in auditory research was restricted to the early 1850s, but its impact was immense. Corti (1850) published a brief report of his research which included some illustrations; the article following his in Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin was by Helmholtz (1850) on measures of the speed of nerve transmission. Corti’s (1851) longer article in the following year gave the coloured illustration with which his portrait is combined in Figure 4. Corti distinguished between the inner and outer hair cells on the basilar membrane as well as many other anatomical features of the inner ear, and Helmholtz (1865) drew extensively on Corti’s studies to develop his resonance theory of hearing.

The nerve fibres supplying the inner and outer hair cells were traced by Schultze (1858) but it was his colleague in Bonn, O. Deiters (1859, 1860), who explored the structures of the inner ear in more detail (Figure 4). He indicated how the inner and outer hair cells were arranged in arcs and he also described the supporting cells for the hair cells, with which his name is associated (see V. S. Deiters & Guillery, 2013). Retzius (1884) provided elegant illustrations of the cell structures on the organ of Corti (Figure 4). Like many anatomists before him, his illustrations were initially produced by an artist but dissatisfaction with this procedure resulted in him making his own drawings. Retzius spent most of his academic life at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm (Grant, 2011).

The inner ear also comprises three semicircular canals and two otolith organs (utricle and saccule) the gross anatomies of which were illustrated by Scarpa (1789) and Retzius (1884). The nonacoustic parts of the inner ear (semicircular canals and otolith organs) have been neglected relative to the cochlear because their function remained unknown long after the role of the cochlear in audition had been appreciated. Indeed, the orthogonal semicircular canals were thought to be involved in auditory localization until their link to vertigo was established (see Wade, 2000). The semicircular canals serve to detect angular accelerations of the head and the otolith organs register the orientation of the head to gravity (a linear acceleration). Thus the inclusion of the vestibular system in the theatre of the senses came rather late. The anatomy of the semicircular canals was well established (see van de Water, 2012) before the function they served was clarified independently by Mach, Breuer, and Crum Brown in the 1870s. The accelerations are detected by bending hair cells in the ampullae of the semicircular canals or beneath the otolith layers of the utricle and saccule. These were elegantly illustrated by Held (1909; Figure 4) together with many representations of cells in the organ of Corti. In the illustration of the hair cells from the saccule of a pigeon (Held, 1909, Figure 33) the epithelial surface is referred to as the cupula and the otoliths are not represented. The distinction between two types of hair cell was to await the examination of the inner ear by means of electronmicroscopes (Wersäll, 1956); he called the flask-shaped hair cells Type I and the cylindrical cells Type II (Figure 4). Wersäll worked in the Karolinska Institute where Retzius had conducted his histological investigation of the inner ear.

Tongue

Malpighi (1665, Figure 5) described and illustrated the papillae on the tongue. In his illustration, he divided the tongue into five sections and noted the distribution of the papillae, particularly in the posterior section. His diagram of the microscopic features of the tongue is inset at the upper left. Waller (1847, Figure 5) examined the tongue of frog and distinguished between two types of papillae. He carried out similar studies on human tongue and described conical or filiform papillae and fungiform papillae (Waller, 1849). The detailed cellular structure of mammalian taste buds was provided independently by Lovén (1867, 1868) and Schwalbe (1867) although neither of them mentioned Malpighi. Lovén initially presented his account in Swedish and this was acknowledged by Schwalbe (1868). They showed that the papillae contained clusters of cells around their sides. Schwalbe called the them ‘taste cups’ whereas Lovén referred to them as ‘taste bulbs’ or ‘taste onions’. Titchener (1915) called them ‘taste-buds’ or ‘taste-beakers’. Schwalbe was a student of Max Schultze and Lovén was a professor in Stockholm; they are both shown in Figure 5, contained within an illustration based on Lovén’s (1867) representation of a circumvallate papilla taken from Schwalbe’s (1887) text book.

Figure 5.

The tastes of Malpighi, Waller, Lovén and Schwalbe by Nicholas Wade. Upper left: Marcello Malpighi (1628–1694) is shown with his illustrations of the papillae on the tongue (derived from Malpighi, 1665). Upper right: Augustus Waller (1816–1870) is shown within his illustration of a fungiform papilla from a frog (derived from Waller, 1847). Lower, the diagram of a circumvallate papilla is from Schwalbe (1887) and it is based on an earlier engraving by Lovén (1867). Christian Lovén (1835–1904) is embedded on the left and Gustav Schwalbe (1844–1916) is on the right.

Nose

The olfactory bulb was clearly described and illustrated by Scarpa (1789) but the detail of the olfactory receptors awaited microscopic investigations (Doty, 2015). The observations and illustrations by Eckhard (1855), Ecker (1855, 1857) and Schultze (1856, 1862) did much to clarify the structure of olfactory receptors and the pathways of nerves from them (Figure 6). Eckhard was an anatomist and physiologist at Giessen where he examined the olfactory cells in frogs distinguishing between two types, cylindrical and fusiform. Ecker was an anatomist at Freiburg and studied cells in the olfactory systems of frogs and humans. Both Eckhard (1862) and Ecker (1864, 1869) wrote textbooks on anatomy. Schultze examined the sensory cells within the nose before he investigated those in the eye and his research on olfactory receptors is chronicled by Zippel (1993).

Figure 6.

The olfactory cilia of Ecker, Eckhard and Schultze by Nicholas Wade. Left: A portrait of Alexander Ecker (1816–1887) is combined with a diagram of epithelial and ciliary olfactory cells of the frog (derived from Ecker, 1864). Centre: Conrad Eckhard (1822–1905) is shown with olfactory cells of humans (derived from Eckhard, 1862). Right: Max Schultze (1825–1874) with the olfactory cells from owl, pike, frog and human (derived from Schultze, 1856).

Skin, Muscles and Joints

In contrast to the restricted range of receptors in the eye, ear, mouth and nose, the skin provided histologists with a startling variety of specialised cells. In chronological sequence, they were described by Pacini (1840), Meissner (1853), Krause (1860), Merkel (1875), Golgi (1880) and Ruffini (1894) and their names continue to be associated with the receptor cells. The anatomists are shown in Figure 7 together with representations of the cells bearing their names.

Figure 7.

Explorers of the skin by Nicholas Wade. From left to right, Filippo Pacini (1812–1883), Georg Meissner (1829–1905), Wilhelm Krause (1833–1910), Friedrich Merkel (1845–1919), Camillo Golgi (1843–1926) and Angelo Ruffini (1864–1929) combined with illustrations of their eponymous cells.

Pacini first observed the onion-shaped cells that bear his name in 1831 during a dissection class as a medical student (Bentivoglio & Pacini, 1995; Henle & Kölliker, 1844) but he did not publish an account of them until 1840 and his illustration was reprinted in his 1889 study. The cells are large and had been seen as early as 1741 by Abraham Vater in the skin of human fingertips. He called them ‘papillae nerveae’ and they were examined in greater detail by his student Johann Gottlob Lehmann in the same year (see Vater, 1747); they are also referred to as Vater–Pacinian bodies (Neumeister, 1845). Meissner initially described his microscopic observations of human skin together with his professor at Göttingen (Wagner & Meissner, 1852) and then published them in his own name the following year; they are occasionally called Meissner–Wagner corpuscles (Nafe, 1934). The touch corpuscles were considered to respond to deep pressure. Krause’s (1861) end-bulbs or corpuscles were described in 1860 and his portrait is combined with an illustration of a touch cell from the conjunctiva of a human eye. Merkel (1875) illustrated a variety of specialized skin receptors including the ‘touch cell’ with which his name became attached 3 years later. His atlas of the skin and sense organs (Merkel, 1917) contained the schematic diagram of a Merkel cell from a human lip that was used in Figure 7. Golgi (1880) observed two types of cells in the region of the tendon. One was somewhat like the cells described by Pacini and Krause which Golgi referred to it as a ‘tactile body’. Mazzoni (1890) showed that they are present in the skin and they are now referred to Golgi–Mazzoni corpuscles. The portrait of Golgi is combined with an illustration of the cells from Merkel (1917). Ruffini is shown in a duplicate and reflection of the representation of cylindrical cells in his 1894 study; the publication also drew attention to the Golgi–Mazzoni subcutaneous receptors.

Cutaneous sensory ‘spots’ specifically responsive to touch (pressure) and pain, as well as warmth and cold, had been described by Ritter (1801) and were isolated later in the century, using more sensitive and specific apparatus. A division of the skin senses into three separate systems (one to register temperature, a second for pressure and a third for touch) was proposed by Natanson (1844; see Norrsell, Finger, and Lajonchere, 1999). Three sets of independent studies were reported in the 1880s: Blix (1882, 1884) followed by Goldscheider (1884) and Donaldson (1885). All three argued for a separate temperature sense and this was implicitly supported by von Frey (1894) who linked the sensations of touch, warmth, cold and pain to specific skin receptors. He proposed that Meissner corpuscles were involved in touch perception, Ruffini cylinders for warmth, Krause end-bulbs for cold and free nerve endings for pain (see Melzack & Wall, 1962). His theory survived despite mounting evidence against it (Sinclair, 1967). Blix, Goldscheider and von Frey are shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Cutaneous sensory spots of Blix, Goldscheider and von Frey by Nicholas Wade. Left: Magnus Blix (1849–1904) is shown in mappings of sensory spots for touch (black), cold (green) and warm (red) on the back of the hand; the patterns are reproduced from Blix (1882). Centre: Alfred Goldscheider (1858–1935) can be seen in an illustration of cold (blue) and warm (red) sensitive spots from the fingertips (from Goldscheider, 1885). Right, a portrait of Max von Frey (1852–1932) is combined with a pattern pressure spots from hairy and hairless areas of the human calf (from Von Frey, 1896).

Touch and kinaesthesis are often considered in combination (see Rose & Mountcastle, 1959): Coordinated behaviour is based upon the integration of sensory information from the surface and beneath the skin. The principal receptors were considered to be in the muscles or their tendons which respond to the stretching of muscles or the tension in tendons as well as in the joint capsules. Hassall (1851) illustrated muscle spindles but they were described in greater detail by Ruffini (1898) who distinguished between three different types. Specialised receptors were also found in the tendons by Golgi (1880) and they continue to be known as Golgi tendon organs. The joint receptors are considered to be of four types similar to those which have been mentioned earlier: free nerve endings, Golgi endings, Ruffini cylinders and Pacinian corpuscles. The muscle and tendon receptors are shown in Figure 9 together with their discoverers.

Figure 9.

Kinaesthetes by Nicholas Wade. Left: Arthur Hill Hassall (1817–1894) in an illustration of muscle spindles in the tongue (derived from Hassall, 1851). Centre: Angelo Ruffini in his representation of muscle spindles (Ruffini, 1898). Right: Camillo Golgi combined with his illustration of nerves supplying tendon organs (derived from Golgi, 1880).

Hassall (1849), a general practitioner from London, published one of the first books devoted to microscopic anatomy; it consisted of two volumes that were lavishly illustrated with many of the figures in colour. It was translated into German (Hassall, 1852) and an American edition was published in 1851. Additional plates of illustrations were produced for the latter and it was one of these that contained the initial indications of muscle spindles; the German translation did not contain it. Ruffini (1898) acknowledged that Hassall’s (1851) ‘description and interpretation, although brief, show clearly he had before him “muscle-spindles”’ (p. 190). Weismann (1861) provided more detail of the organization of the muscle spindles within the ‘Weismann bundles’ and Kühne (1863) gave them the name ‘muscle spindles’. When Golgi (1880) investigated the receptors in the tendons that bear his name he was able to use his revolutionary silver staining method (see Golgi, 1873; Mazzarello, 2010; Wade & Piccolino, 2006).

Conclusions

The scientists portrayed in this early history of receptors were visionaries in two senses. They used their observational skills to detect and describe the receptors in a variety of senses. They were also visionaries because they encapsulated their discoveries with schematic diagrams that could be appreciated with a greater precision than their written descriptions. Some, like Scarpa, Retzius and Golgi, displayed their artistry in the representations they published. Moreover, most of the discoveries were made before staining methods assisted in isolating the neural structures when observed under the microscope.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Baumann

(1977). Franz Boll. Vision Research, 17, 1267–1268.

Bentivoglio

Pacini

(1995). Filippo Pacini: A determined observer. Brain Research Bulletin, 38, 161–165.

Bidder, F. (1839). Zur Anatomie der Retina, insbesondere zur Würdigung der stabförmigen Körper in derselben [On the anatomy of the retina, in particular to the appreciation of the rod-shaped body in the same]. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medizin 371–385.

Blix

(1882). Experimentella bidrag till lösning af frågan om hudnervernas specifika energi [Experimental contributions to the solution of the issue of skin nerve specific energy]. Upsala Läkareföreningars Förhandlingar, 18, 87–103.

Blix

(1884). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lösung der Frage über die specifische Energie der Hautnerven [Experimental contributions to the solution of the question about the specific energy of the cutaneous nerves]. Zeitschrift für Biologie, 20, 141–156.

Boll, F. (1876). Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina [On the anatomy and physiology of the retina]. In Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (pp. 783–787). Berlin, Germany: Königlichen Akademie der Wissenchaften.

Boll, F. (1877). Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina [On the anatomy and physiology of the retina]. Archiv für Physiologie 4–37. (R. Hubbard, Trans. Reprinted in Vision Research, 1977, 17, 1245–1265.).

Bowman, W. (1849). Lectures on the parts concerned in the operations on the eye, and on the structure of the retina. London, England: Longmans, Brown, Green, and Longmans (Delivered at the Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital, Moorfields, June 1847.).

Chvátal

(2017). Jan Evangelista Purkyně (1787–1869) and his instruments for microscopic research in the field of neuroscience. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 26, 238–256.

10.

Corti, A. (1850). Beitrag zur Anatomie der Retina [Contribution to the anatomy of the retina]. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie and wissenschaftliche Medizin 273–275.

11.

Corti

(1851). Recherches sur l’organe de l’ouie des mammiféres. Première partie: Limaçon [Research on the organ of the mammal’s hearing. First part: Limaçon]. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 3, 109–169.

12.

Deiters

(1859). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Lamina spiralis membranacea der Schnecke [Contributions to the knowledge of the lamina spiralis membranacea of the snail]. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 10, 1–12.

13.

Deiters

(1860) Untersuchungen über die Lamina spiralis membranacea. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss des inneren Gehörorgans [Studies on the lamina spiralis membranacea. A contribution to the knowledge of the internal auditory organ], Bonn, Germany: Henry and Cohen.

14.

Deiters

V. S.

Guillery

R. W.

(2013). Otto Friedrich Karl Deiters (1834–1863). Journal of Comparative Neurology, 521, 1929–1953.

15.

Descartes

(1637/1902). La dioptrique [Dioptrics]. In: Adam

Tannery

(eds) Oeuvres de Descartes,, Vol. 6, Paris, France: Cerf, pp. 81–228.

16.

Donaldson

H. H.

(1885). On the temperature-sense. Mind, 10, 399–416.

17.

Doty, R. L. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of olfaction and gustation (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

18.

Du Verney

(1683) Traité de l’organe de l’ouïe, contenant la structure, les usages et les maladies de toutes les parties de l’oreille [Treatise on the organ of hearing, containing the structure, the uses and the diseases of all parts of the ear], Paris, France: Michallet.

19.

Du Verney

(1737) A treatise of the organ of hearing: Containing the structure, the uses, and the diseases of all parts of the ear, London, England: Baker.

20.

Ecker

(1855). Über das Epithelium der Riechschleimhaut und die wahrscheinliche Endigung des Geruchsnerven beim Menschen und den Säugethieren [On the epithelium of olfactory mucous membrane and probable termination of the olfactory nerve of humans and mammals]. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg im Breisgau, 2, 199–206.

21.

Ecker

(1857). Ueber die Geruchsschleimhaut des Menschen [On the smell mucous membrane of humans]. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 8, 303–306.

22.

Ecker

(1864) Die Anatomie des Frosches [The anatomy of the frog], Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.

23.

Ecker

(1869) Die Hirnwindungen des Menschen nach eigenen Untersuchungen [The brain convolutions of humans from original investigations], Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.

24.

Eckhard

(1855). Über die Endigungsweise des Geruchsnerven [On the termination of the olfactory nerve]. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie, 1, 77–84.

25.

Eckhard

(1862) Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen [Textbook of human anatomy], Giessen, Germany: Ferber’sche Universitäts-Buchhandlung.

26.

Finger

(1994) Origins of neuroscience, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

27.

Ford

B. J.

(2007). Enlightening neuroscience: Microscopes and microscopy in the eighteenth century. In: Witaker

Smith

C. U. M.

Finger

(eds) Brain, mind and medicine: Essays in eighteenth-century neuroscience, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 29–41.

28.

Goldscheider

(1884). Die specifische Energie der Temperaturenerven [The specific energy of the temperature nerves]. Monatsschrift für praktische Dermatologie, 3, 198–208.

29.

Goldscheider

(1885). Neue Thatsache über die Hautsinnesnerven [New fact about the skin sensory nerves]. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 1–110.

30.

Golgi

(1873). Sulla struttura della sostanza grigia del cervello [On the structure of the grey substance of the brain]. Gazzetta Medica Italiana (Lombardia), 6, 244–246.

31.

Golgi

(1880). Sui nervi dei tendini dell’uomo e di altri vertebri e di un nuovo organo nervosa terminale musculo-tendineo [On the nerves of human tendons and other vertebrae and of a new musculo-tendinous terminal nerve organ]. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 32, 359–386.

32.

Grant

(2011). Gustaf Retzius (1842–1919). Journal of Neurology, 258, 706–707.

33.

Grzybowski

Sak

(2013). Antonio Scarpa (1752–1832). Journal of Neurology, 260, 295–296.

34.

Hannover

(1844) Recherches microscopiques sur la système nerveux [Microscopic research on the nervous system], Copenhagen, Denmark: Philipsen.

35.

Harris

(1999) The birth of the cell, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

36.

Hassall

A. H.

(1849) The microscopic anatomy of the human body, in health and disease, Vol. 1, London, England: Samuel Highley.

37.

Hassall

A. H.

(1851) The microscopic anatomy of the human body, in health and disease, Vol. 1, New York, NY: Pratt, Woodford.

38.

Hassall, A. H. (1852). Arthur Hill Hassall’s mikroskopische Anatomie des menschlichen Körpers im gesunden und kranken Zustande [Arthur Hill Hassall’s microscopic anatomy of the human body in health and disease] (O. Kohlschütter, Trans.). Leipzig, Germany: Schäfer.

39.

Held, H. (1909). Untersuchungen über den feineren Bau des Ohrlabyrinthes der Wirbeltiere II. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des cortischen Organs und der Macula Acustica bei Säugetieren und Vögeln [Investigations on the finer construction of the ear labyrinth of vertebrates II. The developmental history of the cortical organ and the macula acustica in mammals and birds]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner.

40.

Helmholtz, H. (1850). Messungen über den zeitlichen Verlauf der Zuckung animalischer Muskeln und die Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit der Reizung in den Nerven [Measurements of the time course of contraction of animal muscles and the transmission speed following stimulation in the nerves]. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie and wissenschaftliche Medizin, 276–364.

41.

Helmholtz

(1865) Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen [The theory of tone sensations], Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.

42.

Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik [Handbook of physiological optics]. In G. Karsten (Ed.), Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physik (Vol. 9, pp. 1–874). Leipzig, Germany: Voss.

43.

Helmholtz

(1896) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik [Handbook of physiological optics], (2nd ed). Leipzig, Germany: Voss.

44.

Helmholtz, H. (1924). Helmholtz’s treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 1). (J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York, NY: Optical Society of America.

45.

Henle

Kölliker

(1844) Ueber die Pacinischen Körperchen an den Nerven des Menschen und der Säugethiere [On the Pacinian corpuscles of the nerves of humans and mammals], Zürich, Switzerland: Meyer & Zeller.

46.

Hooke

(1665) Micrographia: Or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses with observations and inquiries thereupon, London, England: Martyn and Allestry.

47.

Kley

(1986). Alfonso Corti (1822–1876)—Discoverer of the sensory end organ of hearing in Würzburg. Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology and its Related Specialities, 48, 61–67.

48.

Kölliker, A. (1850). Mikroskopische Anatomie. Zweiter Band [Microscopical anatomy] (Vol. 2). Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

49.

Kölliker, A. (1854). Manual of human histology. Volume 2. (G. Busk & T. Huxley, Trans.). London, England: The Sydenham Society.

50.

Krause

(1860) Die terminalen Körperschen der einfach sensiblen Nerven [The terminal bodies of the simple sensory nerves], Hannover, Germany: Hahn.

51.

Krause

(1861) Anatomische Untersuchungen [Anatomical investigations], Hannover, Germany: Hahn.

52.

Kühne

(1863). Die Muskelspindeln [The muscle spindles]. Archiv für pathologischen Anatomie, 28, 528–537.

53.

Kühne, W. (1879). Chemische Vorgänge in der Netzhaut [Chemical processes in the retina]. In L. Hermann (Ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie (Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 136–141). Leipzig, Germany: F. C. W. Vogel. (R. Hubbard, Trans. Reprinted in Vision Research, 1977, 17, 1269–1316.).

54.

Lancaster

(2014). A focus on the history of light microscopy for cell culture. Kaleidoscope, 6, 27–47.

55.

Lovén

(1867). Bidrag till kännedomen om Tungans Smakpapillen [Contribution to the knowledge of taste papillae on the tongue]. Medicinskt Archiv, 3, 9–23.

56.

Lovén

(1868). Beiträge zur Kenntniss vom Bau der Geschmackswärzchen der Zunge [Contributions to the knowledge of the construction of the taste papillae of the tongue]. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 4, 96–110.

57.

Malpighi

(1665) De lingua [On the tongue], Bologna, Italy: Benati.

58.

Mayall

(1886). The microscope. Journal of the Society of Arts, 34, 987–997, 1007–1021, 1031–1048, 1055–1081, 1095–1121.

59.

Mazzarello

(2010) Golgi. A biography of the founder of modern neuroscience, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

60.

Mazzoni

(1890). Osservazioni microscopiche sopra i così detti corpuscoli terminali dei tendini dell’uomo e sopra alcune particolari piastre nervose superficiali che si trovano nei medesimi tendini [Microscopic observations on the so-called terminal corpuscles of human tendons and on some particular superficial nerve plates that are in the same tendons]. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle scienze dell’Instituto di Bologna, 1, 401–408.

61.

Meissner

(1853) Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Haut [Contributions to the anatomy and physiology of the skin], Leipzig, Germany: Voss.

62.

Melzack

Wall

P. D.

(1962). On the nature of cutaneous sensory mechanisms. Brain, 85, 331–356.

63.

Merkel

(1875). Tastzellen und Tastkörperchen bei den Hausthieren und beim Menschen [Taste cells and taste bodies in the domestic animals and humans]. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 11, 636–652.

64.

Merkel

(1917) Atlas zu Haut, Sinnesorgane und nervöse Zentralorgane [Atlas of the skin, sensory organs and nervous central organs], Wiesbaden, Germany: Bergmann.

65.

Motta

P. M.

(1998). Marcello Malpighi and the foundations of functional microanatomy. The Anatomical Record, 253, 10–12.

66.

Mudry

(2001). The origin of eponyms used in cochlea anatomy. Otology & Neurotology, 22, 258–263.

67.

Müller

(1851). Zur Histologie der Netzhaut [On the histology of retina]. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 3, 234–237.

68.

Nafe

J. P.

(1934). The pressure, pain and temperature senses. In: Murchison

(ed.) A handbook of general experimental psychology, Worcester, MA: Clark University Press, pp. 1037–1087.

69.

Natanson

L. N.

(1844). Analyse der Functionen des Nervensystems [Analysis of the functions of the nervous system]. Archiv für Physiologie und Heilkunde, 3, 515–535.

70.

Neumeister, H. W. (Ed.). (1845). Neues Repertorium der gesammten deutschen medicinisch-chirurgishen Journalistik [New repertory of all German medical-surgical journalism] (Vol. 1). Leipzig, Germany: Kollmann.

71.

Norrsell

Finger

Lajonchere

(1999). Cutaneous sensory spots and the ‘law of specific nerve energies’: History and development of ideas. Brain Research Bulletin, 48, 457–465.

72.

Otis

(2007) Müller’s lab, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

73.

Pacini

(1840) Nuovi organi scoperti nel corpo umano [New organs discovered in the human body], Pistoia, Italy: Cino.

74.

Pacini

(1889) Relazione e catalogo dei manoscitti di Filippo Pacini [Report and catalog of the manuscripts of Filippo Pacini], Rome, Italy: Principali Librai.

75.

Polyak

(1957) The vertebrate visual system, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

76.

Purkinje

(1837). Anatomisch-physiologische Verhandlungen [Anatomical-physiological deliberations]. Bericht über die Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Ärtze, 177–180.

77.

Retzius

(1884) Das Gehörorgan der Wirbelthiere: Morphologisch-histologische Studien [The auditory organ of vertebrate animals: Morphological-histological studies], Vol. 2, Stockholm, Sweden: Samson & Wallin.

78.

Ritter

J. W.

(1801). Versuche und Bemerkungen über den Galvanismus der Voltaischen Batterie [Experiments and observations on the galvanism of the Voltaic Battery]. Annalen der Physik, 7, 431–484.

79.

Rose

J. E.

Mountcastle

V. B.

(1959). Touch and kinesthesis. In: Field

(ed.) Handbook of physiology: Neurophysiology, Vol. 1, Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, pp. 387–429.

80.

Ruffini

(1894) Di un nuovo nervosa terminale e sulla presenza dei corpusculi Golgi-Mazzoni nel connettivo sottocutaneo dei polpastrelli delle dita dell’uomo [A new terminal nerve and the presence of Golgi–Mazzoni corpuscles in the subcutaneous connective tissue of the fingers of man], Rome, Italy: Accademia dei Lincei.

81.

Ruffini

(1898). On the minute anatomy of the neuromuscular spindles of the cat, and on their physiological significance. Journal of Physiology, 23, 190–208.

82.

Scarpa

(1789) Anatomicae disquisitiones de auditu et olfactu [The anatomical investigations of hearing and the sense of smell], Ticino, Switzerland: Galeati.

83.

Schickore

(2007) The microscope and the eye: A history of reflections 1740–1870, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

84.

Schleiden, M. (1838). Beiträge zur Phytogenesis. [Contributions to phytogenesis]. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 137–176.

85.

Schultze, M. (1856). Über die Endigungsweise des Geruchsnerven und die Epithelialgebilde der Nasenschleimhaut [On the mode of perfusion of the olfactory nerves and the epithelial structures of the nasal mucosa]. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 504–514.

86.

Schultze

(1858). Über die Endigungsweise des Hörnerven im Labyrinth [About the manner of ending the auditory nerve in the labyrinth]. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie and wissenschaftliche Medizin, 343–381.

87.

Schultze, M. (1862). Untersuchungen über den Bau der Nasenschleimhaut: Namentlich die Structur und Endigungsweise der Geruchsnerven [Investigations on the structure of the nasal mucous membrane, especially the structure and mode of attachment of the olfactory nerves]. Halle, Germany: Schmidt.

88.

Schultze

(1866). Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina [On the anatomy and physiology of the retina]. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 2, 175–286.

89.

Schwalbe

(1867). Das Epithel der Papillae vallatae [The epithelium of the vallate papillae]. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 3, 504–508.

90.

Schwalbe

(1868). Ueber die Geschmacksorgane der Säugethiere und des Menschen [On the taste organs of mammals and of man]. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 4, 154–187.

91.

Schwalbe

(1887) Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Sinnesorgane [Textbook of the anatomy of the sense organs], Erlangen, Germany: Besold.

92.

Schwann, T. (1839). Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Übereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachstum der Thiere und Pflanzen. [Microscopical researches into the accordance in the structure and growth of animals and plants]. Berlin, Germany: Reimer.

93.

Sinclair

(1967) Cutaneous sensations, London, England: Oxford University Press.

94.

Titchener

E. B.

(1915) A beginner’s psychology, New York, NY: Macmillan.

95.

Treviranus, G. R. (1837). Beiträge zur Aufklärung der Erscheinungen und Gesetze des organischen Lebens. Volume 1, Issue 3. Resultate neuer Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Sehens und über den innern Bau der Netzhaut des Auges [Contributions to the clarification of the phenomena and laws of organic life. Volume 1, Issue 3. Results of new investigations on the theory of vision and on the internal structure of the retina of the eye]. Bremen, Germany: Heyse.

96.

Turner

G. L.’E.

(1998) Scientiﬁc instruments 1500–1900. An introduction, Berkeley: University of California Press.

97.

Vater, A. (1747). Dissertatio de consensu partium corporis humani [Dissertation on agreements concerning parts of the human body]. In A. Haller, (Ed.). Disputationum anatomicarum selectarum, Vol. II. (pp. 953–971). Göttingen: Abram Vandenhoeck.

98.

van Leeuwenhoek

(1675). Microscopical observations from Mr. Leewenhoeck, concerning the optic nerve. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 9, 378–380.

99.

von Frey

(1894). Beiträge zur Physiologie des Schmerzsinns (Zweite Mitteilung) [Contributions to the physiology of pain (second communication)]. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 46, 283–297.

100.

von Frey

(1896) Untersuchungen über die Sinnesfunctionen der menschlichen Haut [Investigations on the sensory functions of the human skin], Leipzig, Germany: Hirzel.

101.

Wade

N. J.

(1995) Psychologists in word and image, Cambridge: MIT Press.

102.

Wade

N. J.

(2000). William Charles Wells (1757–1817) and vestibular research before Purkinje and Flourens. Journal of Vestibular Research, 10, 127–137.

103.

Wade

N. J.

(2004). Visual neuroscience before the neuron. Perception, 33, 869–889.

104.

Wade

N. J.

(2006). Perceptual portraits. International Review of Neurobiology, 74, 17–38.

105.

Wade

N. J.

(2007). Image, eye and retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 24, 1229–1249.

106.

Wade

N. J.

(2008a). Sehrot [Visual red]. Perception, 37, 1467–1470.

107.

Wade

N. J.

(2008b). Sehpurpur [Visual purple]. Perception, 37, 1617–1620.

108.

Wade

N. J.

(2016) Art and illusionists, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

109.

Wade

N. J.

(2017). Hidden images. In: Shapiro

Todorovic

(eds) Oxford compendium of visual illusions, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 778–784.

110.

Wade

N. J.

Piccolino

(2006) Nobel stains. Perception, 35, 1–8.

111.

Wagner, R., & Meissner, G. (1852). Über das Vorhandensein bisher unbekannter eigentümlicher Tastkörperchen (corpuscula tactus) in den Gefühlswärzchen der menschlichen Haut und über die Endausbreitung sensitiver Nerven [On the presence of previously unknown peculiar corpuscles (corpuscula tactus) in the sensory cusps of the human skin and on the end propagation of sensitive nerves]. Nachrichten von der Georg-Augusts-Universität und der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 2, 17–30.

112.

Waldeyer

(1891). Ueber einige neuere Forschungen im Gebiete der Anatomie des Centralnervensystems [On some recent research in the field of anatomy of the central nervous system]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift, 17, 1213–1218.

113.

Waller

(1847). Microscopic examination of the papillæ and nerves of the tongue of the frog, with observations on the mechanism of taste. London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 30, 277–290.

114.

Waller

(1849). Minute examination of the organ of taste in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 5, 803–804.

115.

van de Water

T. R.

(2012). Historical aspects of inner ear anatomy and biology that underlie the design of hearing and balance prosthetic devices. The Anatomical Record, 295, 1741–1759.

116.

Weismann

(1861). Ueber das Wachsen der quergestreiften Muskeln, nach Beobachtungen am Frosch [On the growth of striated muscles, after observations on the frog]. Zeitschrift für rationelle Medicin, 10, 263–284.

117.

Wersäll

(1956). Studies on the structure and innervation of the sensory epithelium of the cristae ampulares in the guinea pig: A light and electron microscopic investigation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 46(Suppl. 126): 1–85.

118.

Zippel

H. P.

(1993). Historical aspects of research on the vertebrate olfactory system. Naturwissenschaften, 80, 65–76.