Abstract
Purpose:
To examine the relationship between sleep habits and employee productivity.
Design:
Cross-sectional health risk assessment analysis.
Setting:
Employer-sponsored health and well-being programs.
Participants:
A total of 598 676 employed adults from multiple industries.
Measures:
Self-reported average hours of sleep, fatigue, absence days, and presenteeism.
Analysis:
Bivariate analyses to assess the relationships between self-reported hours of sleep and self-reported fatigue and mean and median absence and presenteeism.
Results:
The relationship between sleep hours and both measures of productivity was U-shaped, with the least productivity loss among employees who reported 8 hours of sleep. More daytime fatigue correlated with more absence and presenteeism. Median absence and presenteeism was consistently lower than mean absence and presenteeism, respectively, for the various hours of sleep and levels of fatigue.
Conclusion:
Organizations looking to expand the value of their investment in employee health and well-being should consider addressing the employee sleep habits that may be negatively impacting productivity.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between sleep duration, fatigue, and worksite productivity. The National Sleep Foundation recommends that adults under age 65 years get 7 to 9 hours of sleep every night. 1 Too little sleep has long been recognized as a health hazard, 2 yet 30% of employed adults report less than 7 hours of sleep per night. 3
Lack of sleep has been associated with lost productivity and higher medical costs. 4 –6 One study estimated that poor sleep costs employers between $2000 and $3000 in lost productivity per employee per year. 4 Other studies had similar findings in slightly larger groups, 5,6 but the generalizability of these results is still a concern.
Some employees who get too little sleep report not feeling tired. 6 Therefore, fatigue should be considered when assessing employee sleep habits. Simplifying the assessment of fatigue is an area of ongoing research 7 and multiple instruments of varying lengths exist. 8 None of these are ideally suited for workplace health and well-being programs.
Reproducing research findings is a vital part of the scientific process and deepens our collective understanding of most phenomena. 9 This study addressed similar research questions as previous studies, seeking to enhance our understanding of the association between sleep duration, fatigue, and workplace productivity by examining a very large data set comprised of data from multiple employers representing a variety of industries.
Methods
Design
All data for this cross-sectional study were collected using the StayWell® health risk assessment (HRA). 10,11 The HRA had 47 questions, though the online version used in this study had adaptive logic, reducing the question set to items relevant to the user. All data were collected as part of employer-sponsored health and well-being programs.
Sample
This study included the last HRA completed online by any employee in calendar years 2014 and 2015. Employees were typically given the opportunity to complete the HRA each year, with voluntary follow-up interventions available. Engagement strategies varied by employer and HRA completion rates averaged 42%, ranging between 12% and 98%. There was little variation by industry type. Duplicates were removed, so a given employee was only represented once. The study included employees ages 18 to 80 who had complete data for the 4 items described below.
Measures
Each employee was asked to report the average number of hours they slept per night (sleep quantity), as well as how often they felt tired during their waking hours (fatigue). Response options are shown in Table 1.
Descriptive Statistics of the Study Sample.
aThese industry categories were assigned using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) as a guide.
Absence was measured by asking the number of days an employee was absent for health reasons in the previous 12 months (range: 0-10+ days). This item has been studied for validity. 12
Presenteeism, the extent to which health problems limited work, was assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = “did not limit my work at all”; 10 = “completely prevented me from working”). Responses were treated as indicative of the percentage that one’s work was limited due to health problems. In past studies, this measure correlated well with health risks and changes in health risks. 13
Analysis
All bivariate analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. Due to the very large size of the data set, virtually all results met typical statistical significance thresholds, so no statistical significance results were reported.
Results
Demographics
The study sample is described in Table 1. A total of 598 676 employees were included in this analysis. The average age was 44.4 years and 54.5% were male. Employees were from 66 different organizations representing 5 broad industry categories.
The most common sleep duration was 7 hours (40.4% of employees). A majority of employees (58.6%) reported being “sometimes” tired during their waking hours. For absence, 50.2% of employees reported zero absences in the past 12 months. The mean days absent was 1.64. A large majority (79.8%) reported no lost productivity at work, and the mean presenteeism reported was 6.3%.
Sleep and Productivity
The cross-sectional relationships between the 2 sleep measures and absence and presenteeism measures are shown in Table 2. The relationship between hours of sleep and mean absence formed a U-shaped pattern. A similar pattern was found with mean presenteeism. This pattern, however, was not observed with median absence or median presenteeism.
Mean and median absence days and presenteeism by sleep behavior categories.
Employees who reported more frequent fatigue had higher mean reported absence days and presenteeism. A similar relationship was observed with median absence, though the median value was consistently lower than the mean. Median presenteeism was 0% across all categories of fatigue.
Discussion
Summary
This study builds on previous research 4 –6 but adds to the generalizability of the relationship between sleep and productivity with data from nearly 600 000 employees, 66 employers, and several industries. Having 8 hours of sleep was associated with the lowest productivity loss, though having 7 hours of sleep was very similar. “Almost always” and “Almost never” feeling tired were associated with the highest and lowest mean presenteeism and absence, respectively.
Median productivity loss was consistently lower than mean productivity loss, suggesting that some people can sleep too few or too many hours while being productive at work. It may be beneficial to focus interventions on employees who report both sleep and productivity impairments. Optimizing sleep behaviors for those employees may be one factor in moving toward peak performance.
Limitations
This study’s limitations include the simplicity of the analysis and the self-reported nature of the measures. Cross-sectional studies prevent the determination of causality. Both productivity measures have been studied previously, with promising validity. 12,13 Self-reported hours of sleep is not an uncommon measure 3 and is a practical necessity in employer-sponsored health and well-being programs. Other validated instruments for fatigue are typically longer and may be less useful in workplace settings. 7,8 Future research should examine the relationships described here using study designs that can control confounding variables and detect the temporal relationship between variables.
Significance
Poor sleep has long been recognized as a serious health risk, and this study enhances the generalizability of the literature demonstrating its association with productivity loss.
SO WHAT?
This study uses a large, multi-employer, multi-industry database to further demonstrate the relationship between sleep habits and employee productivity. To manage productivity, it may be important to offer support to employees who report poor sleep habits, frequent fatigue, and high rates of absence and presenteeism. Organizations looking to expand the value of their investment in employee health and well-being should consider helping employees obtain optimal sleep, so they might reach their peak performance.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
