Despite the number of publications about auditing organizational communication, scholars have paid little attention to the reliability and validity of individual audit techniques. This study examines the merits and restrictions of the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) by comparing CSQ results with results gathered with the critical incident technique. The authors used both instruments to assess the quality of internal communication within three organizations. They found that the two techniques converge and that the CSQ appears to have criterion-related validity. However, the CSQ fails to explicitly address issues of decision making, top-down and bottom-up communication, responsibilities, and the extent to which organizations keep rules and agreements. The authors conclude that the CSQ is an appropriate instrument for gaining overall insights into the way employees evaluate aspects of organizational communication but that the method is less suitable for diagnosing specific communication problems and formulating recommendations.
Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational communication and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-14.
2.
Booth, A. (1986). Communications audits: A UK survey. Leicester, UK: Taylor Graham.
3.
Booth, A. (1988). The communications audit. Cambridge, UK: Gower.
4.
Clampitt, P. G., & Downs, C. W. (1993). Employee perceptions of the relationship between communication and productivity: A field study. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 5-28.
5.
Clampitt, P. G., & Downs, C. W. (2004). Downs-Hazen Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire. In C. W. Downs & A. D. Adrian (Eds.), Assessing organizational communication (pp. 139-157). London: Guilford.
6.
Crino, M., & White, M. (1981). Satisfaction in communication: An examination of the Downs-Hazen measure. Psychological Reports, 49, 831-838.
7.
Downs, C. W. (1988). Communications audits. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
8.
Downs, C. W., & Adrian, A. D. (2004). Assessing organizational communication. London: Guilford.
9.
Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14, 63-73.
10.
Dunn, W. R., & Hamilton, D. D. (1986). The critical incident technique: A brief guide. Medical Teacher, 8, 207-215.
11.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
12.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldeline.
13.
Goldhaber, G. M. (1993). Organizational communication. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
14.
Goldhaber, G. M., & Rogers, D. P. (1979). Auditing organizational communication systems: The ICA communication audit. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
15.
Gray, J., & Laidlaw, H. (2004). Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 425-448.
16.
Greenbaum, H., Clampitt, P., & Willhnganz, S. (1988). Organizational communication: An examination of four instruments. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 245-282.
17.
Gregson, T. (1990). The separate constructs of communication satisfaction and job satisfaction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 39-48.
18.
Hamilton, S. (1987). A communication audit handbook: Helping organizations communicate. New York: Longman.
19.
Hargie, O., Dickson, D., & Tourish, D. (1999). Communication in management. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
20.
Hargie, O., & Tourish, D. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of communication audits for organisations. London: Routledge.
21.
Hargie, O., Tourish, D., & Wilson, N. (2002). Communication audits and the effects of increased information: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 414-436.
22.
Hecht, M. L. (1978). Measures of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 350-368.
23.
Larson, E., & Fukami, C. (1984). Relationships between worker behavior and commitment to the organization and union. In Proceedings of the Academy of Management (pp. 222-226).
24.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zadjac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
25.
Meyer, J. C. (2002). Organizational communication assessment: Fuzzy methods and the accessibility of symbols. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 472-479.
26.
Mohr, J. J., & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication flows in distribution channels: Impact on assessments of communication quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 71, 393-416.
27.
Orpen, C. (1997). The interactive effects of communication quality and job involvement on managerial job satisfaction and work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 131, 519-522.
28.
Pettit, J., Goris, J., & Vaught, B. (1997). An examination of organizational communication as moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 81-98.
29.
Pincus, J. D. (1986). Communication satisfaction, job satisfaction and job performance. Human Communication Research, 12, 395-419
30.
Ray, E. B. (1993). When the links become chains: Considering the dysfunctions of supportive communication in the workplace. Communication Monographs, 60, 106-111.
31.
Rubin, R. R., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (1994). Communication research measures. New York: Guilford.
32.
Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19, 385-417.
33.
Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction. Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. London: Sage.
34.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
35.
Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (1998). Communication between managers and staff in the NHS: Trends and prospects. British Journal of Management, 9, 53-71.
36.
Tourish, D., & Robson, P., (2003). Critical upward feedback in organizations: processes, problems and implications for communication management. Journal of Communication Management, 8(2), 150-167.
37.
Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 33(2), 111-131.
38.
Zwijze-Koning, K. H., & De Jong, M. D. T. (2007). The critical incident technique as a communication audit tool: A study into the quality of organizational communication (Working paper). Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente.
