At elections, voters choose among substantive programs and correspondingly, endow winning parties with determinate policy mandates. The article inquires into a neglected side of this `mandate theory' of elections: it explores the normative foundations of democratic mandates. The general norm, which demands that parties honor their campaign promises, is quite uncontroversial. The essay therefore reconstructs the controversial logic of norm application: it argues that different kinds of promises create different kinds of commitments; it explains `rules of transgression' which specify improper promises and `rules of exception' which allow parties to abandon their campaign pledges; and it looks at structural uncertainties electoral mandates are associated with. As the article concludes, electoral accountability is a complex and `essentially contested' task. It provokes (and presupposes) public controversies which in the last instance can be settled only by the supreme judge, the voter.
Arendt, Hannah
(1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Austin, John L.
(1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bean, Clive
(1993) `The Electoral Influence of Party Leader Images in Australia and New Zealand', Comparative Political Studies26(1): 111-132.
4.
Bennett, W. Lance
(1980) `The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts', Journal of Politics42: 793-817.
5.
Brox, Ottar
(1992) `Saying Things with Deeds: Exploring the Grammar and Dynamics of the “Record” Language of Politics - A Participant Observer's Account', Zeitschrift für Soziologie21(2): 126-138.
6.
Budge, Ian
and Richard I. Hofferbert (1990) `Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S. Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures', American Political Science Review84(1): 111-131.
7.
Dahl, Robert
(1992) `Myth of the Presidential Mandate', Political Science Quarterly105(3): 355-372.
8.
Downs, Anthony
(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Dryzek, John
(1990) Discursive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Edelman, Murray
(1985) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Ferejohn, John
(1986) `Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control', Public Choice50: 5-25.
12.
Ferejohn, John
(1990) `Information and the Electoral Process', in John Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds) Information and Democratic Process, pp. 1-19. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Fishkin, James
(1991) Democracy and Deliberation. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
14.
Gusy, Christoph
(1989) `Demokratische Repräsentation', Zeitschrift für Politik36(3): 264-285.
15.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
16.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
17.
Hofferbert, Richard I.
and Ian Budge (1992) `The Party Mandate and the Westminster Model: Election Programmes and Government Spending in Britain, 1948-85', British Journal of Political Science22: 151-182.
18.
Iyengar, Shanto
(1987) `Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs', American Political Science Review81(3): 815-831.
19.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
(1992) Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Keeler, John T. S.
(1993) `Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making', Comparative Political Studies25(4): 433-486.
21.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr
(1983) Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter
, Richard I. Hofferbert and Ian Budge (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
Krukones, Michael G.
(1984) Promise and Performance: Presidential Campaigns as Policy Predictors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
24.
Kymlicka, Will
(1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
Ladd, Everett C.
(1993) `The 1992 Vote for President Clinton: Another Brittle Mandate?', Political Science Quarterly108(1): 1-28.
26.
Lechner, Norbert
(1996) `Politics in Retreat: Redrawing Our Political Maps', in Andreas Schedler (ed.) The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics, pp. 168-184. London/New York: Macmillan/St Martin's Press.
27.
Lodge, Milton
, Kathleen McGraw and Patrick Stroh (1989) `An Impression Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation', American Political Science Review83(2): 399-419.
28.
Lowi, Theodore J.
(1985) The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
29.
McGraw, Kathleen M.
(1990) `Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications', British Journal of Political Science20: 119-142.
30.
McGraw, Kathleen M.
(1991) `Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts', American Political Science Review85(4): 1133-1157.
31.
Meyer, Thomas
(1992) Die Inszenierung des Scheins. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
32.
Miller, Arthur H.
and Martin P. Wattenberg (1985) `Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952-1980', American Political Science Review79: 359-372.
33.
Miller, Arthur H.
, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk (1986) `Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates', American Political Science Review80(2): 521-540.
34.
Monroe, Alan D.
(1995) `Public Opinion, Party Platforms, and Public Policy: 1984 and 1988', paper prepared for presentation at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Chicago, 31 August-3 September.
35.
Nun, José
(1994) `Postmodern Populism? The Paradoxes of Menemism', paper prepared for presentation at the First Vienna Dialogue on Democracy, The Politics of Antipolitics, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies, 7-10 July 1994.
36.
Page, Benjamin I.
(1976) `The Theory of Political Ambiguity', American Political Science Review70(3): 742-752.
37.
Patterson, Thomas E.
(1993) Out of Order. New York: Random House.
38.
Perry, Barbara A.
and Julia A. McDonough (1994) `The Clinton Campaign and Presidency: From Promises to Policies... and Back to Character', paper prepared for presentation at the XVIth World Congress of the International Political Sciences Association (IPSA), Berlin, 21-25 August.
39.
Pitkin, Hanna F.
(1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
Pomper, Gerald
and Susan Lederman (1982) Elections in America. New York: Longman.
41.
Powell, G. Bingham, Jr.
(1989). `Constitutional Design and Citizen Electoral Control', Journal of Theoretical Politics1(2): 107-130.
42.
Przeworski, Adam
and Susan C. Stokes (1995) `Citizen Information and Government Accountability: What Must Citizens know and What Can They Do to Control Politicians?', paper prepared for presentation at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Chicago, 31 August-3 September.
43.
Ramsden, Graham P.
(1996) `Media Coverage of Issues and Candidates: What Balance is Appropriate in a Democracy?', Political Science Quarterly111(1): 65-81.
44.
Royed, Terry J.
(1996) `Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras', British Journal of Political Science26: 45-80.
45.
Royed, Terry J.
and Stephen A. Borrelli (1995) `Testing Mandate Theory in the U.S.: Social Welfare Policy from Carter to Bush', paper prepared for presentation at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Chicago, 31 August-3 September.
46.
Sarcinelli, Ulrich
(1987) Symbolische Politik: Zur Bedeutung symbolischen Handelns in der Wahlkampfkommunikation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
47.
Schedler, Andreas
(1994) `Die (eigensinnige) kommunikative Struktur demokratischer Wahlen', Zeitschrift für Politik41(1): 22-44.
48.
Schedler, Andreas
(1996) `Introduction: Antipolitics - Closing or Colonizing the Public Sphere', in Andreas Schedler (ed.) The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics, pp. 1-20. London/New York: Macmillan/St Martin's Press.
49.
Schumpeter, Joseph A.
(1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row (reprinted 1975).
50.
Stokes, Donald E.
(1966) `Spatial Models of Party Competition', in Angus Campell (ed.) Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.
51.
Stokes, Susan (1990) `Democratic Accountability and Policy Change: Economic Policy in Fujimori's Peru', Working Paper 10. Chicago Center on Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
52.
Swint, Kerwin
(1995) `Negative Campaigning in American Elections: The Tactical Considerations of “Going Negative”, paper prepared for presentation at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Chicago, 31 August-3 September.
53.
Thompson, Dennis F.
(1980) `Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands', American Political Science Review74: 905-916.
54.
Toulmin, Stephen E.
(1956) Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Tulis, Jeffrey K.
(1987) The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
Zimmerman, Joseph F.
(1997) The Recall: Tribunal of the People. Westport, CT: Praeger.
