This article explores the ways in which the inherited fragmentation of public services and associated delivery arrangements are being addressed in Scotland. Specifically, the article considers the modernization of an established part of local governance — land use planning, and a novel articulation of modernization through community planning. There are important differences between them, yet they share common interests in securing the integration of service. Through a synthesis of research evidence, emerging policy documentation and consultation responses, we address three questions. First, is the emphasis on integration in both land use planning and community planning helping to address the fragmented state? Second, how are land use planning and community planning adapting to local circumstances? Third, what is the nature of the relationship between these different attempts to plan for local communities? The article considers to what extent this turn to integration within and between land use planning and community planning is constructive.
Carley, M. (2004) Implementing Community Planning: Building for the Future of Local Governance, Report No. 44. Glasgow: Communities Scotland.
7.
Community Planning Task Force (2003) Final Report of the Community Planning Task Force. Edinburgh : The Stationery Office Bookshop.
8.
Copus, C. (2006) `British Local Government: A Case for a New Constitutional Settlement', Public Policy and Administration21(2): 4—21.
9.
Cowell, R. (2004) `Community Planning: Fostering Participation in the Congested State?', Local Government Studies30(4): 497—518.
10.
Davies, J. (2005) `The Social Exclusion Debate', Policy Studies26(1): 3—27.
11.
Exworthy, M. and Powell, M. (2004) `Big Windows and Little Windows: Implementation in the Congested State', Public Administration82(2): 263—81.
12.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy . Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Goodstadt, V. and Buchan, G. (2002) `A Strategic Approach to Community Planning: Repositioning the Statutory Development Plan', in G. Cars , P. Healey, A. Mandipour and C. de Magalhães (eds) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux, pp. 168—90. Aldershot: Ashgate.
15.
Goodwin, M., Jones, M. and Jones, R. (2005) `Devolution, Constitutional Change and Economic Development: Explaining and Understanding the New Institutional Geographies of the British State', Regional Studies39(4): 421—36.
16.
Hassan, G. and Warhurst, C. (2002) `Future Scotland: The Making of the New Social Democracy', in G. Hassan and C. Warhurst (eds) Tomorrow's Scotland, pp. 5—25. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
17.
Hogg, K. (2000) Making a Difference: Effective Implementation of Cross-cutting Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Policy Review Unit.
18.
Illsley, B. and Lloyd, M.G. (2001) `A Community Leadership Initiative for Scotland? ', Politics21(2): 124—9.
19.
Jefferey, C. (2002) Devolution: Challenging Local Government?, Research Findings No. 012. York: YPS.
20.
Keating, M. (2005) `Policy Convergence and Divergence in Scotland under Devolution', Regional Studies39(4): 453—63.
21.
Lloyd, M.G. and Illsley, B.M. (1999) `An Idea for its Time?: Community Planning and Reticulism in Scotland', Regional Studies33(2): 181—4.
22.
Lloyd, M.G. and Peel, D. (2005) `Tracing a Spatial Turn in Planning Practice in Scotland', Planning, Practice and Research20(3): 313—25.
23.
Lloyd, M.G. and Peel, D. (2006) `Devolution, Decentralisation and Dispersal: Asserting the Spatiality of the Public Sector in Scotland', European Planning Studies1(6): 831—54.
24.
Midwinter, A. (1995) Local Government in Scotland. Reform or Decline . London: Macmillan.
25.
Milne, V. (2005) Joined up Working in the Scottish Executive, Research Finding 17/2005. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
26.
Morphet, J. (2004) RTPI: Scoping Paper on Integrated Planning. London: Royal Town Planning Institute Research and Knowledge Committee.
27.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) The Future of Local Government: Developing a 10 Year Vision. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
28.
Parry, R. (2002) `Delivery Structures and Policy Development in Post-devolution Scotland', Social Policy & Society1(4): 315—24.
29.
Parry, R. (2003) `The Scottish Executive and the Challenges of Complex Policy-making', The Political Quarterly74(4): 450—8.
30.
Peel, D. and Lloyd, M.G. (2005) `Development Plans, Lesson-drawing and Model Policies in a Modern Scotland', International PlanningStudies10(3—4): 265—87.
31.
Peel, D. and Lloyd, M.G. (2006a) `“Dialogue not Diktat”: Planning Modernisation and Community Engagement in Scotland', Town and Country Planning75(9): 240—2.
32.
Peel, D. and Lloyd, M.G. (2006b) `The Land Use Planning System in Scotland — but Not as we Know It!', Scottish Affairs57(Autumn): 90—111.
33.
Peel, D. and Lloyd, M.G. (2007) `Neo-traditional Planning: Towards a New Ethos for Land Use Planning?', Land Use Policy24(2): 396—403.
34.
Prior, A. (2000) `Problems in the Theory and Practice of Planning Enforcement', Planning Theory & Practice1(1): 53—69.
35.
Rehfisch, A. (2003) Town and Country Planning: Subject Profile. SPICe Briefing 3/27. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament.
36.
Richards, S., Barnes, M., Coulson, A., Gaster, L., Leach, B. and Sullivan, H. (1999) Cross-cutting Issues in Public Policy and Public Services. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
37.
Roberts, P. (2003) `Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Spatial Priorities and Mechanisms for Delivery', Sociological Inquiry73(2): 228—44.
38.
Rocket Science UK Ltd (2003) Partnership Rationalisation: Report of Research Study. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
39.
Royal Town Planning Institute (2001) A New Vision For Planning: Delivering Sustainable Communities, Settlements and Places. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.
