Recent works, both numerical and experimental, on residual stress and geometrical errors in selective laser melting-produced parts highlighted the preponderance of these phenomena. However, their mechanisms of appearance are not yet fully explained. An in-house finite element model was developed and implemented to reproduce their formations. The consistence of the model with existing simulation results and with respect to experimental observations was checked. Simulations were then performed using a computational design of experiments to better comprehend the underlying phenomena and the influence of the laser speed and power. Relationships between process parameters and residual stress, plastic strain, and geometrical errors formations have been put into evidence which can support optimization procedures at design stage.
MalekipourEEl-MounayriH. Common defects and contributing parameters in powder bed fusion am process and their classification for online monitoring and control: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 95: 527–550.
2.
BuchbinderDMeinersWPirchN, et al.Investigation on reducing distortion by preheating during manufacture of aluminum components using selective laser melting. J Laser Appl2014; 26: 012004.
3.
Neugebauer F, Keller N, Ploshikhin V, et al. Multi scale FEM simulation for distortion calculation in additive manufacturing of hardening stainless steel. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on thermal forming and welding distortion, Bremen, 2011.
4.
PapadakisLLoizouARisseJ, et al.Numerical computation of component shape distortion manufactured by selective laser melting. Proc CIRP2014; 18: 90–95.
5.
Roberts IA, Wang CJ, Stanford M, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of residual stresses in additive layer manufacturing by laser melting of metal powders. In: Advanced design and manufacture III: key engineering materials. vol. 450. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, pp.461–465.
6.
Van Belle L, Vansteenkiste G and Boyer JC. Investigation of residual stresses induced during the selective laser melting process. In: 16th ESAFORM conference on material forming (ESAFORM 2013). vol. 554–557. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, pp.1828–1834.
7.
ZhangYChenQGuillemotG, et al.Numerical modelling of fluid and solid thermomechanics in additive manufacturing by powder-bed fusion: continuum and level set formulation applied to track- and part-scale simulations. Comp Rend Méca2018; 346: 1055–1071.
8.
SalvatiELuntAJHeasonCP, et al.An analysis of fatigue failure mechanisms in an additively manufactured and shot peened in 718 nickel superalloy. Mater Des2020; 191: 108605.
9.
SalvatiELuntAYingS, et al.Eigenstrain reconstruction of residual strains in an additively manufactured and shot peened nickel superalloy compressor blade. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017; 320: 335–351.
10.
DemirAGPrevitaliB. Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting. Mater Des2017; 119: 338–350.
11.
WessargesYHagemannRGiesekeM, et al.Additive manufacturing of vascular implants by selective laser melting. Biomed Eng/Biomed Technik2014; 59: S401–S404.
12.
HodgeNEFerenczRMSolbergJM. Implementation of a thermomechanical model for the simulation of selective laser melting. Comput Mech2014; 54: 33–51.
13.
GaneriwalaRStrantzaMKingW, et al.Evaluation of a thermomechanical model for prediction of residual stress during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf2019; 27: 489–502.
14.
Bruna-RossoCDemirAGPrevitaliB. Selective laser melting finite element modeling: validation with high-speed imaging and lack of fusion defects prediction. Mater Des2018; 156: 143–153.
15.
Lemaitre J and Chaboche JL. Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Hill R. The mathematical theory of plasticity. vol. 11. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
18.
SimoJC. Algorithms for static and dynamic multiplicative plasticity that preserve the classical return mapping schemes of the infinitesimal theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1992; 99: 61–112.
19.
Bonet J and Wood RD. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
20.
Doghri I. Mechanics of deformable solids: linear, nonlinear, analytical and computational aspects. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
21.
Simo JC and Hughes TJR. Computational inelasticity. 1st ed. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics. vol. 7. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
22.
Ibrahimbegovic A. Nonlinear solid mechanics. 1st ed. Solid mechanics and its applications. vol. 160. The Netherlands: Springer, 2009.
23.
Holzapfel GA. Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2000.
24.
VujosevicLLubardaV. Finite-strain thermoelasticity based on multiplicative decomposition of deformation gradient. Theor Appl Mech2002; 28–29: 379–399.
25.
Panayiotis JK and Marc-Jean B. Thermal and structural properties of fusion related materials, www-ferp.ucsd.edu/LIB/PROPS/PANOS/ (1997, accessed 21 July 2020).
26.
AnandL. Constitutive equations for the rate-dependent deformation of metals at elevated temperatures. J Eng Mater Technol1982; 104: 12–17.
27.
VoceE. A practical strain hardening function. Metallurgia1955; 51: 219–226.
28.
SinghK. Strain hardening behaviour of 316L austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol2004; 20: 1134–1142.
29.
Bruna-RossoCDemirAGPrevitaliB, et al.Selective laser melting high performance modeling. In: IDrstvenekDDrummerMSchmidt (eds). Proceedings of 6th international conference on additive technologiesLjubljana, Slovenia: Interesansa–Zavod, pp. 252–259.
30.
SmithJXiongWCaoJ, et al.Thermodynamically consistent microstructure prediction of additively manufactured materials. Comput Mech2016; 57: 359–370.
31.
CasatiRLemkeJVedaniM. Microstructure and fracture behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Sci Technol2016; 32: 738–744.
32.
LiCThomasBG. Thermomechanical finite-element model of shell behavior in continuous casting of steel. Metall Mater Trans B2004; 35: 1151–1172.
33.
KoricSThomasBG. Efficient thermo-mechanical model for solidification processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng2006; 66: 1955–1989.
34.
DenlingerERHeigelJCMichalerisP. Residual stress and distortion modeling of electron beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2014; 229: 153–166.
35.
PengHGhasri-KhouzaniMGongS, et al.Fast prediction of thermal distortion in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, Part 2: a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model. Addit Manuf2018; 22: 869–882.
36.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures, Part 1-2, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
37.
LégerSFortinATibirnaC, et al.An updated Lagrangian method with error estimation and adaptive remeshing for very large deformation elasticity problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng2014; 100: 1006–1030.
38.
AuricchioFTaylorR. A return-map algorithm for general associative isotropic elasto-plastic materials in large deformation regimes. Int J Plast1999; 15: 1359–1378.
39.
MercelisPKruthJP. Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J2006; 12: 254–265.
40.
ShiomiMOsakadaKNakamuraK, et al.Residual stress within metallic model made by selective laser melting process. CIRP Ann2004; 53: 195–198.
41.
SimsonTEmmelADwarsA, et al.Residual stress measurements on AISI 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf2017; 17: 183–189.
42.
ArndtDBangerthWClevengerTC, et al.The deal.II library, version 9.1. J Numer Math2019; 27: 203–213.
43.
Van Belle L, Vansteenkiste G and Boyer JC. Comparisons of numerical modelling of the selective laser melting. In: 15th ESAFORM conference on material forming (ESAFORM 2012). vol. 504. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, pp.1067–1072.
44.
ChengBShresthaSChouK. Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf2016; 12: 240–251.
45.
ZhangBDembinskiLCoddetC. The study of the laser parameters and environment variables effect on mechanical properties of high compact parts elaborated by selective laser melting 316L powder. Mater Sci Eng A2013; 584: 21–31.
46.
DesuRKKrishnamurthyHNBaluA, et al.Mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel 304L and 316L at elevated temperatures. J Mater Res Technol2016; 5: 13–20.
47.
KruthJPDeckersJYasaE, et al.Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2012; 226: 980–991.
48.
Yeung H, Lane B, Fox J, et al. Continuous laser scan strategy for faster build speeds in laser powder bed fusion system. In: The solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, 2020.
49.
BertoliUSWolferAJMatthewsMJ, et al.On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des2017; 113: 331–340.
50.
KingWEBarthHDCastilloVM, et al.Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol2014; 214: 2915–2925.
