Energy absorption design study of subway vehicles based on a scaled equivalent model test

Abstract

To obtain the characteristics of collision energy absorption and improve the passive safety of subway vehicles, the energy absorption design of subway vehicles was studied based on a one-seventh-scale model crash test. A full-size three-dimensional model of a subway vehicle was established using the multibody dynamics software MADYMO. The simulation results of the dynamics model were scaled down according to the similarity coefficients. By comparing the simulation results with the scaled model test results, the maximum error of deformation was 2.10 and 4.35% for the head car and the maximum deforming middle car, respectively, and the energy absorption error was found to be 8.75 and 5.70% for the head car and the maximum deforming middle car, respectively. The results indicate that the collision dynamics model of subway vehicles is relatively accurate. Next, based on this dynamics model, a full factorial experiment was designed to study the effects of the marshalling, mass and crushing tube’s plastic deformation platform force on the energy absorption of subway vehicles. The calculation results were fitted by multiple linear regression functions. Finally, the authors obtained the crash energy absorption formulas for the subway head car with an accuracy of 98.42% and for the maximum deforming middle car with an accuracy of 95.31%. These formulas can be applied to the preliminary design of subway vehicles and offer guiding significance for the parameter design of subway vehicles’ energy-absorbing devices.

Keywords

Subway vehicles collision scaled equivalent model energy absorption multibody dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Han

Koo

. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions. Veh Syst Dyn 2003; 40: 435–450.

Xue

Schmid

Smith

. Analysis of the structural characteristics of an intermediate rail vehicle and their effect on vehicle crash performance. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2007; 221: 339–352.

Hosseini-Tehrani

Nankali

. Study on characteristics of a crashworthy high-speed train nose. Int J Crashworthiness 2010; 15: 161–173.

Baykasoğlu

Sünbüloğlu

Bozdağ

et al.

Railroad passenger car collision analysis and modifications for improved crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness 2011; 16: 319–329.

Peng

et al.

Scaled tests and numerical simulations of rail vehicle collisions for various train sets. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2016; 230: 1590–1600.

Peng

Hou

Yang

et al.

Investigation of the train driver injuries and the optimization design of driver workspace during a collision. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2017; 231: 902–915.

Belingardi

Cavatorta

Duella

. Material characterization of a composite–foam sandwich for the front structure of a high speed train. Compos Struct 2003; 61: 13–25.

Ambrósio

. Crash analysis and dynamical behaviour of light road and rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2005; 43: 385–411.

Tian

Gao

Yao

et al.

Structure realization method for collapse threshold of plastic deformation in train collision condition. J Cent South Univ Technol 2011; 18: 244–249.

10.

Yang

Peng

et al.

Cut-out grooves optimization to improve crashworthiness of a gradual energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Mater Des 2016; 103: 132–143.

11.

Milho

Ambrósio

JAC

Pereira

. Design of train crash experimental tests by optimization procedures. Int J Crashworthiness 2004; 9: 483–493.

12.

Scholes

Lewis

. Development of crashworthiness for railway vehicle structures. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 1993; 207: 1–16.

13.

Xie

Yang

et al.

Crashworthiness optimisation of a composite energy-absorbing structure for railway vehicles. Struct Multidiscip O 2017; 57: 1793–1807.

14.

Peng

Wang

Yao

et al.

Crashworthiness analysis and optimization of a cutting-style, energy absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Thin-Walled Struct 2017; 120: 225–235.

15.

Xie

Zhou

. Research on the crashworthy structures of subway vehicles. Int J Crashworthiness 2014; 19: 555–566.

16.

Peng

Deng

et al.

Study on the collision performance of a composite energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Thin-Walled Struct 2015; 94: 663–672.

17.

Peng

Wang

Xiong

et al.

Crashing analysis and multi-objective optimisation of duplex energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicle. Int J Crashworthiness 2016; 21: 338–352.

18.

Yang

Peng

et al.

Crash performance and multi-objective optimization of a gradual energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Int J Mech Sci 2016; 107: 1–12.

19.

Xing

Yao

et al.

Energy distribution analysis and multi-objective optimization of a gradual energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Thin-Walled Struct 2017; 115: 255–263.

20.

. Energy absorption requirement for crashworthy vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2002; 216: 31–39.

21.

Jacobsen K, Tyrell D and Perlman B. Impact test of a crash-energy management passenger rail car. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/IEEE joint rail conference, 2004, pp.19–26. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: IEEE.

22.

Rancatore R, Mayville R and Baldwin M. Fullscale two-car impact test: a comparison of measured and model results. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/IEEE joint rail conference, 2004, pp.1–10. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: IEEE.

23.

Severson

. The development of collision dynamics models to estimate the results of full-scale rail vehicle impact tests, Medford, MA: Tufts University, 2000.

24.

Pereira

Ambrosio

JAC

Dias

. Crashworthiness analysis and design using rigid-flexible multibody dynamics with application to train vehicles. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1997; 40: 655–687.

25.

Ambrósio

. Crash analysis and dynamical behaviour of light road and rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2005; 43: 385–411.

26.

Lowe

Al-Hassani

STS

Johnson

. Impact behaviour of small scale model motor coaches. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 1972; 186: 409–419.

27.

Barley

Mills

. A study of impact behavior through the use of geometrically similar models. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 1969; 184: 26–33.

28.

Kao GC and Chan GC. A scale model study of crash energy dissipating vehicle structures. Report, Wyle Laboratories, Alabama, 1968.

29.

Yao

Yan

et al.

Energy-absorption optimisation of locomotives and scaled equivalent model validation. Int J Crashworthiness 2017; 22: 1–12.

30.

Technical Committee CEN/TC 256 Railway Applications. BS EN 15227-2008 railway applications: crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies. London: British Standard Institution, 2008.

31.

Yu TX and Lu G. Energy absorption of structures and materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003, pp.50–58.

32.

Lens

Cardona

Geradin

. Energy preserving time integration for constrained multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 2004; 11: 41–61.