Abstract
The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide recently published research analysis of the risk of suicide based on data from the Australian Defence Force (ADF). We aim to provide a brief summary of the salient findings, as well as a commentary from a clinical perspective for the psychiatric profession providing care for ADF serving members and veterans who bear a burden of psychiatric morbidity related to the nature of their work. The suicide risk from current and past service, and in certain roles, highlight the challenges facing those in military service, with implications for the time spent on active deployment and transition post-deployment.
“No employee, whether an infantry soldier, police officer, landscape gardener, warehouse worker or librarian, should be expected to accept higher rates of suicide just because of the occupation they chose.” The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide
Recruitment to the Australian Defence Force (ADF) involves both physical and psychological screening, given the risk of exposure to stressful and potentially traumatising situations. However, despite pre-recruitment screening Australian researchers found 22% of the ADF population had experienced a mental disorder in the previous 12 months 1 Of these serving ADF, 9.5% had an ICD-10 affective disorder, 14.8% had an ICD-10 anxiety disorder, and 5.2% had an ICD-10 alcohol disorder. 1 This population therefore likely suffers psychiatric morbidity related to their work. 1
Our editorial comments on research recently published as part of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide in Volume 7 of the final report, 2 in Appendices H, and J with the aim of informing the clinical practice of psychiatrists and doctors providing care to serving and former ADF members. The following summaries for each study in the Appendices are reproduced from Volume 7 of the report for ease of reference. 2 We comment after each section.
We note the caveat that the Royal Commission placed before the first Appendix H below that the intent was not specifically to identify risk profiles; however, suitable comparators were chosen and analyses used standardised mortality ratios. 2 These results also have to interpreted in the context of the existing AIHW reporting of suicide rates in serving and ex-serving ADF from 1997 to 2022. 3 This data shows that the highest rates of suicide were in ex-serving males at 31 per 100,000 population and 14.9 per 100,000 in ex-serving females. For actively serving (permanent) personnel, males had a suicide rate of 13.2 per 100,000, and females 5.0 per 100,000, whilst reservist rates were 13.7 per 100,000 for males and 4.2 per 100,000 for females. However, the rates for active service and reservist females should be interpreted with caution as the number of identified suicides was less than 20. 3 Relative to the Australian population there were lower suicide risks for permanent (47%) and reservist (45%) males. 3 Ex-serving males have a 25% increased risk of suicide, while ex-serving females have a 100% increased risk of suicide. 3 Relative to the Australian population, suicide risks were therefore lower for permanent (47%) and reservist (45%) males. 3 By contrast, ex-serving males had a 25% increased risk of suicide, while ex-serving females had a 100% increased risk. 3
Specifically, the AIHW report for 2022 (released September 2024) states:
“The differences between the Final Report [of the Royal Commission] and this AIHW report include variations in:
• the monitoring period. The AIHW report includes the most recent year of available deaths data (2022) in analysis • the groups for suicide rate comparison with the ADF population. For example, the Final Report includes analysis that compares the suicide rate of the serving ADF population with employed Australian population • the service-related characteristics analysed, and the statistical methods used for analysis’.
3
In this context, we discuss the findings.
Appendix H – comparative rates of suicide – current serving ADF members
For serving ADF members, there was an overall 30% increased risk of suicide compared to employed Australian males, which is even greater in particular combat and security roles (100%), including the infantry (153%) and Naval small arms specialists (453%). Those who faced trials or were convicted were over 13 times more likely to die by suicide. In contrast, reservists who had never served in the permanent force were 62% less likely to die by suicide than the general population of Australian males. Psychiatrists should therefore seek details of the roles and nature of veterans’ service in history-taking, in order to discern potential risk factors.
ADF serving groups associated with higher rates of suicide
Source: Commonwealth_of_Australia. Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide – Volume 7 Final Report, https://defenceveteransuicide.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2024-09/final-report-volume-7.pdf (2024, accessed 11 September 2024).
Appendix I – comparative rates of suicide – ex-serving ADF members
The important comparator for suicide rates was the general Australian population, as per advice from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).
Male veterans who served in the permanent forces were significantly more likely to die by suicide than the general Australian male population. For instance, those in combat and security roles were 112% more likely to die by suicide than Australian males, while those in logistics roles were 69% more at risk. Males who separated involuntarily for medical reasons were 202% more likely to die by suicide than Australian males and those convicted of disciplinary offenses or who suffered traumatic injuries during service faced even greater risks. For example, males convicted of a section 24 offence (absence without leave) were 426% more likely to die by suicide rising to 1144% following conviction for prejudicial conduct. Finally, males who experienced musculoskeletal injuries were over three times more likely to die by suicide than Australian males.
Females who served in the permanent forces also had a significantly higher risk of suicide compared to the general Australian female population. This risk was particularly elevated for those in roles relating to combat and security (452%) or health (212%), as well as involuntary separation for medical reasons (388%) and “not in the service interest” (245%). Females who enlisted as minors in the reserve forces were also at a heightened risk of suicide (189%). Finally, those who suffered a traumatic joint, ligament, muscle, or tendon injury during service had 6 times the risk of suicide.
In summary, there were increased risks of suicide in both male and female veterans. Again, certain roles for males, such as Commando (which includes special forces operators) and Rifleman (combat), as well as Logistics had very high suicide risks. Males and females in combat and security roles had high rates of suicide. Again, for males and female, involuntary separation for medical reasons, or not being retained in service, increased suicide risk. Notably, females who served in health-related roles also had a heightened risk of suicide. Female reservists who enlisted as a minor also had increased risks of suicide. Males convicted of an offence, analogous to that for serving members, had increased suicide risk. Those with physical joint and soft tissue injuries also had markedly increased risks of suicide.
ADF ex-serving groups associated with higher rates of suicide
Source: Commonwealth_of_Australia. Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide – Volume 7 Final Report, https://defenceveteransuicide.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2024-09/final-report-volume-7.pdf (2024, accessed 11 September 2024).
Appendix J comparative hospital admissions for self-harm and mental health
Ex-service personnel, particularly those who served in the permanent forces, were significantly more likely to be admitted to public hospitals for self-harm related diagnoses compared to the general Australian population. This effect was more pronounced among females, who are 160% more likely to be admitted than Australian females. Older veterans and females who served in the permanent forces, were also at particular risk of being admitted to public hospitals for stress-related mental health conditions. For instance, ex-serving male patients aged 65 or more were 430% more likely to be admitted compared to Australian patients in the same age group. In terms of specific diagnoses, female veterans were more likely to be admitted for depression-related conditions, particularly in younger age groups, while males, especially older individuals, were more likely to be admitted for alcohol abuse.
The risks for admission to public hospitals for self-harm in ex-service personnel are therefore unacceptably high, as are those for stress-related mental health conditions, depression, and alcohol abuse. Importantly, this does not include data on private psychiatric admissions, which are covered by a number of programs that are available to current and former ADF members, and it is notable that PTSD and trauma-related disorders are among the most common diagnoses for private psychiatric hospital admissions. 4
Overall comments
It is not suggested that the above findings, as comprehensive and useful as they are, necessarily apply to all serving or ex-serving ADF personnel. However, the data may encourage psychiatrists caring for veterans to seek more detailed information on the type of ADF service, and the specific experiences that may lead to stress-related or depressive symptoms and the need for mental health care or admission.
There are also questions raised for further research, such as, for example, why there is a particular risk for logistics roles, and the mechanisms by which disciplinary action impacts upon ex-serving and serving ADF members. In addition, what are the particular adverse experiences faced by young female reservist roles, and also worryingly in another way, for those involved in healthcare? While the heightened risk of suicide experienced by personnel in combat and security roles is more understandable, more information is needed on how this might be mitigated.
The findings of greater risk are somewhat in contrast to previous findings of reduced risk, and those from the AIHW ‘Serving and ex-serving Australian Defence Force members who have served since 1985: suicide monitoring 1997 to 2022’ released in 2024. 3 For example, the study of 2017-2020 AIHW data, which examined suicide rates in the Australian Defence Force serving and ex-service personnel found that there were significantly lower suicide rates in both full-time and reservist members. 5 These findings were consistent with lower or comparable suicide rates in serving military personnel in the United Kingdom, Canada, United States, and New Zealand. 5 Interestingly, this did not apply to personnel who had left the ADF: ‘The rate of completed suicides in ex-serving ADF males, however, is more than double the rate for serving ADF males. The rate of completed suicides in ex-serving ADF men is higher than Australian men of the same age, and this rate is significantly higher in ex-serving ADF men aged below 30 years’ 5 (p.471). In 2021, it was concluded that there was insufficient information to analyse female ADF members or veterans’ suicide rates. A recent scoping review reinforces that the greatest risk of suicide is in those who have transitioned from the military, and that depression was most commonly associated with suicide. 6 Notably the Royal Commission report has possibly the most details on the role and nature of service, including disciplinary matters in comparison to prior research. 2 The reasons for the apparent discrepancies with the Royal Commission report were cited at the beginning of our commentary, and largely relate to different research and statistical methodologies, but these are not described in detail in the Royal Commission report. 3
The detailed analysis of suicide risk for active, reserve and ex-service ADF members in the Royal Commission report reveals that if the data are scrutinised at a granular level, there appear to be identified higher suicide risks for certain subpopulations, in comparison with working age or the general Australian population respectively. However, as indicated at the outset, the Royal Commission cautioned against risk profiling on the basis of the data. Nonetheless, it has been informative to see the data for female ADF serving or ex-service personnel. We would encourage regular AIHW monitoring of defence force related suicides.
Given these findings, perhaps it is also reasonable, with regard to the Royal Commission’s recommendation on the need to improve transition to civilian life and accessing care, 2 to consider also how to discuss how long ADF members should serve, and in what capacity. There is an analogous consideration for all first responder professions, including the military, police, paramedics/ambulance officers, firefighters, and frontline healthcare workers – how long can a career be sustained, and when and how to navigate leaving the profession, and of course, developing an identity? As the epigraph reminds, no profession, such as military service should expect a higher suicide rate than that of the general population. If the medical profession is to be of service to those who have served, it must consider the evidence, encourage research into effective interventions, and provide care as is practicable on an individualised basis.
Footnotes
Author contributions
All authors have satisfied: Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; AND Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND Final approval of the version to be published; AND Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Disclosure
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JCLL, SA, TB and SK are on the editorial team of the journal. This paper was commissioned and was not peer-reviewed.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
